Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Stock MAF vs Uprev GT MAF

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-03-2012, 05:15 PM
  #41  
djamps
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
djamps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: MD
Posts: 4,492
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Massairdirect
I'm not sure what people are talking about in reguards to resolution. The A.D.C. in the pcm is always the same. The HPX sensor will show changes as small as 2 KG/HR from .1v to 5V.

If you are looking for more resolution in the pcm you simply need to use more maf data points at the lower end of the maf range and less at the top.
Resolution has nothing to do with the actual MAF output. It has everything to do with the data points you chose to enter into the PCM.

Hopefully this helps
Well I got my PMAS about a year ago (right about when they became practically unavailable) and it has crap resolution at idle. In fact with engine off it still shows about 0.7 volts and voltage slowly drops at WOT gear after gear at the 1/4 track. you can see the voltage actually go backwards in the logs as RPMs increase on a hard pull. Not only that, but it seems every PMAS has different transfer functions down low so by replacing it you have to rework some of the tune. I was able to 'tune around' the idle stuff for the most part but it's still nothing like stock.

Last edited by djamps; 01-03-2012 at 05:24 PM.
Old 01-04-2012, 07:56 AM
  #42  
Massairdirect
Registered User
 
Massairdirect's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by djamps
Well I got my PMAS about a year ago (right about when they became practically unavailable) and it has crap resolution at idle. In fact with engine off it still shows about 0.7 volts and voltage slowly drops at WOT gear after gear at the 1/4 track. you can see the voltage actually go backwards in the logs as RPMs increase on a hard pull. Not only that, but it seems every PMAS has different transfer functions down low so by replacing it you have to rework some of the tune. I was able to 'tune around' the idle stuff for the most part but it's still nothing like stock.
As I said, you can have more resolution down low by using more data points in the lower half of the curve. The voltage with the car not running is unreliable, the sensor needs air moving across it to start reading.

.7V is only about 4 KG/HR, way below anything seen entering any engine aside from a lawn mower so that makes sense.

1.1V is a lot closer to what you should be seeing at idle.

Here is the idle portion of the HPX transfer function.. As you can see, a very small voltage change will show a very small change in flow.

2.9" I.D. Tube
Volts Flow Kg/HR

0.88 6.07583
0.89615686 6.682653
0.91231373 7.306136
0.92847059 7.947277
0.94462745 8.607071
0.96078431 9.286515
0.97694118 9.986604
0.99309804 10.70833
1.0092549 11.4527
1.0254118 12.22069
1.0415686 13.01331
1.0577255 13.83155
1.0738824 14.6764
1.0900392 15.54886
1.1061961 16.44991
1.1223529 17.38057
1.1385098 18.34181
1.1546667 19.33463
1.1708235 20.36004
1.1869804 21.41901
1.2031373 22.51254
1.2192941 23.64164
1.235451 24.80729
1.2516078 26.01049
1.2677647 27.25223
1.283921 28.53351
1.3000784 29.85532
1.3162353 31.21866
1.3323922 32.62452
1.348549 34.07391
1.3647059 35.56781

It sounds to me like some people might be using the wrong transfer function from the start, or some modified version and making up differences elsewhere in the tune.

It is impossible for the maf sensor to not show an increase in voltage with an increase in airflow.

Just because RPM's are going up does not mean airflow is still increasing. Too small of a turbo or supercharger will cause boost to fall off and give you maf results like that every time. It's actually very common.

Last edited by Massairdirect; 01-04-2012 at 08:11 AM.
Old 01-04-2012, 08:00 AM
  #43  
Massairdirect
Registered User
 
Massairdirect's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by djamps
Not only that, but it seems every PMAS has different transfer functions down low so by replacing it you have to rework some of the tune. I was able to 'tune around' the idle stuff for the most part but it's still nothing like stock.
As every intake system, mounting flange, maf placement, tube diameter, albow angle, is also different. The voltage differences are just more pronounced at lower voltages.

I assure you the maf transfer function is the same. But the amount of air going across the sensor might be slightly different.

Last edited by Massairdirect; 01-04-2012 at 08:03 AM.
Old 01-04-2012, 10:59 AM
  #44  
Vince@R/TTuning
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (7)
 
Vince@R/TTuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Lansdale, PA
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

^^^^ u cant change the load points in the Nissan ECU's. You can change the value at each load point but the load point itself (I.E. voltage value) is not adjustable.
Old 01-04-2012, 11:01 AM
  #45  
Vince@R/TTuning
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (7)
 
Vince@R/TTuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Lansdale, PA
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

let me just say that I have had good results with PMAS MAF sensors. But when you have a stock sensor that is good up to about 400whp and then another sensor good to about 1000hp obliviously the resolution has to be affected, with that said it is expected and comes with the territory....
Old 01-04-2012, 02:31 PM
  #46  
350z006
New Member
iTrader: (79)
 
350z006's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 1,468
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

I'm not a tuner by any means nor do I know enough about tuning to really get into it with you guys, but I have had my car tuned with the PMAS sensor...

While my tuner has been successful tuning my car with the PMAS, there was a time when my PMAS MAF failed and I purchased a new PMAS, and at least at idle the car had to be re-tuned with the new MAF because it just wouldn't idle properly with the original tune from original PMAS MAF...the setup itself didn't change...thoughts?

Originally Posted by Massairdirect
As every intake system, mounting flange, maf placement, tube diameter, albow angle, is also different. The voltage differences are just more pronounced at lower voltages.

I assure you the maf transfer function is the same. But the amount of air going across the sensor might be slightly different.
Old 01-05-2012, 05:01 AM
  #47  
Massairdirect
Registered User
 
Massairdirect's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

it was probably an early sensor when they were still trying to find the perfect idle portion of the curve
Originally Posted by 350z006
I'm not a tuner by any means nor do I know enough about tuning to really get into it with you guys, but I have had my car tuned with the PMAS sensor...

While my tuner has been successful tuning my car with the PMAS, there was a time when my PMAS MAF failed and I purchased a new PMAS, and at least at idle the car had to be re-tuned with the new MAF because it just wouldn't idle properly with the original tune from original PMAS MAF...the setup itself didn't change...thoughts?
Old 01-05-2012, 05:44 AM
  #48  
djamps
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
djamps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: MD
Posts: 4,492
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Massairdirect
As I said, you can have more resolution down low by using more data points in the lower half of the curve. The voltage with the car not running is unreliable, the sensor needs air moving across it to start reading.
As vince already mentioned you cannot change the number or placement of voltage data points in Osiris it's kind of pointless argument. The data might 'be there' at very high resolution but the ECU will never be able to make use.]

That said I don't have any major issues with my PMAS. Gets the job done and handles a silly amount of flow with only slightly impacted idle a/f stability.

Last edited by djamps; 01-05-2012 at 05:46 AM.
Old 01-05-2012, 07:49 AM
  #49  
Massairdirect
Registered User
 
Massairdirect's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by djamps
As vince already mentioned you cannot change the number or placement of voltage data points in Osiris it's kind of pointless argument. The data might 'be there' at very high resolution but the ECU will never be able to make use.]

That said I don't have any major issues with my PMAS. Gets the job done and handles a silly amount of flow with only slightly impacted idle a/f stability.

Well that is unfortunate that Osiris won't unlock that part of the code. It would be very easy for PMAS to modify the curve on the sensor to change the idle voltage.

If anyone has some input on what range they would like to see I can get some changes made.
Old 01-05-2012, 07:16 PM
  #50  
nathanwl2004
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
nathanwl2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: charlotte ,nc
Posts: 738
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have no real experience with the pmax our any data logs of my car, but im running the GT MAF and it idles pretty damn close to stock. So much so that i would venture to guess most people wouldn't know the car is nearly as modded as it is if they didnt already know..
Old 01-05-2012, 11:42 PM
  #51  
Ngo
Registered User
 
Ngo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Rowland Heights, CA
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

thanks for the link to the PMAS transfer function. anyone have the transfer function for the Uprev GT Maf?
Old 01-06-2012, 04:09 AM
  #52  
nathanwl2004
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
nathanwl2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: charlotte ,nc
Posts: 738
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Come to think of it that would explain why uprev also sells another MAF thats supposed to support higher flow levels but degrade idle slightly. It may be more similar to the old pmas sensor.
Old 01-06-2012, 06:25 AM
  #53  
djamps
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
djamps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: MD
Posts: 4,492
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Massairdirect
Well that is unfortunate that Osiris won't unlock that part of the code. It would be very easy for PMAS to modify the curve on the sensor to change the idle voltage.

If anyone has some input on what range they would like to see I can get some changes made.
The best thing to do is emulate stock flow transfer function as close as possible <1.5V or so. Not sure if it's even possible without creating an issue elsewhere, but it would sure be nice.

Last edited by djamps; 01-06-2012 at 06:26 AM.
Old 01-06-2012, 06:36 AM
  #54  
Massairdirect
Registered User
 
Massairdirect's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by djamps
The best thing to do is emulate stock flow transfer function as close as possible <1.5V or so. Not sure if it's even possible without creating an issue elsewhere, but it would sure be nice.
It's actually not that hard. Anyone interested in a group buy if I can get it done? lol
Old 01-06-2012, 06:40 AM
  #55  
djamps
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
djamps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: MD
Posts: 4,492
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Honestly if you could really make this happen (+ consistency between each maf), probably rename it as well due to the HPX history, you'd have a leg up over the GT maf (more flow + perfect idle trims) and it would likely fly off the shelf.

Last edited by djamps; 01-06-2012 at 06:42 AM.
Old 01-06-2012, 05:53 PM
  #56  
Massairdirect
Registered User
 
Massairdirect's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by djamps
Honestly if you could really make this happen (+ consistency between each maf), probably rename it as well due to the HPX history, you'd have a leg up over the GT maf (more flow + perfect idle trims) and it would likely fly off the shelf.
Get me some maf voltage datalogs at idle if you can
Old 01-06-2012, 06:55 PM
  #57  
djamps
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
djamps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: MD
Posts: 4,492
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Massairdirect
Get me some maf voltage datalogs at idle if you can
It would be best put a stock MAF on a flow bench, as we know Osiris doesn't have the same voltage resolution compared to the logs you posted, so the logs might not be useful.
Old 01-09-2012, 07:11 AM
  #58  
Massairdirect
Registered User
 
Massairdirect's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by djamps
It would be best put a stock MAF on a flow bench, as we know Osiris doesn't have the same voltage resolution compared to the logs you posted, so the logs might not be useful.
I already have that data, I need to know what airflow VQ30 and 35's idle at.
Old 01-09-2012, 09:33 AM
  #59  
Vince@R/TTuning
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (7)
 
Vince@R/TTuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Lansdale, PA
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

^^^Not to be a dick but.... Why don't you source a 350z/g35 and then do the datalogs yourself as you are the company that would be profiting from them. As well as making sure you have the correct data to make a superior product.
Old 01-09-2012, 09:43 AM
  #60  
djamps
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
djamps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: MD
Posts: 4,492
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

I would help but I don't have access to a reflashed G/Z with stock MAF.


Quick Reply: Stock MAF vs Uprev GT MAF



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:50 AM.