Notices
Motorsports The Z in its Natural Habitat

19s...Slowing you down?

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-22-2003, 12:36 PM
  #1  
VQ35DES
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
VQ35DES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation 19s...Slowing you down?

Ive been seeing a trend with people running crappy times (high 14s low 15s) that are using 19s (bad for launches). But I think it might be the weight more than the size.

Anyone with 19s please post your wheel specs (type, weight, etc..) along with your time slips.
VQ35DES is offline  
Old 08-22-2003, 02:14 PM
  #2  
patdsaunders
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
patdsaunders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Albuquerque NM
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It is more than just the weight. Up to 50% of the power to accelerate a car (and brake it) goes into spinning up the wheels. So it is not the static weight, but the rotational inertia. For racers, we should choose the brakes required for a track, after maximum ducting is applied, and then put on the smallest wheel that will fit over them. It is more complicated than this with tire choices, usually race tires come in odd sizes of 13", 15" and 17", and handeling issues need to be accounted for, but it is a good starting guidline. 19" wheels could take as much as 25% more power to spin them up than 17". That could be 10% of your engines power. I have not run the numbers on this system, but when I went from 15" to 13" on my RX-7, I droped the rotational inertia of the car, including engine and drivetrain, by about 60%. This lead to head snapping accereration from a 170hp car. I use 17" wheels with race tires, 275/40, since 16" wheels and tires are limited. Some autocrossers are using 16s.
patdsaunders is offline  
Old 08-22-2003, 10:50 PM
  #3  
rodH
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
rodH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: coto de caza, ca
Posts: 3,319
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

my 19s were 8 pounds (total) lighter than stock
rodH is offline  
Old 08-23-2003, 06:30 AM
  #4  
patdsaunders
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
patdsaunders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Albuquerque NM
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The stock wheels are garbage, except for the Rays track. And again, it is the mass distribution, not the weight. I'm watching Formula 3000 and they are using 13".
patdsaunders is offline  
Old 08-23-2003, 08:47 AM
  #5  
rodH
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
rodH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: coto de caza, ca
Posts: 3,319
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally posted by patdsaunders
The stock wheels are garbage, except for the Rays track. And again, it is the mass distribution, not the weight. I'm watching Formula 3000 and they are using 13".
good point on teh mass distibution, although if a wheel/tire combo were a few pounds lighter, I would doubt that it would be that much heavier on the perimeter (where it matters) to make that much of a difference.

BUT it is a good point, and EXACTLY why I spent a few hundred more on Toyos than Bridgestones (they are 3-6 pounds lighter per tire)

as an avid mountain biker I know that rotational wt (mass) is very important
rodH is offline  
Old 08-23-2003, 11:02 PM
  #6  
VQ35DES
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
VQ35DES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Guess this is going to put me off from getting 19" volk GTCs...would have been nice.

No one with quarter mile times (with 19s)?
VQ35DES is offline  
Old 08-24-2003, 07:27 PM
  #7  
Wicked4u2c
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Wicked4u2c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: La Mirada
Posts: 1,212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by VQ35DES
Guess this is going to put me off from getting 19" volk GTCs...would have been nice.

No one with quarter mile times (with 19s)?
I have 1/4 mile time slips.. My times stayed the same but here is the catch...

Stock which I was consistent

I ran 14.3 @100mph with a (2.3-2.4 60 foot)

With Volk GT-7 and Big Brake Kit

I ran 14.3 @98mph with a (2.1-2.2 60 foot)

What I am saying is with the 19" I got better traction and the car launches nice but with stock tires I was spinning them so you can see the difference in the MPH.
Wicked4u2c is offline  
Old 08-24-2003, 07:33 PM
  #8  
myinfinitig20
Registered User
 
myinfinitig20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pasadena/ Dana Point
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

most sport cars come wtih 18s stock....19s is something new and its usually purely for sport
myinfinitig20 is offline  
Old 08-25-2003, 07:16 AM
  #9  
Traffic
Registered User
 
Traffic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,310
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally posted by VQ35DES
Guess this is going to put me off from getting 19" volk GTCs...would have been nice.

No one with quarter mile times (with 19s)?
I wouldn't let this put you off from getting the Volks. If you're that serious about dragging your car, then put on the stock 17s with race rubber for when you go to the track. Better still, get a set of CE28Ns in 17" and then put a set of sticky tires on.
Traffic is offline  
Old 08-27-2003, 06:11 PM
  #10  
little_rod
New Member
 
little_rod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: In my car, Arkansas
Posts: 1,114
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Guys, 2003z already did a real good comparison of this using dyno numbers. Interesting results, although it is not on the strip.

https://my350z.com/forum/showthread....&highlight=19s
little_rod is offline  
Old 08-28-2003, 06:14 AM
  #11  
silverTA 2002
Registered User
 
silverTA 2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Taller wheels, with lower profile tires are worse for traction. That's a fact.

19's are actually worse than 18's or 17's for handling as well.

Rule of thumb- low sidewall flex is great for handling, but terrible for acceleration

Lots of sidewall flex is great for accleration, terrible for handling.

There's a reason that drag cars use 15" wheels, with huge tires that flex like mad.
silverTA 2002 is offline  
Old 08-28-2003, 09:47 AM
  #12  
little_rod
New Member
 
little_rod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: In my car, Arkansas
Posts: 1,114
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by silverTA 2002
Taller wheels, with lower profile tires are worse for traction. That's a fact.

19's are actually worse than 18's or 17's for handling as well.

Rule of thumb- low sidewall flex is great for handling, but terrible for acceleration

Lots of sidewall flex is great for accleration, terrible for handling.

There's a reason that drag cars use 15" wheels, with huge tires that flex like mad.
Dude, that middle part contridictes (sp?) everything else in your post. I do agree with you, the 19s are better for handling cause of less sidewall flex, and the 17s are better at the strip.
little_rod is offline  
Old 09-06-2003, 05:46 PM
  #13  
VQ35DES
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
VQ35DES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sorry, but what do you mean by side wall flex?
VQ35DES is offline  
Old 09-06-2003, 06:29 PM
  #14  
little_rod
New Member
 
little_rod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: In my car, Arkansas
Posts: 1,114
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

VQ35DES, the lower the profile the side of the tire has, the less sidewall the tire has that can flex one way or another. Now this is relative to the similar tire constructions and such, cause some tires are just better than others. But when you have a 35 series on a 19" rim, you have less sidewall than a 50 series on a 17" rim. When you corner, the G forces put a lot of pressure on the tires, and they have a tendency to lay down on their side under this pressure.
little_rod is offline  
Old 09-06-2003, 07:25 PM
  #15  
350z4steve
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
350z4steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: so cal
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

19's look better but the numbers dont lie your better off with 17' or 18' due to alot of reason not just weight or rotational mass but more selection or tires and if you go through alot of rubber it will save you in the long run. Not to mention slightly quicker in acceleration..if you want to better looks get the 19's or 20's. Like someone posted above this is a new trend hence limited selection in tire sizes and choices 19".

I acually thought toyos were good but i have heard alot of negative comments about them ..def not good at the track with the soft sidewalls. Anyone have good experience with toyos on the track?
350z4steve is offline  
Old 09-12-2003, 12:55 PM
  #16  
jckolnturn
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
jckolnturn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Elongated Island
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Can anyone in real world terms tell me how much of a difference 18 vs 19's will make? For argument sake we keep everything the same just change the height of the rim and the tires to keep the same tire height. I like the nismo wheels and the look of the new 19's but I like them in the 18" size too. I don't want to loose performance to get a 'look.'
jckolnturn is offline  
Old 09-12-2003, 04:19 PM
  #17  
2003z
New Member
iTrader: (7)
 
2003z's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 4,959
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I believe zoasis did back to back runs with track rays? (maybe standard 18s) and iforged 19s. He lost .2 seconds.

My best is a 14.490 on my iforged. That was with injen cai and technosquare ecu being only performance mods, and about 85% and very humid. My biggest problem seemed to be traction, as I got a lot of wheelspin.

Going back on the 19th with Borla dual and M/T ET Street, 26x10.50 on light 16" wheels. Hopefully should do a lot better!
2003z is offline  
Old 09-18-2003, 02:28 PM
  #18  
tooleman
Registered User
 
tooleman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: san jose
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default oh

when go from a bigger rim from a 18 to 19 you are messing up your gearing which will slow you down..
tooleman is offline  
Old 09-18-2003, 04:07 PM
  #19  
2003z
New Member
iTrader: (7)
 
2003z's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 4,959
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: oh

Originally posted by tooleman
when go from a bigger rim from a 18 to 19 you are messing up your gearing which will slow you down..
not if the outer diameter of your new tire is the same. going from a 245/45-18 to a 275/35-19 will have no gearing change.
2003z is offline  
Old 09-18-2003, 05:04 PM
  #20  
tooleman
Registered User
 
tooleman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: san jose
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default no

thats not always true.. I went from a 245 17 45 to a 275 17 40 and my tire got taller and wider..
tooleman is offline  



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:08 AM.