Nissan 350Z Discussion forums, Photo Gallery and more...

Go Back   MY350Z.COM Forums > 350Z Tech Area > Engine & Drivetrain > Intake Exhaust
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into My350Z.com, click logo to login  
MyG37.com | G35Driver.com | My350Z.com | ZDriver.com



Welcome to my350z.com!

Welcome to my350z.com.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-01-2009, 04:02 PM   #1
4drmadness
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Orange County
Posts: 149
iTrader: (2)
Default Motordyne 5/16 vs Blox 5/8 Spacer before,after dyno runs

Hey guys, i did some before and after runs between the two different spacers. These two dynos were done one after the other so the variables didnot change. I did 3 pulls with the blox 5/8 spacer, and then 3 pulls with the motordyne 5/16 spacer. I changed the spacers while my car was on the dyno so that the results would be as accurate as possible.
The motordyne spacer gained more torque and Hp at all rpm ranges. In the midrange, around 4k, the MD spacer gained about 8lbs of torque over the blox spacer, and around 5000 rpm, the md spacer gained around 9 hp.
I was really amazed to see that the md spacer had better gains in the higher rpm as well. Blox was supposed to be most beneficial in the higher rpms, but the md beat the blox in that area as well.
I gained around 2hp, and 4lbs of torque in terms of peak power.
Overall this was well worth doing a before and after dyno. The midrange power is definetly felt by my butt and dynapack dyno. This was my before/ after dyno, which was performed at Church Automotive, Socal.
I have a 04 g35 sedan. Pics of dyno are attached as well. these are pics taken by my iphone so they are not that clear. i will scan it tommorow, and have better pics tommorow. guys if you pick anyhting out that i didnot mention, please let me know. thanks.

The blue line is a dyno with the blox, and the green/red is with the md spacer on.
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg dyno.jpeg (16.5 KB, 280 views)
File Type: jpeg dyno2.jpeg (14.0 KB, 254 views)
4drmadness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2009, 05:31 PM   #2
davidv
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 32,787
iTrader: (0)
Default

Thanks for the tests. Many of us are aware that bigger (thicker) is not necessarily better.
__________________
350Z 2004 Enthusiast: K&N Typhoon Air Intake - Motordyne Plenum Spacer - Alphawerks Stainless Steel Headers - Helix SS Test Pipes - Injen Super SES Cat-Back Exhaust System - 6 Pad Puck Ceramic Clutch and Forged Steel Flywheel by Competition Clutch - WedsSport SA-70
davidv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2009, 05:57 PM   #3
Nexx
350Z-holic
 
Nexx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: DFW
Posts: 11,352
iTrader: (35)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by davidv View Post
Thanks for the tests. Many of us are aware that bigger (thicker) is not necessarily better.
but that's not what she said?
__________________
Greddy, HKS, Volk, Haltech, Motordyne....
Nexx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2009, 07:55 PM   #4
fatlace_ak21
Registered User
 
fatlace_ak21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kelowna, BC
Posts: 370
iTrader: (5)
Default

^^^ Haha you beat me to it.
__________________
04 Chromesilver Base Z33|WORK|JIC|HKS|NISMO|08 Honda Element EX
fatlace_ak21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2009, 09:39 PM   #5
2004Black350z
Im that Guy
 
2004Black350z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NC
Posts: 3,981
iTrader: (18)
Default

list of mods?
__________________
Exhaust Whore
2004Black350z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2009, 10:11 PM   #6
4drmadness
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Orange County
Posts: 149
iTrader: (2)
Default

stillen gen2, engine damper, kinetix cats, dc headers, jwt popcharger, ztube, md spacer, ur crank pulley
4drmadness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2009, 11:21 PM   #7
2004Black350z
Im that Guy
 
2004Black350z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NC
Posts: 3,981
iTrader: (18)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4drmadness View Post
stillen gen2, engine damper, kinetix cats, dc headers, jwt popcharger, ztube, md spacer, ur crank pulley
hmm 270hp out of that not bad
__________________
Exhaust Whore
2004Black350z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2009, 02:44 AM   #8
Ziggyrama
Registered User
 
Ziggyrama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Northboro, MA
Posts: 667
iTrader: (9)
Default

Anyone care to explain why this is the case? Is it related to different intake resonance when 5/16 spacer is used vs. 5/8? You'd think the larger spacer would provide better flow although this dyno suggests otherwise.
__________________
CORRUPTION - I want either less of it or more opportunity to participate in it. Redline 2003 350Z Base, TXS catback, sways, DIY plenum spacer, P&P TB, G35 Rays, decisive driver
Ziggyrama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2009, 07:50 AM   #9
Hydrazine
MOTORDYNE-MY350Z SPONSOR
 
Hydrazine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: L.A. California
Posts: 3,718
iTrader: (33)
Default

You got it Ziggyrama.

It can only be due to resonance. In 2004 when Motordyne was doing R&D on spacer size Vs HP, a range of spacer sizes were tested. Everything from 1/8", 1/4", 3/8", 1/2" and 3/4".
5/16" was eventually settled upon as having the best overall results.

What was interesting to see from the testing is that not only the 5/16" had a better overall response than 1/2" spacer, the 3/4" spacer lost power everywhere compared to the 1/2" spacer.

Not only 3/4" was larger than optimum for power, it would contact the hood when installed on a 350Z.

There are only two plastic spacer manufacturers that use a 5/8" tall spacer. My guess is they simply developed the biggest spacer they could possibly fit under the hood of a 350Z before putting it into production.

This same resonance effect was also demonstrated in the Nissan Sport Magazine comparison.
__________________
Motordyne Engineering - Winner of the Nissan Sport Magazine Plenum Mod Shootout!
http://motordyneengineering.com/dynos.htm
A VQ Heritage with over 10,000 installations of Quality, Reliability and Performance

Last edited by Hydrazine; 02-04-2009 at 11:09 AM.
Hydrazine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2009, 08:41 AM   #10
terrasmak
Registered User
2003 Nissan 350Z
 
terrasmak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sin City
Posts: 5,974
iTrader: (3)
Default

I wonder how the difference in spacer size would effect an FI engine. Tony , have you played with that side of the house ?
__________________
Sure therapy, but screaming obscenities is cheaper.
terrasmak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2009, 08:48 AM   #11
sry110
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Phoenixville, PA
Posts: 2,993
iTrader: (8)
Default

I'm curious if any better performance could have been achieved with a non-nominal thickness, i.e. something that is not a regular inch size. I am thinking maybe 9 mm (between 5/16 and 3/8). But even if there was an improvement, it's probably just not economical because the fractional inch sizes are probably the readily available off the shelf material, and therefore more cost effective.

Anyway, I'm still really happy with my 5/16 spacer + MREV2.
__________________
2006 Magnetic Black 350Z Enthusiast 6MT / Various paychecks and bonuses
sry110 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2009, 09:43 AM   #12
Hydrazine
MOTORDYNE-MY350Z SPONSOR
 
Hydrazine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: L.A. California
Posts: 3,718
iTrader: (33)
Default

EDIT: Interesting read here.
http://my350z.com/forum/intake-exhau...k2-spacer.html
__________________
Motordyne Engineering - Winner of the Nissan Sport Magazine Plenum Mod Shootout!
http://motordyneengineering.com/dynos.htm
A VQ Heritage with over 10,000 installations of Quality, Reliability and Performance

Last edited by Hydrazine; 03-16-2009 at 08:36 AM.
Hydrazine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2009, 11:11 AM   #13
kenpo_350Z
Registered User
 
kenpo_350Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Garden City, KS.
Posts: 1,162
iTrader: (13)
Default

Great thread, I still promote my MD 5/16 spacer to any Z owners I come into contact with. Its not only a difference you can really feel, but they also have excellent customer service.
__________________
2004 Silverstone Touring ZR 6 Spd, burnt orange/black vented seats, JDM Clear Reflectors, S2K Antenna, RS*R Exmag GTII, Motordyne 5/16 Iso Thermal Spacer, JWT Popcharger, Unorthodox Racing Underdrive Crank Pulley, 30% Tint, tail light overlays, Hawk HPS pads, Kenwood DNX 7100 NAV/DVD, Seibon VS2 Carbon Hood.
kenpo_350Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2009, 08:16 PM   #14
4drmadness
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Orange County
Posts: 149
iTrader: (2)
Default

Yup, after this dyno i have no second thoughts of recommending people to get MD spacers
4drmadness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2009, 09:00 PM   #15
T_K
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 554
iTrader: (1)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ziggyrama View Post
Anyone care to explain why this is the case? Is it related to different intake resonance when 5/16 spacer is used vs. 5/8? You'd think the larger spacer would provide better flow although this dyno suggests otherwise.
I'd imagine the OEM manifold is resonance tuned, albeit with a slight shortcoming as far as flow distribution to the front-most cylinders. The smaller spacer possibly helps correct the flow distribution problem, without significantly altering the OEM resonance tuning.

TK
T_K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2009, 11:55 AM   #16
ADMAN
Registered User
 
ADMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: SIN CITY
Posts: 1,471
iTrader: (8)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by terrasmak View Post
I wonder how the difference in spacer size would effect an FI engine. Tony , have you played with that side of the house ?


ADMAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2009, 12:49 PM   #17
Hydrazine
MOTORDYNE-MY350Z SPONSOR
 
Hydrazine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: L.A. California
Posts: 3,718
iTrader: (33)
Default

I haven't dynod it myself so I don't have any plots to show. There are many people using them with FI but very few post dynos of it. They are very rare.

This is one FI reference.
19.6 HP with forced induction
http://my350z.com/forum/forced-induc...-19-46whp.html

There was one other that I can remember posted a while back by RandysG. He had a Vortec and made approximately 17 HP.
__________________
Motordyne Engineering - Winner of the Nissan Sport Magazine Plenum Mod Shootout!
http://motordyneengineering.com/dynos.htm
A VQ Heritage with over 10,000 installations of Quality, Reliability and Performance

Last edited by Hydrazine; 03-19-2009 at 12:51 PM.
Hydrazine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2009, 02:03 PM   #18
Motormouth
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: .
Posts: 18,891
iTrader: (44)
Default

most of the time the spacers are just 'part of the build' and not individually tested on the engine it seems. only big dollar components seem to be singled out by the FI crowd... the SSV got the treatment as did the Cosworth.

fwiw, I have the 1/2 inch spacer edit: MOTORDYNE of course
__________________
There is nothing wrong with our healthcare system in the USA. We have the best healthcare and research foundations in the world. - Simann
Motormouth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2009, 02:29 PM   #19
Changvi
Registered User
 
Changvi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 4,220
iTrader: (66)
Default

I had just recently tossed my Kinetix v+ full plenum for MD 5/16th spacer. Even thought the kinetix sounded meaner and louder during start up, the power difference was very apparent. From my butt dyno, the car had a much better torque response from the MD spacer than the Kinetix v+ plenum. Less lag, and much stronger pull. I'm glad i made the switch, and i would highly recommend teh 5/16th spacer to all of the Z owners....

Last edited by Changvi; 03-19-2009 at 02:32 PM.
Changvi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 02:01 PM   #20
norapat01
Registered User
 
norapat01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 1,977
iTrader: (16)
Send a message via MSN to norapat01
Default

I install MD 5/16 spacer and waited about 2 weeks to do a dyno. I ended up losing about 6 lb/ft of torque and 1-2 hp

Anyone have any clue why does this happened? Is it necessary to reset the ecu (disconnect the battery for 24 hrs)?
__________________
Friends don't let friends mod RX-8's...
norapat01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
350z, 38, 516, blox, dyno, exhaust, g35, kn, motordyne, mrev2, plenum, pulleys, spacer, thermal, typhoon



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:34 AM.

Advertise on MY350Z.COM - MY350Z.COM - Archive - Top

Advertise on MY350Z.COM - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - Jobs
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright ©2002 - 2008, MY350Z.COM All Rights Reserved.