Custom 3" Intakes on VQ35HR project....
#284
Registered User
What do you guys think?
#285
Sounds like your tuner has no idea what he is doing. Did you do a pull right before you had the intakes installed on the same day? If not, then you have no way to determine how much you actually lost/gained. That's why I did my before pull, installed intakes, 1 hour later, did next pull with intakes and retune.
#286
Registered User
Sounds like your tuner has no idea what he is doing. Did you do a pull right before you had the intakes installed on the same day? If not, then you have no way to determine how much you actually lost/gained. That's why I did my before pull, installed intakes, 1 hour later, did next pull with intakes and retune.
My tuner is actually pretty good. He tuned a de 350z to 318 whp with high comp and e85 on his mustang dyno. My hr previously made 295...He tuned it and power dropped to around 280. No we did not get a chance to do a base that day. Temp was actually a bit colder that day. Car does not feel as strong as it did on the 295 map.
#287
My tuner is actually pretty good. He tuned a de 350z to 318 whp with high comp and e85 on his mustang dyno. My hr previously made 295...He tuned it and power dropped to around 280. No we did not get a chance to do a base that day. Temp was actually a bit colder that day. Car does not feel as strong as it did on the 295 map.
the most important thing was having a before dyno done on the same day right before the intakes and you didn't lol
#288
Registered User
then you can't know how much you lost or gained. the power could have been relocated UTC. several diff things could have happened. and you won't really be able to "feel" a ~5% whp difference. i know some people claim their "butt dyno" feels a gain, but in reality you can not feel such a small percent change in hp.
the most important thing was having a before dyno done on the same day right before the intakes and you didn't lol
the most important thing was having a before dyno done on the same day right before the intakes and you didn't lol
lol yea I would understand if the difference was maybe 5 hp or so but not 15-20 on a mustang dyno....especially when the temp is the same or a bit colder..Yesterday I did a free run on a dyno jet that i did my baseline on..i was previously over 300 on that dyno and now I made 272 in 4th gear.
#289
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Sounds like your tuner has no idea what he is doing. Did you do a pull right before you had the intakes installed on the same day? If not, then you have no way to determine how much you actually lost/gained. That's why I did my before pull, installed intakes, 1 hour later, did next pull with intakes and retune.
then you can't know how much you lost or gained. the power could have been relocated UTC. several diff things could have happened. and you won't really be able to "feel" a ~5% whp difference. i know some people claim their "butt dyno" feels a gain, but in reality you can not feel such a small percent change in hp.
the most important thing was having a before dyno done on the same day right before the intakes and you didn't lol
the most important thing was having a before dyno done on the same day right before the intakes and you didn't lol
lol yea I would understand if the difference was maybe 5 hp or so but not 15-20 on a mustang dyno....especially when the temp is the same or a bit colder..Yesterday I did a free run on a dyno jet that i did my baseline on..i was previously over 300 on that dyno and now I made 272 in 4th gear.
After ruling out the tune, (timing maps were good, there was nothing more to be gained from modifying the timing curve), I took a look at the intake installation. At least one of the angled reducers on there is stretched on the outside, resulting in a potential binding/pinching on the inside. With horsepower starting to fall off around 6,800 RPM I think those angled reducers are causing a restriction, either that or the filters.
I'm going to try and setup an appointment to have the car dyno'd with stiffer reducers and no filters at some point and report back my results.
Chad, we will talk more about this and I can cover you on the costs of testing going forward.
Pictures are below for more information, sorry for the poor quality on the dyno sheet.
Last edited by Moncef; 02-09-2015 at 05:47 AM.
#290
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Miami
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm thinking it's cause you went from the injen longtubes and the other guy went with the short ram stillen with the heat shield.
lol yea I would understand if the difference was maybe 5 hp or so but not 15-20 on a mustang dyno....especially when the temp is the same or a bit colder..Yesterday I did a free run on a dyno jet that i did my baseline on..i was previously over 300 on that dyno and now I made 272 in 4th gear.
#294
Registered User
3 inch intakes will be taken off in 2 weeks. Will be posted up for sale. These are good but just not as good as my CAI injen set up. Great for someone who is scared to hydrolock.
#295
Hardest Setting
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: MexiCali dodging potholes
Posts: 13,406
Received 130 Likes
on
102 Posts
3" Longtubes lol...I'm no scientist
I'm still clearing out my garage and soaking up some needed family time but here in the next week or so I'll be continuing my NA quest !
In for more
I'm still clearing out my garage and soaking up some needed family time but here in the next week or so I'll be continuing my NA quest !
In for more
#296
Registered User
#298
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
but could you elaborate more on this?
also Moncef did you sort out what was wrong with the assassin's setup and why he lost power?
the whole 3 inch intake thing intrigued me if it gained more power than injen cold air intakes and were easier to clean the filters while also having virtually no chance of hydrolocking.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
350Z_Al
Exterior & Interior
133
10-29-2020 07:44 PM
ars88
Zs & Gs For Sale
18
04-04-2016 07:52 AM