Top 25 1/4 Mile Times For ( TT, ST, SuperCharger, Nitrous, Bolt-ons, Stock )
12-11-2006, 07:06 PM
#121
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Austin
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Integrity
+2
Keep the list clean and simple. Individuals can put as much information as they wish into a post inside the thread. Then readers can simply scroll through the thread to find more information on any of the screen names from the list.
Keep the list clean and simple. Individuals can put as much information as they wish into a post inside the thread. Then readers can simply scroll through the thread to find more information on any of the screen names from the list.
12-11-2006, 11:04 PM
#122
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: B'ham Al
Posts: 1,949
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wow, 1.57 is only .003 slower than the fastest 60' on the board. And it was done by a twin turbo. Thats faster than all the single turbo guys, 13 of the twin guys, all the supercharged and nitrous guys. I searched for the timeslip in the thread and don't see it. Id like to see the slip. Not calling BS < just like to see the whole timeline.
12-11-2006, 11:36 PM
#123
12-12-2006, 05:13 AM
#124
Originally Posted by davidv
Trust is important. I like to see time slips rather than members PMing them to you. If you can PM a time slip you can certainly post it.
Members will police one another. A member posts a stock time slip for November 2006. Another member might look at previous posts and find one for August 2006 saying Guys I just installed my headers and they are awesome. Busted!
Members will police one another. A member posts a stock time slip for November 2006. Another member might look at previous posts and find one for August 2006 saying Guys I just installed my headers and they are awesome. Busted!
But yeah, its a better idea to have them all posted on this thread.
I have the list updated with all the info that was sent to me.
Thanks guys
Todd
12-12-2006, 05:45 AM
#125
Banned
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,393
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by davidv
Trust is important. I like to see time slips rather than members PMing them to you. If you can PM a time slip you can certainly post it.
Members will police one another. A member posts a stock time slip for November 2006. Another member might look at previous posts and find one for August 2006 saying Guys I just installed my headers and they are awesome. Busted!
Members will police one another. A member posts a stock time slip for November 2006. Another member might look at previous posts and find one for August 2006 saying Guys I just installed my headers and they are awesome. Busted!
12-12-2006, 08:16 AM
#126
i think that if there is a fluke that is unbelievable , it should be backed up. i mean, most of the times are great and with in reach but something like that is just crazy.
that 1.57 60 foot would be really hard to achieve NA, and most of us know that our 60 foot times are usually consistent with what we are doing and fall within a .02 second range give or take...
possible that car was staged on back tires?? i have seen it countless times...
that 1.57 60 foot would be really hard to achieve NA, and most of us know that our 60 foot times are usually consistent with what we are doing and fall within a .02 second range give or take...
possible that car was staged on back tires?? i have seen it countless times...
owned
12-14-2006, 11:47 AM
#137
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: south east
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by aceman
Naw, he was right, i changed it
Its all good, im glad you guys catch my mistakes.
Later
Todd
Its all good, im glad you guys catch my mistakes.
Later
Todd
BigO109
12-14-2006, 12:52 PM
#138
Retired Admin
iTrader: (95)
Originally Posted by aceman
Naw, he was right, i changed it
Its all good, im glad you guys catch my mistakes.
Later
Todd
Its all good, im glad you guys catch my mistakes.
Later
Todd
12-14-2006, 08:13 PM
#139
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 5,998
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't have the slip anymore, but in October this year I ran a 14.7something @ 94mph (spacer/injen intake, 275 p-zero's) and believe the 60' was 2.1 or so. This was on an '04.5 AT.
I'm not asking to have my time listed because it just doesn't compare. I live in Vegas and the DA for that particular day was over 5500'. Also what screwed my time was not realizing that I coulda ran 3rd til the end of the trap (which I'll do next time).
The question I have is this... How is this ranking list fair to someone who races at elevation? Or are there telltale numbers on the slip that gives up the fact the vehicle is running fast (even though ET/trap) is high? I've made several passes at the strip but am not sure how all the numbers correllate.
In the spring when the strip here opens back up, I'll post a slip and hopefully get it dissected by the gurus here.
I'm not asking to have my time listed because it just doesn't compare. I live in Vegas and the DA for that particular day was over 5500'. Also what screwed my time was not realizing that I coulda ran 3rd til the end of the trap (which I'll do next time).
The question I have is this... How is this ranking list fair to someone who races at elevation? Or are there telltale numbers on the slip that gives up the fact the vehicle is running fast (even though ET/trap) is high? I've made several passes at the strip but am not sure how all the numbers correllate.
In the spring when the strip here opens back up, I'll post a slip and hopefully get it dissected by the gurus here.
12-14-2006, 09:32 PM
#140
Originally Posted by HDPD350Z
The question I have is this... How is this ranking list fair to someone who races at elevation? Or are there telltale numbers on the slip that gives up the fact the vehicle is running fast (even though ET/trap) is high? I've made several passes at the strip but am not sure how all the numbers correllate.
I have accumulated several years of time slips, and must judge the difference between my skills (or lack of) and how the car is performing. Keep in mind that I am competing, and selecting an accurate dial-in is critical.
Here is a typical practice run where I am sloppy but the car is running well. During the second 660 feet I am picking up 22 mpg. Thats good for me. But a 2.1 second 60 foot time is sloppy: I can run 2.0 seconds. For my first round of eliminations I might dial-in 13.58 seconds because I know that the car is capable of 13.58 seconds.
Last edited by davidv; 12-14-2006 at 09:35 PM.