Nissan 350Z Discussion forums, Photo Gallery and more...

Go Back   MY350Z.COM Forums > General > The Lounge (Off Topic) > Sports > MMA & Boxing

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-05-2008, 09:58 AM   #1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 264
iTrader: (2)
ABC - New rules, Weight classes, thoughts...

Taken from Sherdog.com:

------------------------------------------------
MONTREAL -- A revised edition of the Unified Rules of Mixed Martial Arts were passed Thursday by the Association of Boxing Commissions via a majority vote at the ABC's annual conference.

The amended document -- drafted by the ABC's MMA Chairman Dale Kliparchuk, New Jersey State Athletic Control Board Deputy Attorney Nick Lembo, ABC President Timothy Leuckenhoff and veteran referee "Big" John McCarthy -- primarily provided clarifications to the already existing Unified Rules instituted in April 2001 that serve as a regulatory beacon for the sport throughout North America.

Within the revised regulations, verbiage was added to further define what constitutes an illegal strike to the back of a competitor's head. The revised rules now distinguish the back of the head as the "crown of the head down the centerline of the skill into the spine, with a 1 inch variance to each side." This is commonly referred to as the "Mohawk" definition.

Proponents supporting the ear-to-ear definition spoke of the need to preserve fighter safety, particularly in dealing with the tender area along the spine.

McCarthy, who presented the revisions to ABC members with Kliparchuk and Lembo, told the group that the "Mohawk" definition had always been the intended interpretation of the rule since its 2001 inception and had never been the cause of serious injury during the sport's tenure. McCarthy urged that altering the definition to include the entire back area would alter the mechanics of the sport.

McCarthy described the scenario in which one fighter can take another's back, but would no longer be able to punch his opponent from that position.

"If you start doing things to try and make boxing fit within MMA, you start to allow the rules to control a position so the fighter can actually go to that position because they realize they can not be attacked there. The opponent who had dominance over me now doesn't have the ability to do much to me," said McCarthy.

In addition, verbiage prohibiting elbow strikes in the downward "12-to-6 o'clock" motion was stricken, as the original rule's intention was to prohibit the technique to the restricted spinal cord area, not ban the actual movement itself. Elbow strikes of all kinds are now permissible, except to illegal areas.

Smothering the mouth or nose of an opponent has been added to the Unified Rules' fouls list, prohibiting a fighter from using his hand to prevent his opponent's ability to breathe. According to the new verbiage, this does not include choke attempts where a fighter's mouth is covered by his opponent's arm.

Fouls constituting unsportsmanlike conduct were consolidated together in the revised document, while the recovery period allowed to a fouled fighter was clarified in the new text. A fighter who has been struck with a low blow will have up to five minutes to recover. All other fouls will be assessed by a physician, who will make a determination within five minutes if the fighter is fit to continue.

A proposed amendment allowing knees to the head of a downed opponent did not make it into the revised regulations for a vote. ABC President Leuckenhoff said the technique had been discussed in the weeks prior to the conference, but it was decided the move would be too radical for some legislatures still considering the sport at this time.

The fourteen weight classes include: flyweight (up to 105 lbs), super flyweight (over 105.1 to 115 lbs), bantamweight (over 115.1 to 125 lbs), super bantamweight (over 125.1 to 135 lbs), featherweight (over 135.1 to 145 lbs), lightweight (over 145.1 to 155 lbs), super lightweight (over 155.1 to 165 lbs), welterweight (over 165.1 to 175 lbs), super welterweight (over 175.1 to 185 lbs), middleweight (over 185.1 to 195 lbs), super middleweight (over 195.1 to 205 lbs), light heavyweight (over 205.1 to 225 lbs), heavyweight (over 225.1 to 265 lbs), and super heavyweight (over 265.1 lbs).
------------------------------------------------

(More at site)

Thoughts?

Big John rocks. While I think the weight class change is maybe a year or two too early (in terms of MMA popularity), I'm assuming it will probably take another year or two before all the commissions get it passed in their respective states and all the orgs should have adjusted by then.

And thank god for the back of the head rule clarification. I always thought the ear-to-ear definition allowed someone to 'turtle' too effectively and avoid punishment from backmount.
Mikey-Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 10:43 PM   #2
Registered User
 
stu46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 4,121
iTrader: (0)
Does NSAC, CSAC and UFC need to comply with the ABC's rules?
stu46 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2008, 04:46 AM   #3
Registered User
 
skooly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Down South
Posts: 4,890
iTrader: (0)
Way too many new weight classes.
__________________
Down by law.
skooly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2008, 08:18 AM   #4
Bad Mojo
 
GodZilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 2,536
iTrader: (0)
Would make it easier to fight in 2 different classes
__________________
kyle
GodZilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2008, 11:38 AM   #5
Registered User
 
Highway Riding's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: North NJ
Posts: 921
iTrader: (1)
total BS. this is what killed boxing..
__________________
The Sun Rises In The EAST!
Highway Riding is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2008, 07:48 PM   #6
Bad Mojo
 
GodZilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 2,536
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Highway Riding
total BS. this is what killed boxing..
You think?
__________________
kyle
GodZilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2008, 07:52 PM   #7
thunshine booty
 
turismo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: curl lookin boy
Posts: 7,671
iTrader: (25)
Quote:
Originally Posted by skooly
Way too many new weight classes.
true
__________________
Greddy TT, Built Autobahn Longlbock, Vpro, 20in Gold GT30's, Stance GR Pro Coilovers, Stoptech 355f/r etc.......
turismo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2008, 11:23 PM   #8
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 525
iTrader: (2)
the question is. whos rules are these?? each boxing commission is free to make whatever rules they want. for us here in alberta. this is what allows one fight club down south to allow knees to the head, to a grounded opponent. because they have their own boxing commision down there. but everyone else north of them, abides by the no knees to the head rule.
__________________
2003 Nissan 350Z, Black Performance Edition- HKS Hi-Power exhaust, Berks HFC's, Motordyne 5/16 plenum spacer, Volk SF-Challenge, Cusco LSD
Someguy350 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2008, 02:07 PM   #9
Registered User
 
zdrift78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ontario,ca
Posts: 320
iTrader: (0)
it's up to the athletic commissions in each state as well as the promoters whether or not they choose to accept and implement the ABC's rules, etc. that being said, i would say the elbow rule and the back of the head rule are the only additions that seem logical. implementing that many weight classes is just plain stupid.

oh and btw they also call for making smothering of the mouth and nose illegal, which i agree with.
zdrift78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2008, 08:22 PM   #10
Hater
 
Fluid1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The End of The Line
Posts: 10,824
iTrader: (17)
Quote:
Originally Posted by stu46
Does NSAC, CSAC and UFC need to comply with the ABC's rules?
Nay.
__________________
Originally Posted by MC: if shamrock KO's kimbo i'll tap dance on the hood of my GTR in high heels.
Fluid1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2008, 08:24 PM   #11
Registered User
 
stu46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 4,121
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fluid1
Nay.
didn't think so. i don't see the big deal
stu46 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2008, 11:14 AM   #12
Registered User
 
Highway Riding's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: North NJ
Posts: 921
iTrader: (1)
Quote:
Originally Posted by GodZilla
You think?
Yes sir when u have 15 different weight classes it maks it hard to keep track of who is champion..
__________________
The Sun Rises In The EAST!
Highway Riding is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2008, 07:43 PM   #13
Registered User
 
stu46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 4,121
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Highway Riding
Yes sir when u have 15 different weight classes it maks it hard to keep track of who is champion..
can't keep track of 15 fighters? how can you accomplish anything at work or pass any test in school?
stu46 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2008, 08:15 PM   #14
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 264
iTrader: (2)
I don't mind the weight classes though. While i think "Super Middleweight" isn't needed (186-205 is fine), the lighter weight classes could use it. Guys like Sakurai, Gomi, Diego Sanchez - they're pretty big for 155 and a bit undersized against the larger 170-175ers like GSP, Fitch, Alves, etc.

It's a bit early for it though. The 'established' talent pool isn't enough to fill all the weight classes just yet. I'm sure in about 2-3 years it will be, and it makes sense at the rate the sport is going.
Mikey-Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2008, 08:16 PM   #15
Registered User
 
stu46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 4,121
iTrader: (0)
at the lighter weights, more divisions are needed since a slight advantage in weight is a huge difference.
stu46 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2008, 08:20 PM   #16
Hater
 
Fluid1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The End of The Line
Posts: 10,824
iTrader: (17)
I agree. Going from 135 to 145, that 10 pounds is a higher percentage of overall weight than the 10 pounds between 225 and 235.
__________________
Originally Posted by MC: if shamrock KO's kimbo i'll tap dance on the hood of my GTR in high heels.
Fluid1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2008, 08:25 PM   #17
Registered User
 
stu46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 4,121
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fluid1
I agree. Going from 135 to 145, that 10 pounds is a higher percentage of overall weight than the 10 pounds between 225 and 235.
you're setting a trend. you can't start agreeing with my post.
someone needs to disagree, and that person is you.

eta: noobs don't count.

Last edited by stu46; 07-09-2008 at 08:28 PM.
stu46 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 07:19 AM   #18
Registered User
 
350zex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: memphis
Posts: 196
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by stu46
Does NSAC, CSAC and UFC need to comply with the ABC's rules?
no and from what I've heard all those ac's already said they didn't like the rules
350zex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 08:04 AM   #19
Hater
 
Fluid1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The End of The Line
Posts: 10,824
iTrader: (17)
Quote:
Originally Posted by stu46
you're setting a trend. you can't start agreeing with my post.
someone needs to disagree, and that person is you.

eta: noobs don't count.


Okay, I can play foil.

I think that there should be NO weight classes, that each fight that is contracted should be individually classed, and that each class has a 2 pound spread that both fighters have to make.

For example:

Anderson Silva vs. James Irvin could be a 201-202 pound spread.
Matt Hughes vs. Tiago Alves could have been 174-175

__________________
Originally Posted by MC: if shamrock KO's kimbo i'll tap dance on the hood of my GTR in high heels.
Fluid1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2008, 06:05 PM   #20
Super Moderator
MY350Z.COM
 
USN HM 350Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: San Diego 92119
Posts: 19,162
iTrader: (108)
I still think fighters should have to weigh in 2 hours before the fight. That would keep people fighting closer to their natural weight.

would have people dropping 40 pounds before a fight, only to rehydrate and carb up the day before to gain 20 or so pounds of it back.
__________________


-2008.5 Nissan Titan SE
*CST 4" spindle lift/Bilstein Shocks/JBA Exhaust/Volant Intake/HyperTech Beta Test Unit/N-Fab Steps/HID Lights Headlights & Driving lights/ BullBar with KC High Lights
-2006 Mazda Miata MX-5
*Bilstein shocks/ Eibach springs
-1975 S30 Right Hand Drive Fairlady Z(Project Car)
*SR20DETT swap coming soon
-2004 Nissan 350Z JWT TT (Gone, but not forgotten)
USN HM 350Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:12 PM.


Advertise on MY350Z.COM - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - Jobs


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright ©2002 - 2008, MY350Z.COM All Rights Reserved.