0-60 times for stock 350Z's
#45
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: so.cal
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So is the 06 heavier bc many people have been to track days and gotten a weight on 06 vs 03-05 and they have all said no difference. And how is an 06 with 13hp improvement over 05 slower. And 07 only has 6hp more and has been est. as it being faster than both when no one has data to prove this.
#46
Registered User
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by Alberto
This thread is silly...
Its a drivers race, and I doubt a stock Z would do 4.9, but 0-60 is for bench racers not for people that really run their cars. Whoever said a stock Z with slicks would likely break--->wow are you behind I ran slicks NA, with the single turbo and 1 pass so far with my Twin Turbo and over 500whp-still stock axles, no issues with launching. I cut 2.05 60ft bone stock, 1.8's NA and 1.7 with the single turbo slipping the clutch out of the hole not launching hard. For you 0-60 mag racers, if you type in my cars weight, 60ft, and 1/4 time and trap into a 0-60 calculator, the 0-60 time on my 11.98 run was 3.5 seconds. Watch the video if you want to time it
Its a drivers race, and I doubt a stock Z would do 4.9, but 0-60 is for bench racers not for people that really run their cars. Whoever said a stock Z with slicks would likely break--->wow are you behind I ran slicks NA, with the single turbo and 1 pass so far with my Twin Turbo and over 500whp-still stock axles, no issues with launching. I cut 2.05 60ft bone stock, 1.8's NA and 1.7 with the single turbo slipping the clutch out of the hole not launching hard. For you 0-60 mag racers, if you type in my cars weight, 60ft, and 1/4 time and trap into a 0-60 calculator, the 0-60 time on my 11.98 run was 3.5 seconds. Watch the video if you want to time it
#48
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 4,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by skmaxima2535
IT LOOKS LIKE TO ME THAT U CANT DRIVE ACCORDING TO UR VIDEO
dude, i dont know how they roll on the maxima forums but you arent going to get very far here with your attitude. Plus those numbers that were posted are completely wrong. 4.9 for an 03? falling off a cliff maybe
EDIT: for not reading kipskins sarcasm, so on that note, yes those numbers are 100% C-O-R-R-E-K-T
if you knew anything about cars you'd know your question is pretty much retarded.
And your friend is retarded too if he's basing his decision on what year the Z has the fastest 0-60 . how old are you, 13?
Last edited by drivenCSZ; 02-08-2007 at 05:51 PM.
#51
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 5,998
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Alberto
Whoever said a stock Z with slicks would likely break--->wow are you behind I ran slicks NA, with the single turbo and 1 pass so far with my Twin Turbo and over 500whp-still stock axles, no issues with launching.
#52
Originally Posted by kpiskin
This is what the word is on the street:
2003 4.9
2004 5.3
2005 5.6
2006 6.0
2007 5.8
All that extra weight is a *****.
2003 4.9
2004 5.3
2005 5.6
2006 6.0
2007 5.8
All that extra weight is a *****.
and skmaxima2535 believed it lol OMG
someone teach this kid
#53
Cranky FI Owner
iTrader: (14)
Originally Posted by HDPD350Z
Stick to your opinion and me to mine. I would take the peace of mind and spend a few bucks on a drive shaft loop before running slicks. Just because your axles or DS didn't break doesn't mean all are safe. Friend of mine snapped an axle on his Z, and he is only at about 380 rwhp. Lucky him it was only the axle. Broken driveshaft (possible with slicks) can be alot more hazardous to one's and vehicle's health.
To the guys saying I cant drive due to a 2.05 60ft time stock, I only ran the car 3X stock---> 13.80, 13.77, 13.86 were the times, lets see you guys go do that in only 3 passes your first time out in the car
#54
Banned
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bel Air, MD
Posts: 2,856
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by skmaxima2535
IT LOOKS LIKE TO ME THAT U CANT DRIVE ACCORDING TO UR VIDEO
looks to me like you have 21 posts, type in all caps, and probably suck at life. Did you even watch the video, did you check the timeslip section? Do you have some better numbers to post that you can verify?
NO so
#57
Originally Posted by GFrnk69
Yea,
https://my350z.com/forum/drag/233840-top-25-1-4-mile-times-for-tt-st-supercharger-nitrous-bolt-ons-stock.html
How many Rev Ups do we see?
https://my350z.com/forum/drag/233840-top-25-1-4-mile-times-for-tt-st-supercharger-nitrous-bolt-ons-stock.html
How many Rev Ups do we see?
#58
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by skmaxima2535
IT LOOKS LIKE TO ME THAT U CANT DRIVE ACCORDING TO UR VIDEO
Have you ever driven a 500+ RWHP FI vehicle? If so, please feel free to respond.. If not, hush.
Originally Posted by Willie
+1, a 2 second 60ft stock is really ****ty.
#59
Banned
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bel Air, MD
Posts: 2,856
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by tylerdurden07
Have you ever driven a 500+ RWHP FI vehicle? If so, please feel free to respond.. If not, hush.
For a RWD vehicle that is stock, you're saying thats $h!tty? What are your stock 60ft's sir? Please enlighten me..
For a RWD vehicle that is stock, you're saying thats $h!tty? What are your stock 60ft's sir? Please enlighten me..
I would also be intrigued to know this as well... probably high 2-3 seconds lol non enthusiasts/haters... sad sad sad
Alberto 11.9 w/ single turbo sucks! LMAO just kidding of course...