Notices
Autocross/Road SCCA Solo II, SCCA Club Racing, Redline Track Events, Speed Trial, Speed Ventures, Grand-Am Cup, JGTC, Procar Australia

ST/SU Build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-20-2015, 11:35 PM
  #121  
armt350z
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
armt350z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 684
Received 74 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

The general rules for both SCCA and NASA are:

Seats: 5 years from date of manufacture, 5 additional years with a brace.

Window nets: SFI normally stamps them as good for 2 years, check the tag for expiration date. SCCA has never once looked at a window net tag on any cars I've been around.

Harnesses: FIA harnesses are good for 5 years from date of manufacture, SFI is good for 2 years from date of manufacture

Head and neck restraints: A more recent change to SFI 38.1 put in some verbage requiring an inspection by the manufacturer every 5 years. I have not seen this checked yet trackside but it may be coming.

Helmets: 10 years from the snell date. I'm actually not sure about FIA helmets though.
Old 12-21-2015, 08:22 AM
  #122  
dkmura
General & DIY Moderator
MY350Z.COM
iTrader: (64)
 
dkmura's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Aurora, Colorado
Posts: 8,358
Received 1,292 Likes on 896 Posts
Default

Correction on harness expiration dates: SCCA made a rule change in 2015 on SFI rated harnesses. They are now good for five years, just like the FIA rated ones. Not sure about NASA or other sanctioning bodies, but they usually follow SCCA's lead.
Old 12-21-2015, 10:22 AM
  #123  
armt350z
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
armt350z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 684
Received 74 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Thats great to hear, the cost, however ludicrous it may be, of maintaining a car just got better!
Old 12-21-2015, 10:47 AM
  #124  
90nissanS13
New Member
 
90nissanS13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Florida
Posts: 551
Received 49 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dkmura
Correction on harness expiration dates: SCCA made a rule change in 2015 on SFI rated harnesses. They are now good for five years, just like the FIA rated ones. Not sure about NASA or other sanctioning bodies, but they usually follow SCCA's lead.
To add to this, this was included in my last comment. I included a link to an SCCA rulebook.

Section 9.3.19, E, 1.
SFI rated expiration
Old 12-21-2015, 12:09 PM
  #125  
Dblock55
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Dblock55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The mitten state
Posts: 684
Received 32 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 90nissanS13
To add to this, this was included in my last comment. I included a link to an SCCA rulebook.

Section 9.3.19, E, 1.
SFI rated expiration
I've read the rule book, my question is more about the label long of the seat.
Old 12-21-2015, 02:54 PM
  #126  
dkmura
General & DIY Moderator
MY350Z.COM
iTrader: (64)
 
dkmura's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Aurora, Colorado
Posts: 8,358
Received 1,292 Likes on 896 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dblock55
I've read the rule book, my question is more about the label long of the seat.
What the hell? Please restate your question in english.
Old 12-21-2015, 05:23 PM
  #127  
Dblock55
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Dblock55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The mitten state
Posts: 684
Received 32 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dkmura
What the hell? Please restate your question in english.
My bad, I should really proofread my stuff... I blame spell check for making crazy assumptions!!! I meant "labeling of the seat".
Old 12-22-2015, 12:33 PM
  #128  
90nissanS13
New Member
 
90nissanS13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Florida
Posts: 551
Received 49 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

I spoke with tech. support at SCCA for clarification of the club racing rulebook. Any SFI rated seat within good condition is acceptable. The date isn't evaluated in race-car inspection to determine pass or fail. Proper and secure mounting is required, that's about all that is expected with a seat.

That is speaking for club racing, auto-cross is way more lenient with safety equipment.

Helmets and harnesses are required to be within the expiration date. No exception.
Old 12-22-2015, 03:20 PM
  #129  
Dblock55
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Dblock55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The mitten state
Posts: 684
Received 32 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 90nissanS13
I spoke with tech. support at SCCA for clarification of the club racing rulebook. Any SFI rated seat within good condition is acceptable. The date isn't evaluated in race-car inspection to determine pass or fail. Proper and secure mounting is required, that's about all that is expected with a seat.mi

That is speaking for club racing, auto-cross is way more lenient with safety equipment.

Helmets and harnesses are required to be within the expiration date. No exception.
Good to know, thanks for the clarification.
Old 12-22-2015, 08:18 PM
  #130  
dkmura
General & DIY Moderator
MY350Z.COM
iTrader: (64)
 
dkmura's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Aurora, Colorado
Posts: 8,358
Received 1,292 Likes on 896 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 90nissanS13
I spoke with tech. support at SCCA for clarification of the club racing rulebook. Any SFI rated seat within good condition is acceptable. The date isn't evaluated in race-car inspection to determine pass or fail. Proper and secure mounting is required, that's about all that is expected with a seat.

That is speaking for club racing, auto-cross is way more lenient with safety equipment.

Helmets and harnesses are required to be within the expiration date. No exception.
As an Z competitor with both NASA and SCCA experience, I have to say the seat certification label is more stringently evaluated by NASA. They have strict limits on how long a seat can be used before it must be replaced, or a seatback brace installed.

As an active SCCA tech inspector, I will inspect a composite seat to make sure there are no cracks or damage that would compromise the structure of the seat. For an aluminum seat, bends in the metal or signs of crash damage would disqualify the seat for competition purposes. Of course, stress marks in any mounting hardware or bent seat mounts would also preclude passing the car until the damage was repaired. Only after all of the above has been done will the seat certification label be examined.
Old 12-23-2015, 04:49 AM
  #131  
Dblock55
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Dblock55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The mitten state
Posts: 684
Received 32 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Thanks for chiming in Dkmura! Im going to be shooting for a 16MY seat... may just have to be patient...

So I think im done with the weight savings portion of the build, the cage is being installed in January and I know all the safety equipment I need to buy... my next focus will be upping the power my VQ is making. I have a DE that is pretty much bone stock currently. If I run ST3 and assuming the car will sit at 3000# with driver and fuel (I think itll be less) I can be working with 300hp to meet the 10:1 WT/HP ratio... being that my engine is stock im guessing im putting down something in the 240-250hp at the wheels. Not sure what the drivetrain losses are in the z. So my question is what is the best route to up the power for road racing purposes and get a nice torque curve. I already have straight exhaust (with stock headers).
I think ACT or JWT lightweight flywheel are a must... they wont add any power but they will "free up" some power that currently being wasted. Is anyone running a lightweight clutch? I believe the JWT kit just uses the stock clutch correct?
From what I gather 5/16 plenum spacer is a good idea and running a larger TB seems to help.
Obviously in the end ill need to go and get the engine tuned on a dyno.

What are your guys suggestions? What kind of untapped power does the VQ have from the factory? Most production engines arent producing peak power due to emissions and all so im wondering how much is left to squeeze out of the VQ bone stock with just a good tune?
Old 12-23-2015, 07:27 AM
  #132  
Dblock55
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Dblock55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The mitten state
Posts: 684
Received 32 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Also what are you guys using for your lightweight battery? Braille?
Old 12-23-2015, 07:56 AM
  #133  
dkmura
General & DIY Moderator
MY350Z.COM
iTrader: (64)
 
dkmura's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Aurora, Colorado
Posts: 8,358
Received 1,292 Likes on 896 Posts
Default

First things first: find a reliable performance shop nearby with a well-maintained dyno. Get a few baseline pulls done on the car FIRST, before you add anything else. A few things to add to your knowledge base on the VQ is that it likes rotational mass to reach optimum output. Lighter flywheel/clutch packages seem to allow the VQ to rev quicker, but there's a corresponding drop in top end. Testing with lighter flywheel packages found NO corresponding drop in lap times and that's coming from a Z racer who used to have the uber-lightweight Tilton street/track twin disc clutch and lightweight flywheel package. If I were you, I'd suggest the first mod would be to add test pipes, a lightweight single exhaust and an UpRev tune on unleaded race fuel. There are gains to be made there- just be ready to pay a skilled tuner for multiple pulls on the dyno to extract the best results.

As for batteries, and if the rules allow it, keep the bigger battery and relocate it towards the RR of the Z. That's always the lightest side when corner weighting and you can use both the reserve power (lightweight batteries suck in that regard) and weight to your advantage.

Sorry for the long post, but I've got some real-world experience on these topics to share.
Old 12-23-2015, 11:50 AM
  #134  
Dblock55
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Dblock55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The mitten state
Posts: 684
Received 32 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dkmura
First things first: find a reliable performance shop nearby with a well-maintained dyno. Get a few baseline pulls done on the car FIRST, before you add anything else. A few things to add to your knowledge base on the VQ is that it likes rotational mass to reach optimum output. Lighter flywheel/clutch packages seem to allow the VQ to rev quicker, but there's a corresponding drop in top end. Testing with lighter flywheel packages found NO corresponding drop in lap times and that's coming from a Z racer who used to have the uber-lightweight Tilton street/track twin disc clutch and lightweight flywheel package. If I were you, I'd suggest the first mod would be to add test pipes, a lightweight single exhaust and an UpRev tune on unleaded race fuel. There are gains to be made there- just be ready to pay a skilled tuner for multiple pulls on the dyno to extract the best results.

As for batteries, and if the rules allow it, keep the bigger battery and relocate it towards the RR of the Z. That's always the lightest side when corner weighting and you can use both the reserve power (lightweight batteries suck in that regard) and weight to your advantage.

Sorry for the long post, but I've got some real-world experience on these topics to share.
Dont apologize, this is the type of insight im looking for!! Its also value added that its coming from experience. There is nothing in the rule book against relocating batteries but im a bit confused, you said the RR is the lightest part of the car.. my LR is the lightest part of my car last time i weighed it (before gutting)... you sure you got that correct?
Already has test pipes and stainless single exhaust all the way to the back.
As for the Uprev tune, what in all is required to make this possible? Are the DE heads capable of being revved higher? I read about this a while back and remember being told that its not worth doing on a DE, gotta dig that post up. If you have any more info id be very interested.
Ill find a reputable tuner in the area and see if i cant get some numbers posted soon.
Thanks again for the advice!

Old 12-23-2015, 12:09 PM
  #135  
90nissanS13
New Member
 
90nissanS13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Florida
Posts: 551
Received 49 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

If you use the original battery location, Odyssey makes a good battery. A good friend ran one for about four years on a Civic Si. If you use the original battery, I second the idea of relocating to improve balance. You mentioned you are on a budget...relocating is much cheaper than a lightweight-battery with greater advantages.

dkmura's suggestion is a great place to start with "power".

Your goal is to be fast and with a budget? Don't mess with the engine right now. Gain driving experience and learn your car on the track. You have a gutted car, in theory, you just freed up a lot more hp than you could gain with a budget.

A fast driver with 250hp is better than a slow driver with 450hp.
Old 12-23-2015, 12:11 PM
  #136  
90nissanS13
New Member
 
90nissanS13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Florida
Posts: 551
Received 49 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

What is the gutted weight?
Old 12-23-2015, 06:14 PM
  #137  
dkmura
General & DIY Moderator
MY350Z.COM
iTrader: (64)
 
dkmura's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Aurora, Colorado
Posts: 8,358
Received 1,292 Likes on 896 Posts
Default

Are you corner weighting your Z with a corresponding weight in the driver's seat? Your cross-weights are quite different than mine.

Also, building a NA VQ race engine is quite expensive and complex. Make that a future project and take your time in researching it. Otherwise, spend your budget on getting an UpRev cable with Osiris and Cipher loaded on it.
Old 12-24-2015, 09:29 AM
  #138  
03threefiftyz
350Z-holic
iTrader: (25)
 
03threefiftyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Frederick, MD
Posts: 9,848
Received 117 Likes on 63 Posts
Default

800lb cross-weight up front is less than my 2800lb race car....
Old 12-25-2015, 12:07 AM
  #139  
Dblock55
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Dblock55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The mitten state
Posts: 684
Received 32 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 03threefiftyz
800lb cross-weight up front is less than my 2800lb race car....
Not sure I understand... csn you elaborate.
Old 12-25-2015, 09:25 AM
  #140  
03threefiftyz
350Z-holic
iTrader: (25)
 
03threefiftyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Frederick, MD
Posts: 9,848
Received 117 Likes on 63 Posts
Default

That 786lb RF corner weight is not possible unless there has been an error (on a a hill, etc)...


Quick Reply: ST/SU Build



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:09 PM.