Stock MAF vs Uprev GT MAF
#41
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
I'm not sure what people are talking about in reguards to resolution. The A.D.C. in the pcm is always the same. The HPX sensor will show changes as small as 2 KG/HR from .1v to 5V.
If you are looking for more resolution in the pcm you simply need to use more maf data points at the lower end of the maf range and less at the top.
Resolution has nothing to do with the actual MAF output. It has everything to do with the data points you chose to enter into the PCM.
Hopefully this helps
If you are looking for more resolution in the pcm you simply need to use more maf data points at the lower end of the maf range and less at the top.
Resolution has nothing to do with the actual MAF output. It has everything to do with the data points you chose to enter into the PCM.
Hopefully this helps
Last edited by djamps; 01-03-2012 at 05:24 PM.
#42
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well I got my PMAS about a year ago (right about when they became practically unavailable) and it has crap resolution at idle. In fact with engine off it still shows about 0.7 volts and voltage slowly drops at WOT gear after gear at the 1/4 track. you can see the voltage actually go backwards in the logs as RPMs increase on a hard pull. Not only that, but it seems every PMAS has different transfer functions down low so by replacing it you have to rework some of the tune. I was able to 'tune around' the idle stuff for the most part but it's still nothing like stock.
.7V is only about 4 KG/HR, way below anything seen entering any engine aside from a lawn mower so that makes sense.
1.1V is a lot closer to what you should be seeing at idle.
Here is the idle portion of the HPX transfer function.. As you can see, a very small voltage change will show a very small change in flow.
2.9" I.D. Tube
Volts Flow Kg/HR
0.88 6.07583
0.89615686 6.682653
0.91231373 7.306136
0.92847059 7.947277
0.94462745 8.607071
0.96078431 9.286515
0.97694118 9.986604
0.99309804 10.70833
1.0092549 11.4527
1.0254118 12.22069
1.0415686 13.01331
1.0577255 13.83155
1.0738824 14.6764
1.0900392 15.54886
1.1061961 16.44991
1.1223529 17.38057
1.1385098 18.34181
1.1546667 19.33463
1.1708235 20.36004
1.1869804 21.41901
1.2031373 22.51254
1.2192941 23.64164
1.235451 24.80729
1.2516078 26.01049
1.2677647 27.25223
1.283921 28.53351
1.3000784 29.85532
1.3162353 31.21866
1.3323922 32.62452
1.348549 34.07391
1.3647059 35.56781
It sounds to me like some people might be using the wrong transfer function from the start, or some modified version and making up differences elsewhere in the tune.
It is impossible for the maf sensor to not show an increase in voltage with an increase in airflow.
Just because RPM's are going up does not mean airflow is still increasing. Too small of a turbo or supercharger will cause boost to fall off and give you maf results like that every time. It's actually very common.
Last edited by Massairdirect; 01-04-2012 at 08:11 AM.
#43
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I assure you the maf transfer function is the same. But the amount of air going across the sensor might be slightly different.
Last edited by Massairdirect; 01-04-2012 at 08:03 AM.
#45
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (7)
let me just say that I have had good results with PMAS MAF sensors. But when you have a stock sensor that is good up to about 400whp and then another sensor good to about 1000hp obliviously the resolution has to be affected, with that said it is expected and comes with the territory....
#46
New Member
iTrader: (79)
I'm not a tuner by any means nor do I know enough about tuning to really get into it with you guys, but I have had my car tuned with the PMAS sensor...
While my tuner has been successful tuning my car with the PMAS, there was a time when my PMAS MAF failed and I purchased a new PMAS, and at least at idle the car had to be re-tuned with the new MAF because it just wouldn't idle properly with the original tune from original PMAS MAF...the setup itself didn't change...thoughts?
While my tuner has been successful tuning my car with the PMAS, there was a time when my PMAS MAF failed and I purchased a new PMAS, and at least at idle the car had to be re-tuned with the new MAF because it just wouldn't idle properly with the original tune from original PMAS MAF...the setup itself didn't change...thoughts?
As every intake system, mounting flange, maf placement, tube diameter, albow angle, is also different. The voltage differences are just more pronounced at lower voltages.
I assure you the maf transfer function is the same. But the amount of air going across the sensor might be slightly different.
I assure you the maf transfer function is the same. But the amount of air going across the sensor might be slightly different.
#47
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
it was probably an early sensor when they were still trying to find the perfect idle portion of the curve
I'm not a tuner by any means nor do I know enough about tuning to really get into it with you guys, but I have had my car tuned with the PMAS sensor...
While my tuner has been successful tuning my car with the PMAS, there was a time when my PMAS MAF failed and I purchased a new PMAS, and at least at idle the car had to be re-tuned with the new MAF because it just wouldn't idle properly with the original tune from original PMAS MAF...the setup itself didn't change...thoughts?
While my tuner has been successful tuning my car with the PMAS, there was a time when my PMAS MAF failed and I purchased a new PMAS, and at least at idle the car had to be re-tuned with the new MAF because it just wouldn't idle properly with the original tune from original PMAS MAF...the setup itself didn't change...thoughts?
#48
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
That said I don't have any major issues with my PMAS. Gets the job done and handles a silly amount of flow with only slightly impacted idle a/f stability.
Last edited by djamps; 01-05-2012 at 05:46 AM.
#49
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As vince already mentioned you cannot change the number or placement of voltage data points in Osiris it's kind of pointless argument. The data might 'be there' at very high resolution but the ECU will never be able to make use.]
That said I don't have any major issues with my PMAS. Gets the job done and handles a silly amount of flow with only slightly impacted idle a/f stability.
That said I don't have any major issues with my PMAS. Gets the job done and handles a silly amount of flow with only slightly impacted idle a/f stability.
Well that is unfortunate that Osiris won't unlock that part of the code. It would be very easy for PMAS to modify the curve on the sensor to change the idle voltage.
If anyone has some input on what range they would like to see I can get some changes made.
#54
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's actually not that hard. Anyone interested in a group buy if I can get it done? lol
#55
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Honestly if you could really make this happen (+ consistency between each maf), probably rename it as well due to the HPX history, you'd have a leg up over the GT maf (more flow + perfect idle trims) and it would likely fly off the shelf.
Last edited by djamps; 01-06-2012 at 06:42 AM.
#56
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Get me some maf voltage datalogs at idle if you can
#58
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts