RevUp Oil Consumption TSB and discussion
#61
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: N.VA
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 97supratt
One thing I do not understand is this. If it is the ECM that has too much valve overlap then all the 05-06 REVUPS should be affected right? Well they aren't, some have oil consumption problems (1 qt every 1k miles), and some don't.
#62
Registered User
iTrader: (61)
Originally Posted by mikead_99
That's my biggest issue with a lot of the theories out there. Again, so far so good for me, but I still have concerns here. I like the bad batch of parts theory better, but I'm not convinced this has been clearly correlated to manufacturing dates either. Doesn't seems like rings if you aren't finding anything in the catch can, but could believe something with the valve stems or the guide area was out of tolerance in a batch. Maybe a combo of sloppy tolerances plus the timing?
My car runs strong, and is very healthy. I have checked and replaced my plugs and the original ones had no oil residue or any implication of oil burn-off. Even the honda B-series motors lose oil, when an engine is being used in the upper rpm's you can literally smell the oil being burned if you are behind them. It's a normal thing, especially on high compression or forced induction motors.
So the 1 qt every 1k mile thing is actually correct, if its less than that it could be caused by high rpm use and some oil being sucked in through the stem seals.
#63
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rome Italy
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
good for you my friend. in the meantime, my fellow italian 35th anniv owner has had his motor opened up by nissan and surprise surprise piston heads are coved by a thick layer of black muck. never really raced and 56k kms on the clock. bad batch of valves? dunno, just want the problem solved. would like some feedback from someone there in the US that has actually managed to solve this problem. and it is a pretty bad one too
#65
Registered User
iTrader: (61)
Originally Posted by 350Z_LMS
good for you my friend. in the meantime, my fellow italian 35th anniv owner has had his motor opened up by nissan and surprise surprise piston heads are coved by a thick layer of black muck. never really raced and 56k kms on the clock. bad batch of valves? dunno, just want the problem solved. would like some feedback from someone there in the US that has actually managed to solve this problem. and it is a pretty bad one too
I would definitely try the catch can approch and find out if the catch can even caught any oil in the form of a liquid. If it doesn't then it is definitely coming from the stem seals.
#66
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rome Italy
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
friend has ARC oil catch can...empty. black muck is "thick" (1mm approx). friend also has an S14 silvia with 160k kms on the clock and an open engine. cilinders are "clean" in comparison. stem seals I suppose, nissan hopefully will look into that too...we'll see. no sign of oil burning from the exhaust though. weird stuff
#67
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 350Z_LMS
@alrific: what you say makes perfect sense. Do you know of any customer that has had this issue solved by reprogrmming the ecm? in other words, do techline USA have a record of the number of requests they have had from customers with the same problem? Also, 1/2 QT is approx 1/2 liter right? 1000miles=1600km OK. So in EU terms, Nissan suggest approx 1/3 liter in 1000km...I'm getting roughly 1liter in 1200-1500km! roughly 2,5 times the suggested consumption. Anyway, that's me. Let's hear about others and most of all let's see if Nissan are solving the problem this way. I mean how many revups have been sold in the US? They have to get it solved!
#68
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 97supratt
One thing I do not understand is this. If it is the ECM that has too much valve overlap then all the 05-06 REVUPS should be affected right? Well they aren't, some have oil consumption problems (1 qt every 1k miles), and some don't.
#69
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: memphis
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've got an 06 burning oil and it's good to hear that Nissan actually knows about the problem, and is trying to do something about it. My question is though I've heard a number of people having their cams scorched because lack of oil, I have suspicions that it's happened to me and how would I go about it getting checked out by Nissan, and know if they're telling the truth or not if they say they haven't been scorched?
#70
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rome Italy
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by alrific
I've seen this question answered, and its probably in the top 100, but plz humor me. What do you mean by REVUP??? I pay very little attention to new model info, hell I don't pay attention to product info at all. I'm all about fixing and diagnosing.
#71
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Seattle WA
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 97supratt
I honestly don't think I have a oil consumption problem. If you race your car, you should expect it to lose a quart or two quarts by 3k miles, especially synthetic oil.
My car runs strong, and is very healthy. I have checked and replaced my plugs and the original ones had no oil residue or any implication of oil burn-off. Even the honda B-series motors lose oil, when an engine is being used in the upper rpm's you can literally smell the oil being burned if you are behind them. It's a normal thing, especially on high compression or forced induction motors.
So the 1 qt every 1k mile thing is actually correct, if its less than that it could be caused by high rpm use and some oil being sucked in through the stem seals.
My car runs strong, and is very healthy. I have checked and replaced my plugs and the original ones had no oil residue or any implication of oil burn-off. Even the honda B-series motors lose oil, when an engine is being used in the upper rpm's you can literally smell the oil being burned if you are behind them. It's a normal thing, especially on high compression or forced induction motors.
So the 1 qt every 1k mile thing is actually correct, if its less than that it could be caused by high rpm use and some oil being sucked in through the stem seals.
If you think 1 quart per 1k miles is normal then how come there are thousands of Z's that are driven hard and hardly consume anything? This is not even a forced induction car or ridiculously high compression. I've had chipped turbo charged cars that I beat the crap out of and didn't consume more than a thimble full of oil every 4k-5k miles. And the Z I've actually driven very conservatively. I didn't have it long enough to really drive hard before I noticed the consumption(at 2200 miles).
So why then would a car that rarely sees full throttle and usually driven at 25%-50% be consuming that much oil?
How many other high performance cars burn that much oil when driven hard?
We're talking about modern cars, not something designed in the 50's. Car engines are way more precisely manufactured than they were even 10 years ago.
The worst part about this problem is nobody really knows for sure why this is happening and until they have something "official" Nissan is just blowing smoke up everybodys' you know what.
#72
Registered User
iTrader: (61)
Originally Posted by Brocken
I strongly disagree with your last statement. Actually, pretty much all of what you said about consumption being normal. That's the same bs that Nissan is trying to sell.
If you think 1 quart per 1k miles is normal then how come there are thousands of Z's that are driven hard and hardly consume anything? This is not even a forced induction car or ridiculously high compression. I've had chipped turbo charged cars that I beat the crap out of and didn't consume more than a thimble full of oil every 4k-5k miles. And the Z I've actually driven very conservatively. I didn't have it long enough to really drive hard before I noticed the consumption(at 2200 miles).
So why then would a car that rarely sees full throttle and usually driven at 25%-50% be consuming that much oil?
How many other high performance cars burn that much oil when driven hard?
We're talking about modern cars, not something designed in the 50's. Car engines are way more precisely manufactured than they were even 10 years ago.
The worst part about this problem is nobody really knows for sure why this is happening and until they have something "official" Nissan is just blowing smoke up everybodys' you know what.
If you think 1 quart per 1k miles is normal then how come there are thousands of Z's that are driven hard and hardly consume anything? This is not even a forced induction car or ridiculously high compression. I've had chipped turbo charged cars that I beat the crap out of and didn't consume more than a thimble full of oil every 4k-5k miles. And the Z I've actually driven very conservatively. I didn't have it long enough to really drive hard before I noticed the consumption(at 2200 miles).
So why then would a car that rarely sees full throttle and usually driven at 25%-50% be consuming that much oil?
How many other high performance cars burn that much oil when driven hard?
We're talking about modern cars, not something designed in the 50's. Car engines are way more precisely manufactured than they were even 10 years ago.
The worst part about this problem is nobody really knows for sure why this is happening and until they have something "official" Nissan is just blowing smoke up everybodys' you know what.
I think you misunderstood my statement, I should have worded it differently.
#73
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: So. cal.
Posts: 673
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I finally got a normal reading from the dipstick. I checked it after the car sat overnight, and in about 900 miles of pretty hard driving, it only burned about 1/4 quart. IMO this still isnt acceptable, but its going to be difficult convincing nissan that its a problem. So this would be 3/4 quart in 3k miles. I was beating on it so it would consume a little more than usual durring the consumption test but it didnt work out. There has to be more than 1 flaw with this motor. Some people are consuming A LOT of oil, yet my car consumes a lot less. Or maybe its just 1 flaw, but the severity varies. For example maybe on some motors, the rings seat better than others??
#74
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rome Italy
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brocken
I strongly disagree with your last statement. Actually, pretty much all of what you said about consumption being normal. That's the same bs that Nissan is trying to sell.
If you think 1 quart per 1k miles is normal then how come there are thousands of Z's that are driven hard and hardly consume anything? This is not even a forced induction car or ridiculously high compression. I've had chipped turbo charged cars that I beat the crap out of and didn't consume more than a thimble full of oil every 4k-5k miles. And the Z I've actually driven very conservatively. I didn't have it long enough to really drive hard before I noticed the consumption(at 2200 miles).
So why then would a car that rarely sees full throttle and usually driven at 25%-50% be consuming that much oil?
How many other high performance cars burn that much oil when driven hard?
We're talking about modern cars, not something designed in the 50's. Car engines are way more precisely manufactured than they were even 10 years ago.
The worst part about this problem is nobody really knows for sure why this is happening and until they have something "official" Nissan is just blowing smoke up everybodys' you know what.
If you think 1 quart per 1k miles is normal then how come there are thousands of Z's that are driven hard and hardly consume anything? This is not even a forced induction car or ridiculously high compression. I've had chipped turbo charged cars that I beat the crap out of and didn't consume more than a thimble full of oil every 4k-5k miles. And the Z I've actually driven very conservatively. I didn't have it long enough to really drive hard before I noticed the consumption(at 2200 miles).
So why then would a car that rarely sees full throttle and usually driven at 25%-50% be consuming that much oil?
How many other high performance cars burn that much oil when driven hard?
We're talking about modern cars, not something designed in the 50's. Car engines are way more precisely manufactured than they were even 10 years ago.
The worst part about this problem is nobody really knows for sure why this is happening and until they have something "official" Nissan is just blowing smoke up everybodys' you know what.
#75
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rome Italy
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#76
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 350Z_LMS
@alrific: the revup is the 300HP motor with VVT, surely you must know about different versions of the VQ! please let us know any additional info you might source on the issue, thanks so much
REVUP is just not a term we use in da shop.
#77
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rome Italy
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
if people want to solve this problem, we need info from other owners and from nissan techline. from the feedback on this thread and other threads, looks like a large number have problems. keep the info coming please
#78
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Did someone say long block??
You guys are never gonna believe this. I've spent the last several days asking around the shop to see who has done what about consumption and trying to get my shop foreman to pry some info out of his contacts at Nissan. And I've gotten next to nothing. The guys who have dealt w/oil burners have not been able to get their customers to return for follow ups and Nissan ain't talking. Was about to let it go when a tech pulled me aside and told me he had one. This car came in 2mths ago, less than 800mi on it and 3qts low on oil. Techline had the tech start an oil consumption test and told the cust to return in 700mi. That was the last we saw of him. Customer has since put on 2000mi and was 3qts low(again). This time Techline was all over the problem. They wanted to know everything about his driving habits, daily driven, driven hard or babied, short or long trips, everything. Long story short Nissan told us to put a long block in it. More importantly they were very specific about wanting the entire engine back, most especially they don't want us to remove the VVT solenoids. I'm guessing that soon as this thing gets back to Nissan its going on the engine dyno for some serious testing. Read into this what you want, but it looks like Nissan doesn't know if its a hardware or software problem.
#79
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
P.S.- I would really appreciate some feedback from everyone thats been following this thread. If your dealers do a reprogram and it works plz tell me, if you get a long block plz tell me.
I don't wanna get a rep for spreading bad info, and I'm very curious to know how things are working worldwide.
I don't wanna get a rep for spreading bad info, and I'm very curious to know how things are working worldwide.
#80
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Appreciate all the info you are providing. Continue to do so and keep probing as much as possible. The service reps here in Richmond, VA did not have a clue about oil burning issues with the 06 MT Zs. Mine burns 1/2 qt per 1,000 miles and the tail pipes, right at the bottom, do turn black, like oil or soot is being burned. Just like my diesel VW did. I may have them do an oil consumption test the next time it is time to have the oil changed just to document it, but I do not want a new engine or reprograming until they figure it out. Hopefully it is a software issue but fixing it will likely decrease the cars HP output.