Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

6266 vs 6466 vs 6766

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-11-2016, 06:43 AM
  #21  
Highway Riding
New Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Highway Riding's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Out on the Highway!
Posts: 5,543
Received 95 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cux350z
did he ever post a dyno graph?
Good question actually. I just always remember the signature mentioning 600+ with a 6266
Old 07-11-2016, 07:44 AM
  #22  
thatv35guy
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
thatv35guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 723
Received 59 Likes on 47 Posts
Default

If I recall correctly his car made mid 500's on pump gas and 600's on C16... I just don't think a 6266 will give you that much more headroom than a GT35R on this kit.
Old 07-18-2016, 11:26 AM
  #23  
2one8
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
2one8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: MN
Posts: 142
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by james12345pt
I have a powerlab kit with gt35r and have not been able to get past 525 on pump. Air flow through the hotside of the turbo is the limiting factor. I could reach my goal with e85 but it will cost me 2/3 the amount that a new turbo and tune would so rather have a new turbo and stay with 93 octane. I could sell the used turbo and recoup some of the cost of the upgrade and not have the added expense of having to used e85.
Im having the same problem, however I can not get over 500 on 93, 515 on 110 mix. I will hit 20psi until about 4700rpm then lose 4-5psi. I've got the .82 housing though. We have been fighting it for a few months, decided to probably go with the 6266 this winter and try again next season.
Old 07-18-2016, 11:34 AM
  #24  
2one8
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
2one8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: MN
Posts: 142
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by james12345pt
PS: My local tuner has a Dyno Dynamics dyno so it does read lower than a Dynojet. How much I do not know.
My tuner uses a DD dyno and has a Dynojet in the back, and he has stated that with a rwd car the difference between the two is marginal.
Old 07-18-2016, 12:29 PM
  #25  
thatv35guy
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
thatv35guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 723
Received 59 Likes on 47 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2one8
Im having the same problem, however I can not get over 500 on 93, 515 on 110 mix. I will hit 20psi until about 4700rpm then lose 4-5psi. I've got the .82 housing though. We have been fighting it for a few months, decided to probably go with the 6266 this winter and try again next season.
The 1.06 exhaust housing on the GT35R gave me almost 50whp more than the .82 housing on pump gas for what it's worth.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Justin100
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z
145
04-19-2020 06:58 PM
Unicus
Exterior & Interior
3
01-22-2017 06:05 PM
Jmfeld02
Lighting
3
08-09-2016 10:13 AM
Pleask
Maintenance & Repair
3
07-06-2016 12:19 AM



Quick Reply: 6266 vs 6466 vs 6766



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:41 AM.