Notices
2009+ 370Z General discussion and news for the Z34 (2009+) Nissan 370z with the new 3.7-liter V6

Why does the 370z suck at 0-60?

Old 12-02-2008, 09:45 AM
  #1  
A7X-Joker
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
A7X-Joker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: TN
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Why does the 370z suck at 0-60?

I just watched this video on youtube and they say it goes from 0-60 in 5.1 sec.
So what, all that weight reduction and additional Hp doesn't amount to anything?
I'm pretty sure that the 07 and 08 Zs ran the same time. Also how come they are able to pull 26 more hp out of that 3.7L but only 2 more lbs-ft. or torque?



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o4dzg7ZJ4B8
Old 12-02-2008, 09:46 AM
  #2  
Liquid
Registered User
 
Liquid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by A7X-Joker
I just watched this video on youtube and they say it goes from 0-60 in 5.1 sec.
So what, all that weight reduction and additional Hp doesn't amount to anything?
I'm pretty sure that the 07 and 08 Zs ran the same time. Also how come they are able to pull 26 more hp out of that 3.7L but only 2 more lbs-ft. or torque?



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o4dzg7ZJ4B8
Motor Trend got a 0-60 in 4.7 and a 1/4 mile in 13.3.
Old 12-02-2008, 09:47 AM
  #3  
A7X-Joker
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
A7X-Joker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: TN
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Do you have a link to a video or article so I can see?
Old 12-02-2008, 09:49 AM
  #4  
KornerCarver
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
KornerCarver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Republic, MO
Posts: 3,387
Received 171 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Do 0-60 times really matter that much? I used to own an Austin Healey Sprite and I think it's 0-60 time was around 25 seconds. That car was a blast to drive. Balance is the key to having a fun car. I just don't understand the disappointment with the performance parameters of the 370Z.
Old 12-02-2008, 09:49 AM
  #5  
Liquid
Registered User
 
Liquid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by A7X-Joker
Do you have a link to a video or article so I can see?
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...est/index.html

Enjoy.
Old 12-02-2008, 09:52 AM
  #6  
A7X-Joker
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
A7X-Joker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: TN
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KornerCarver
Do 0-60 times really matter that much? I used to own an Austin Healey Sprite and I think it's 0-60 time was around 25 seconds. That car was a blast to drive. Balance is the key to having a fun car. I just don't understand the disappointment with the performance parameters of the 370Z.

I just like a pretty quick Z stock and I was hopping for a little more. 4.5 would be sweet stock. I would love to get it to 4 sec flat or just get a gtr and get 3.5 and better.
Old 12-02-2008, 09:52 AM
  #7  
bboypuertoroc
New Member
iTrader: (4)
 
bboypuertoroc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Get out my way pimpin, VA
Posts: 22,909
Received 2,446 Likes on 1,768 Posts
Default

Why do people get so stuck on 0-60?
Old 12-02-2008, 09:55 AM
  #8  
S8ER95Z
New Member
 
S8ER95Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Quad Cities
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

These times are published by sources that have proven time and time again that they are no where near talented.

Case in point? These same magazines have times posted for my car ranging from 13.7 to 14.0 in the 1/4 mile.

My car was 100% bone stock at the time and my first pass ever was at 3200DA and I ran a 13.4 @ 105mph on a 2.1 60ft... when I got the chance to run in good weather (-303ft DA) I went 13.1 @ 108mph on a 2.1 60ft. Then the Fiancee ran the car at 127ft DA and went 13.1 @ 105mph on a 1.99 60ft.

We are not even close to the talented drivers who hold records and I consider myself to be an average joe. These magazine times are good for getting an idea of what the car will do but they are no where near what the car is actually capable of.

Furthermore...reading that article you will see this... "3.5-liter Nismo 350Z we tested in 2007, which ran 4.9 and 13.5 at 103.9"... compare that to several members on this site...

1. Pat Bateman ---------------------07 Base 6spd 13.150@107.62mph 2.027 60ft
2. Veetec --------------------------07 Base 6spd 13.157@105.32mph 1.938 60ft
3. Peak350 -------------------------07 Enth 6spd 13.239@105.67mph 1.923 60ft


Just looking at those results and seeing other people posting up 4 tenths quicker... hmmm.. if that same mag runs 13.3 and someone on here can knock off 4 tenths..you are looking at least 13 flat (and sub 4.5 0-60 times).... who is to say this one won't have even more in it than the last one?

Last edited by S8ER95Z; 12-02-2008 at 10:01 AM.
Old 12-02-2008, 09:56 AM
  #9  
redline06
Registered User
 
redline06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,580
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

^ beats me! 0-60 is just for magazines and serves little purpose, i think magazines should have a full 1/4 timeslip to show their times, including temp , elevation blah blah
Old 12-02-2008, 10:04 AM
  #10  
bboypuertoroc
New Member
iTrader: (4)
 
bboypuertoroc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Get out my way pimpin, VA
Posts: 22,909
Received 2,446 Likes on 1,768 Posts
Default

^ Half the time, mags don't even go to a drag strip. They use whatever testing equipment they have on an unprepped surface (as in non-drag strip, normal road).
Old 12-02-2008, 10:07 AM
  #11  
S8ER95Z
New Member
 
S8ER95Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Quad Cities
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bboypuertoroc
^ Half the time, mags don't even go to a drag strip. They use whatever testing equipment they have on an unprepped surface (as in non-drag strip, normal road).
Good point.. I guess i can't say all of them are not talented..their testing methods probably leave a lot on the table as well.
Old 12-02-2008, 10:29 AM
  #12  
davidv
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
davidv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 42,754
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Oh no what should we do?
Old 12-02-2008, 10:44 AM
  #13  
Z053
Registered User
 
Z053's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Caliii
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by davidv
Oh no what should we do?
There's only one thing to do....

RACE WARS!
Old 12-02-2008, 10:48 AM
  #14  
Marcus's Z
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Marcus's Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Syracuse
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Z053
There's only one thing to do....

RACE WARS!
LOL that made my day
Old 12-02-2008, 10:59 AM
  #15  
Endgame
Registered User
 
Endgame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by A7X-Joker
I just like a pretty quick Z stock and I was hopping for a little more. 4.5 would be sweet stock. I would love to get it to 4 sec flat or just get a gtr and get 3.5 and better.
Are you really going to feel the .2 seconds you desired time of 4.5 seconds when compared to MT's 4.7??????
Old 12-02-2008, 11:30 AM
  #16  
VQstl
Registered User
 
VQstl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: st louis, MO
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

"I live my life 60 mph at a time" LOL!

Anything under 6 seconds in a quick car, under 5 very fast, under 4 is just ballistic.

Seriously, if you want to race in a straight line go get a v-8.

The Z is a sports car, not a muscle car or straight line drag.
Old 12-02-2008, 11:50 AM
  #17  
hiz-n-herz
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
 
hiz-n-herz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: SF South Bay area
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by A7X-Joker
I just watched this video on youtube and they say it goes from 0-60 in 5.1 sec.
So what, all that weight reduction and additional Hp doesn't amount to anything?
I'm pretty sure that the 07 and 08 Zs ran the same time. Also how come they are able to pull 26 more hp out of that 3.7L but only 2 more lbs-ft. or torque?



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o4dzg7ZJ4B8
I you care about 0-60 so much, just swap in a final drive that will allow 2nd gear to top out at 62mph. Voila...

Some 4.08's might do it.

I like a fast 0-60 too, but I love being able to go 74 MPH in 2nd gear in my HR Z. It's a blast merging onto a highway like that!
Old 12-02-2008, 12:22 PM
  #18  
evil_tt
Banned
iTrader: (10)
 
evil_tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Orange Countizzle
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Its 80 pounds lighter and .2 liter bigger engine.....did you think it'd pull 0-60 in 4 seconds?
Old 12-02-2008, 01:15 PM
  #19  
bboypuertoroc
New Member
iTrader: (4)
 
bboypuertoroc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Get out my way pimpin, VA
Posts: 22,909
Received 2,446 Likes on 1,768 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by VQstl
Anything under 6 seconds in a quick car, under 5 very fast, under 4 is just ballistic.
I like being ballistic.
Old 12-02-2008, 02:02 PM
  #20  
supergoji
Registered User
 
supergoji's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mohegan Lake, NY
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hiz-n-herz
I you care about 0-60 so much, just swap in a final drive that will allow 2nd gear to top out at 62mph. Voila...

Some 4.08's might do it.

I like a fast 0-60 too, but I love being able to go 74 MPH in 2nd gear in my HR Z. It's a blast merging onto a highway like that!
in my friends 300zx twin turbo when he gets his bigger wheels and rev limit increased will be able to merge at like 85mph in 2nd lol.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Why does the 370z suck at 0-60?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:50 AM.