13.77@100.9 Best time for stock?
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
13.77@100.9 Best time for stock?
Motortrend ran a 13.77 on the track model in their new issue (from the pervious 13.97). So I suppose thats the best that can be done in stock form?
#2
Cranky FI Owner
iTrader: (14)
Re: 13.77@100.9 Best time for stock?
Originally posted by VQ35DES
Motortrend ran a 13.77 on the track model in their new issue (from the pervious 13.97). So I suppose thats the best that can be done in stock form?
Motortrend ran a 13.77 on the track model in their new issue (from the pervious 13.97). So I suppose thats the best that can be done in stock form?
#4
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
See sig.
The reason why there are some mid/low/14's high 13's runs is, because of different track location, different driver skill, weather, and different 350Z power levels (as we know the Z can dyno anywhere from 225whp-249whp).
The reason why there are some mid/low/14's high 13's runs is, because of different track location, different driver skill, weather, and different 350Z power levels (as we know the Z can dyno anywhere from 225whp-249whp).
#6
Registered User
Yes, it is true that random internet freaks are just as trustworthy as major publications......
I'm just glad that the numbers were confirmed by yet another source so that there is less of the "I call BS" whenever someone posts a good time.
Also, it just goes to show how variable these times can be.
-D'oh!
I'm just glad that the numbers were confirmed by yet another source so that there is less of the "I call BS" whenever someone posts a good time.
Also, it just goes to show how variable these times can be.
-D'oh!
Trending Topics
#8
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Very sad that no one believed me, my first run day i went out with my car to the track i ran a 14.2 very first run....By the end of the day my best was 13.899 @99.2 w/ 2.059 60ft, now thats 5AT, But i took out the spare......No one would believe me, but hey i know what my car does......
#10
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Dissolved
I think its funny how everyone here doubted our members who were running 13.7-13.8 stock. Yet when a magazine did it you're all of a sudden believers. :P
I think its funny how everyone here doubted our members who were running 13.7-13.8 stock. Yet when a magazine did it you're all of a sudden believers. :P
#11
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by JonsilvZ
I have that copy. Our Zs are pretty quick for a 3.5 V6. 0-100 was 13sec just like the LS1 Camaro! It spanked the S2 and RX8
I have that copy. Our Zs are pretty quick for a 3.5 V6. 0-100 was 13sec just like the LS1 Camaro! It spanked the S2 and RX8
#12
Originally posted by JonsilvZ
I have that copy. Our Zs are pretty quick for a 3.5 V6. 0-100 was 13sec just like the LS1 Camaro! It spanked the S2 and RX8
I have that copy. Our Zs are pretty quick for a 3.5 V6. 0-100 was 13sec just like the LS1 Camaro! It spanked the S2 and RX8
mine took 12.9 to hit 110
But on topic i was quite impressed with the Zs performance. Blew the other 2 away
#13
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: ________
Posts: 1,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by VQ35DES
you're not talking about me are you? i was always a believer
you're not talking about me are you? i was always a believer
#15
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Barrie, Ontario Canada
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How are these at the track? I'd like to lap with someone if I ever get the chance. I haven't had my S2000 for long and it was a tough decision between the 2.
However I did manage to hang with one at the track in my RSX-S last summer. I had quite a bit of suspension mods, and it IS very driver dependant.
If only I could have both
However I did manage to hang with one at the track in my RSX-S last summer. I had quite a bit of suspension mods, and it IS very driver dependant.
If only I could have both
#16
Registered User
Originally posted by JamRWS6
LS1 Camaros are 12 second 0-100 cars just FYI....
mine took 12.9 to hit 110
But on topic i was quite impressed with the Zs performance. Blew the other 2 away
LS1 Camaros are 12 second 0-100 cars just FYI....
mine took 12.9 to hit 110
But on topic i was quite impressed with the Zs performance. Blew the other 2 away
#17
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: California
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here this guy Jamrws6 comes again with his LS1 babble. A good runnin stock SS could trap around 105-108 on a good day with traction. There 0-100mph would range around high 12s, mid 13s. Since their truck engines were made with such low quality their hp ratings were not accurate, therefore evey dude with a LS1 powered car thinks he has a fac. freak hittin 12s at the track and pumpin out 320 to the wheels lol. Cmon old news go somewhere else with that bs man.
Last edited by 350ZPWNZU; 03-06-2004 at 07:09 AM.
#19
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: California
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
who said every SS is runnin low 13s? and ive seen more 105 or below traps than ever a 108, so a high 13 1/4 run with 105 trap, could equal a high 12s or low 13s run 0-100. Im talkin about the normal runnin SS's or other LS1 powered cars, the ones that show up on the legitmate magazines, or at the track. Your telling me that every LS1 powered car runs 0-100 in 12s flat, and picks up 10mph more in just .9 seconds?? lol
Last edited by 350ZPWNZU; 03-29-2004 at 12:02 PM.