Notices
Engine & Drivetrain VQ Power and Delivery

HP loss, due to elevation formula

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-10-2003, 05:25 AM
  #1  
jesseenglish
New Member
Thread Starter
 
jesseenglish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default HP loss, due to elevation formula

HP LOSS = ([elevation in feet] x 0.03 x [HP at sea level]) / 1000

HP loss is NOT dependant on the amount of horsepower you have, it's actually a percentage. The higher you are, the higer the percentage is. It doesn't matter if you have 50 or 5000 horsepower, at 5800 ASL you drop 17.4% of your power because of the lesser oxygen at the higher altitude. You can get this 17.4% figure by substituting the [HP at sea level] as 1.

% HP LOSS = (ALT x 0.03 x 1) / 1000

% HP LOSS = 5800 x 0.03 x 1 = 174/1000 = 0.174 or 17.4% HP loss at 5800 feet ASL.


Given this formula, in Colorado Springs, CO at 6090 feet elevation, my Z has an 18.2% HP loss or 234HP. This sucks!!
Old 07-10-2003, 10:31 AM
  #2  
350zdanny
Registered User
 
350zdanny's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Central Jersey
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That does blow. Does your Z feel sluggish at that elevation? I'm at sea level, so I don't know what that would be like, but I'd hate it!
Old 07-10-2003, 10:42 AM
  #3  
GrYpS
Registered User
 
GrYpS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Wouldn't this formula only apply to NA engines?

Good excuse to get a blower.
Old 07-10-2003, 11:04 AM
  #4  
bshockley
Registered User
 
bshockley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Duluth, MN
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: HP loss, due to elevation formula

Originally posted by jesseenglish
HP LOSS = ([elevation in feet] x 0.03 x [HP at sea level]) / 1000

HP loss is NOT dependant on the amount of horsepower you have, it's actually a percentage. The higher you are, the higer the percentage is. It doesn't matter if you have 50 or 5000 horsepower, at 5800 ASL you drop 17.4% of your power because of the lesser oxygen at the higher altitude. You can get this 17.4% figure by substituting the [HP at sea level] as 1.

% HP LOSS = (ALT x 0.03 x 1) / 1000

% HP LOSS = 5800 x 0.03 x 1 = 174/1000 = 0.174 or 17.4% HP loss at 5800 feet ASL.


Given this formula, in Colorado Springs, CO at 6090 feet elevation, my Z has an 18.2% HP loss or 234HP. This sucks!!
You should try taking a little Cessna 172 up to 8000 feet. Especially on somewhat hot days...
Old 07-10-2003, 12:14 PM
  #5  
Juztin
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Juztin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Los Lunas, NM
Posts: 2,027
Received 29 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

LOL,

I feel your pain as I'm in denver around @ 5400 feet asl. That means that also with drivetrain loss factored in... lets say 16% drive-train loss, the hp @ the wheels would be around 190 HP +/- 10. Hmmmmmmmmmm...... I'd say that my car pulls pretty good, but since we are all runnin sucky a$$ cause of the elevation, I think I should hit a dyno soon!!!
Old 07-10-2003, 12:28 PM
  #6  
jesseenglish
New Member
Thread Starter
 
jesseenglish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yeah, I drove up to Rampart Range Reservoir last weekend around 8700 ft and it felt like I was driving an S2000. It really sucked.


Edit: Oh yeah, and I forgot to figure in drivetrain loss. I can't wait to get my supercharger.
Old 07-10-2003, 01:08 PM
  #7  
bshockley
Registered User
 
bshockley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Duluth, MN
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by jesseenglish
Yeah, I drove up to Rampart Range Reservoir last weekend around 8700 ft and it felt like I was driving an S2000. It really sucked.


Edit: Oh yeah, and I forgot to figure in drivetrain loss. I can't wait to get my supercharger.
I wonder if you could get a variable boost supercharger and hook it up to an altimeter.


You could keep it at a constant 300hp.
Old 07-10-2003, 01:11 PM
  #8  
jesseenglish
New Member
Thread Starter
 
jesseenglish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

No, but you could do that with a turbocharger setup with a variable boost controller.
Old 07-10-2003, 01:28 PM
  #9  
GrYpS
Registered User
 
GrYpS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by bshockley
I wonder if you could get a variable boost supercharger and hook it up to an altimeter.


You could keep it at a constant 300hp.

Mhm, i don't think hp is affected by altitude in a forced induction engine because the air is compressed into the engine therefore the atmospheric pressure outside shouldn't matter.
Old 07-10-2003, 01:54 PM
  #10  
jesseenglish
New Member
Thread Starter
 
jesseenglish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by GrYpS
Mhm, i don't think hp is affected by altitude in a forced induction engine because the air is compressed into the engine therefore the atmospheric pressure outside shouldn't matter.

I've never really delved that deeply into wastegates or Bypass valves before, but let me explain how I've always understood it.

A wastegate, be it electronic or manual has to overcome atmospheric pressure, plus whatever PSI the wastegate is rated at.

If it was as you said, someone at higher elevations wouldn't get as much boost, the wastegate would open early because there would be less atmospheric pressure to overcome.

Now unless your wastegate is in a vacuum you should always have to overcome atmospheric pressure. Just like opening a hatch underwater, you've got to overcome the outside water pressure, plus whatever the weight of the hatch is.

So unless I'm totally wrong, which is possible. A person at higher elevations won't have as much power as another with the exact same FI setup at lower elevations.

Any analog boost meter that you see is simply using a barometer type device, comparing outside Air pressure to boost pressure. I do know that for a fact.

Last edited by jesseenglish; 07-10-2003 at 01:58 PM.
Old 07-10-2003, 03:54 PM
  #11  
350zdanny
Registered User
 
350zdanny's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Central Jersey
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Someone was saying that you lose boost pressure at altitude with a supercharger.

I don't think that is the case with turbos, but they have to work harder to push in the thinner air. I think that's how it works, but I'm not sure. SCC had an article on it.
Old 07-10-2003, 04:00 PM
  #12  
jesseenglish
New Member
Thread Starter
 
jesseenglish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

To get the same kind of HP at higher elevations you've got to figure in pressure drop at your elevation.

To get technical you're engine is seeing more than your 7PSI of boost it's actually seeing absolute pressure which at sea level would be 14.7PSI + amount of boost. So assuming you're running 7 PSI of boost that's 21.7 PSI absolute pressure.

(.47 x elevation)/1000

It's approximately .47 PSI drop for every 1000 ft in elevation. So at 5000ft elevation you've got approximately a 2.35PSI drop.

To get the same amount of power you've got to increase your pulley by 2 PSI for a supercharger.

In a turbocharger you've got to bump up your spring (in a mechanical wastegate), or if you're really high tech adjust your boost up by 2 psi with an adjustable wastegate controller.

So it's actually safer on my engine to run the supercharger at my elevation than at sea level (although I won't get as much power)

Last edited by jesseenglish; 07-10-2003 at 04:02 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MAsSIVrOOM
Engine & Drivetrain
2
10-20-2023 10:50 AM
apex locator
Autocross/Road
10
07-23-2021 02:27 AM
Colombo
Forced Induction
35
11-09-2020 10:27 AM
ablaine
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z
51
11-29-2016 10:13 AM



Quick Reply: HP loss, due to elevation formula



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:35 PM.