+ 370z vs bolted 350z HR +
02-22-2010, 06:39 PM
#121
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have a 370z, I would like to trade it for one of you guys older models bc of the better performance. I know my post count is low, but based on searching, I have found that the older version of the car is a little faster. I raced one.. and you guys were right. Just pm me if you want to trade.
ha.
ha.
02-22-2010, 07:04 PM
#122
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Dallas Tx.
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have a 370z, I would like to trade it for one of you guys older models bc of the better performance. I know my post count is low, but based on searching, I have found that the older version of the car is a little faster. I raced one.. and you guys were right. Just pm me if you want to trade.
ha.
ha.
02-22-2010, 08:17 PM
#123
And what did that car cost in the early-to-mid-90's? Wasn't it around $35-45k then, which by todays standards, would probably put it closer to $45-55k, if not more? So yes, the performance was better, but that comparison is about as plausible as comparing the RX-7 and RX-8. Same line of vehicle, but built in different times for different purposes. Same thing for the 300zx and the 350z. They built the Z on a stable N/A platform that was affordable to the mass public. There is a reason the Japanese supercars of the 90's like the RX-7, Supra, 300zx, and 3000GT VR-4 died off really haven't returned and affordable mid-range performance cars like the S2k, 350z, and others took their places.
02-23-2010, 02:49 AM
#128
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Rapid City, SD Ellsworth AFB
Posts: 1,447
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This thread is stupid. The funniest part is us Revup guys are looking at you all like why. The DE vs HR conversation shouldn't ever come up. The HR kills the DE. Drop the 1/4 mile times. Look at the power numbers. Why does it take a DE a full engine build to make the same power numbers as a HR? look at dyno plots. The HR's make much more power at a higher rpm also. For what the 350Z was built for is exactly what makes it superior to the DE. The Revup vs HR should be the real topic.
02-23-2010, 06:38 AM
#129
This thread is stupid. The funniest part is us Revup guys are looking at you all like why. The DE vs HR conversation shouldn't ever come up. The HR kills the DE. Drop the 1/4 mile times. Look at the power numbers. Why does it take a DE a full engine build to make the same power numbers as a HR? look at dyno plots. The HR's make much more power at a higher rpm also. For what the 350Z was built for is exactly what makes it superior to the DE. The Revup vs HR should be the real topic.
02-23-2010, 08:49 AM
#130
This thread is stupid. The funniest part is us Revup guys are looking at you all like why. The DE vs HR conversation shouldn't ever come up. The HR kills the DE. Drop the 1/4 mile times. Look at the power numbers. Why does it take a DE a full engine build to make the same power numbers as a HR? look at dyno plots. The HR's make much more power at a higher rpm also. For what the 350Z was built for is exactly what makes it superior to the DE. The Revup vs HR should be the real topic.
.
02-23-2010, 09:38 AM
#134
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: McAllen / San Antonio TX.
Posts: 2,087
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And what did that car cost in the early-to-mid-90's? Wasn't it around $35-45k then, which by todays standards, would probably put it closer to $45-55k, if not more? So yes, the performance was better, but that comparison is about as plausible as comparing the RX-7 and RX-8. Same line of vehicle, but built in different times for different purposes. Same thing for the 300zx and the 350z. They built the Z on a stable N/A platform that was affordable to the mass public. There is a reason the Japanese supercars of the 90's like the RX-7, Supra, 300zx, and 3000GT VR-4 died off really haven't returned and affordable mid-range performance cars like the S2k, 350z, and others took their places.
......dare i say SOLO 
.
Last edited by BaTMan_4; 02-23-2010 at 09:44 AM.
02-23-2010, 09:57 AM
#135
This thread is stupid. The funniest part is us Revup guys are looking at you all like why. The DE vs HR conversation shouldn't ever come up. The HR kills the DE. Drop the 1/4 mile times. Look at the power numbers. Why does it take a DE a full engine build to make the same power numbers as a HR? look at dyno plots. The HR's make much more power at a higher rpm also. For what the 350Z was built for is exactly what makes it superior to the DE. The Revup vs HR should be the real topic.
lmfao..this is epic fail at its best
