You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!
The car ran 11.8@118 on 9psi on stock suspension. I went a different route with the cars setup that it wasnt worth drag racing after that.
We went towards road racing/drifting.
At 5800ft, 11's isnt a true time at 9psi. Post ACTUAL times not corrected BS.
Also share 60ft, 1/8 info and tires used. 11.8 @ 118mph sounds like a GTECH time lol...
at 5800 ft above sea level, you are approx 3 psi less air pressure than at sea level.
you should post your actual numbers....not some corrected number. If you are at 5800ft, you AREN'T making the power that you are posting!!!! there is no sense in posting corrected numbers...... keep the boost set at those levels and then dyno your car at a sea level dyno.....and watch it blow up!!!!!!
I will try and dig up the time slip it was a year ago. I will get you guys the uncorrected numbers no biggie, I wouldnt be surprised if its right around 500whp uncorrected or just shy of that. I also mentioned it was on a dyno jet. I am running RC injectors, I think I also mentioned some where in there that I am running 114octane. Oh burberto I was running the Mickey thompson et-streets, on a 17" wheel.
This funny, because I totally was expecting all the flame from a few on here. Keep on flamin.
Went and abused the **** out of it tonight, guess what I still drove it home in one piece. I will do more next weekend too, hmm maybe I will throw in a set of bigger injectors and turn it up some more, I gotta hang with the sea level gods. Whats the highest hp stock block "uncorrected number" so far?
+1. RobertK tried to pass off his corrected numbers as being legit and everyone called him on it.
I think one of your guys from cincity moved to denver, maybe he should come by to see for himself? He knows who I am and where my shop is. We could also do a interview if you guys would like? Live feed too?
I will try and dig up the time slip it was a year ago. I will get you guys the uncorrected numbers no biggie, I wouldnt be surprised if its right around 500whp uncorrected or just shy of that. I also mentioned it was on a dyno jet. I am running RC injectors, I think I also mentioned some where in there that I am running 114octane. Oh burberto I was running the Mickey thompson et-streets, on a 17" wheel.
This funny, because I totally was expecting all the flame from a few on here. Keep on flamin.
Went and abused the **** out of it tonight, guess what I still drove it home in one piece. I will do more next weekend too, hmm maybe I will throw in a set of bigger injectors and turn it up some more, I gotta hang with the sea level gods. Whats the highest hp stock block "uncorrected number" so far?
Ouch . . . .
Nice build + numbers + races . . . . who gives a fawk about numbers the car is fast and vids prove it.
__________________
350Z with bolt-ons, reflash, and tune.
You stated it ran 11's at 9psi, then in the video it says 500+whp Z? You claim 9psi = mid 400's corrected....
So you ran 11's at 13+psi? That would make sense at that altitude, I dont buy the 9psi running 11's at altitude. BTW-Im not flaming you, Im asking you questions, get the wadded panties out of your cooch...
You stated it ran 11's at 9psi, then in the video it says 500+whp Z? You claim 9psi = mid 400's corrected....
So you ran 11's at 13+psi? That would make sense at that altitude, I dont buy the 9psi running 11's at altitude. BTW-Im not flaming you, Im asking you questions, get the wadded panties out of your cooch...
Hahaha, the person who took the video claim of 500whp is wrong, it was more like 470-480ish at that time (tuned aggressively), it was 9psi on the map. I wasnt running a boost controller back when that video was taken, what the previous owner did was upgrade the WGs springs.
Doug, I am prepared on that part too. Injectors were at 95% duty cycle
The car pretty much is in Grenade mode!! I have a couple of 500whp evos, 600hp mustang to take care of on the enclosed race track tonight. I will be surprised if I actually drive it home.
At 5800ft, 11's isnt a true time at 9psi. Post ACTUAL times not corrected BS.
11.8 @ 118mph sounds like a GTECH time lol...
those dont sound like questions to me....perhaps someone else has their panties in a bunch he showed you the videos of the car running the times he said it ran. the funniest part to me was the fact that right after you post your claim of corrected times he provides solid track video...im pretty sure Bandimere Speedway doesnt give corrected numbers lol. or have their timing system provided by GTECH.
ive personally been in the car filming plenty of times while it was on 9psi...and it was nasty. since im sure some are too lazy to search for them themselves, here is the link for another video of the car being put through plenty of abuse on 9psi Denver Racing
i have plenty more video of it on 13 and 16lbs but im pretty busy with stuff for a DVD coming soon so you will have to wait to see those.
the car makes power, definitely gets put through abuse, and does every form of racing almost lol...the damn thing just doesnt want to blow up yet. thats saying something for the tuning. able to make good power safely.
so ...dont get mad that some people know what they are doing up here, and can go faster than you can down at low altitude im just kidding that was mean... but hey give him his due credit, its tough to be quick up here
at 5800 ft above sea level, you are approx 3 psi less air pressure than at sea level.
you should post your actual numbers....not some corrected number. If you are at 5800ft, you AREN'T making the power that you are posting!!!! there is no sense in posting corrected numbers...... keep the boost set at those levels and then dyno your car at a sea level dyno.....and watch it blow up!!!!!!
Put the "newb hammer" away and don't be fawking haters
He posted his numbers and the correction factor so anyone who knows how to do simple math should be able to figure it out. Not to worried about if you are just lazy or we-todd-did but here it is
9.5psi the car made 448whp 444tq on 91 octane
13psi the car made 560whp 562tq on 114 octane
16psi-15psi the car made 597whp 618tq 114 octane
With a correction factor of 1.18 that means the raw numbers are
380, 474, 506
Gee my brain hurts now
Edit:
Oh and the comment about a correction factor at the track, WOW, not sure where you race but that is the most bizarre thing I think I have ever heard
Last edited by MzIntegrity; 11-25-2008 at 11:45 AM.
Reason: Add comment regarding timeslip
Put the "newb hammer" away and don't be fawking haters
He posted his numbers and the correction factor so anyone who knows how to do simple math should be able to figure it out. Not to worried about if you are just lazy or we-todd-did but here it is
9.5psi the car made 448whp 444tq on 91 octane
13psi the car made 560whp 562tq on 114 octane
16psi-15psi the car made 597whp 618tq 114 octane
With a correction factor of 1.18 that means the raw numbers are
380, 474, 506
Gee my brain hurts now
Edit:
Oh and the comment about a correction factor at the track, WOW, not sure where you race but that is the most bizarre thing I think I have ever heard
i think all the numbers you posted are at the two extreme ends of the spectrum. i think the true numbers are kinda in the middle. i think the guy you quoted is right, why even make any corrections?
he showed you the videos of the car running the times he said it ran. the funniest part to me was the fact that right after you post your claim of corrected times he provides solid track video...im pretty sure Bandimere Speedway doesnt give corrected numbers lol. or have their timing system provided by GTECH. 
on 9psi
