Miscellaneous Photography Thread
#163
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by yobri
Some people say that the 17-40mm is a bit slow, but I honestly can tell the difference. Need more lenses in order to be able to compare better, I guess
I would have gotten the 24-70mm over the 17-40mm if I was in a better financial position b/c of the reviews (in favor of the 24-70mm) that I have read and gotten from a couple of photog boards.
I would have gotten the 24-70mm over the 17-40mm if I was in a better financial position b/c of the reviews (in favor of the 24-70mm) that I have read and gotten from a couple of photog boards.
http://www.tamron.co.jp/en/news/rele...s0215_a16.html
I'll probably sell my 28-75 for the 17-50 once it's released.
#164
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GTNPU Z
Hey Jim,
I pretty much just started myself & got the XT. The only thing I feel that some folks may not like is the size. For me I think it's fine but for others, they may think it's a bit small/cramped for a DSLR especially if you plan on using larger telephoto lenses. You can add the battery grip to increase the size in those situations for better handling but it still may feel cramped if you have big fingers/hands.
For the price of what you get though, it handles like a champ. I love mine.
Good luck!
I pretty much just started myself & got the XT. The only thing I feel that some folks may not like is the size. For me I think it's fine but for others, they may think it's a bit small/cramped for a DSLR especially if you plan on using larger telephoto lenses. You can add the battery grip to increase the size in those situations for better handling but it still may feel cramped if you have big fingers/hands.
For the price of what you get though, it handles like a champ. I love mine.
Good luck!
I'm the little Asian guy.
#165
VERTEX Army CEO
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 7,408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, for me I want something fairly versitile. I will be using it both indoors & outdoors as well as low light & bright light. I will most likely be using it more for outdoors though both during the bright light & low light settings (sunset, parking lot, etc...).
#166
350Z-holic
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: teh interwebnets
Posts: 17,685
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by gr?
When you say that the 17-40 is 'slow' are you referring to the autofocus or the aperture speed? f/4.0 isn't bad but it of course f/2.8 is better (1 full stop). Personally, I would never buy a wide angle zoom lens with f/4.0. You don't realize how much difference 1 full stop makes until you start shooting indoors under poor lighting. The 17-40 f/4.0L is a great lens but for what I look for in a lens, I went with the Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 since it was a faster lens. Plus, at $330 after MIR, it's a hell of a bargain. If you plan on shooting indoors or under less - than - sunny lighting, you might want to think about spending the extra on the 24-70 f/2.8L or getting the Tamron 28-75 f/2.8..... or waiting fo the Tamron 17-50 f/2.8 that is due to hit the shelves on the US market any day now.
http://www.tamron.co.jp/en/news/rele...s0215_a16.html
I'll probably sell my 28-75 for the 17-50 once it's released.
http://www.tamron.co.jp/en/news/rele...s0215_a16.html
I'll probably sell my 28-75 for the 17-50 once it's released.
#167
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by JimRHIT
Hey Guys .... I am about 2 steps away from joining the club here
I've got my eyes set on
1) Canon 350D
2) Nikon D50
With either camera, I will be starting out with the Sigma 30/1.4
Now .... looking and researching and thinking ... I'd eventually want a telephoto lens, something like a 100/2 or an 85/1.8 or so ... and it appears that Canon is easier to get lenses for. Knowing me and my "hobbies", I'll get carried away with this and won't be happy ending up "waiting" for a Nikon mount lens to be released. So .. I have about 99% convinced myself to head in the Canon direction ....
can anyone say anything bad about the D-Reb? A friend uses one and loves it, and I have no real experience, other than playing around in the stores with a Nikon ...
Price ... it's a $50 wash either way ... so the better camera will get the nod from me.
Input is much appreciated
Thanks guys,
Jim
I've got my eyes set on
1) Canon 350D
2) Nikon D50
With either camera, I will be starting out with the Sigma 30/1.4
Now .... looking and researching and thinking ... I'd eventually want a telephoto lens, something like a 100/2 or an 85/1.8 or so ... and it appears that Canon is easier to get lenses for. Knowing me and my "hobbies", I'll get carried away with this and won't be happy ending up "waiting" for a Nikon mount lens to be released. So .. I have about 99% convinced myself to head in the Canon direction ....
can anyone say anything bad about the D-Reb? A friend uses one and loves it, and I have no real experience, other than playing around in the stores with a Nikon ...
Price ... it's a $50 wash either way ... so the better camera will get the nod from me.
Input is much appreciated
Thanks guys,
Jim
Depending on what you shoot might make a difference in what you want to buy. If you plan on doing wildlife, action/sports, or any photography where you 'll want the extra reach, the Canon telephoto lenses have a big advantage over the Nikon. But, if you do landscape or something that requires super wide angles, the Nikon selection is better.
I went with a Canon body due to the Canon lenses. It's hard to beat the autofocus speed, sharpness, and color of an L lens. If you ever get a 1D series body, the weather sealing is a huge advantage if you in dusty conditions or in the rain.
#168
350Z-holic
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: teh interwebnets
Posts: 17,685
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by gr?
Once you hold and use a 10D/20D/30D or the 1D series, you'll probably end up selling your 350D. I picked up a 10D as a back up body to put on the Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS so that I wouldn't have to switch lenses all the time but the 10D became my primary body and I use the 350D with the telephoto lens. The body is way too small to hold comfortably, even with a battery grip. Here's a shot my friend took this last weekend that shows the 350D being miniature in size when used in conjunction with a telephoto lens.
http://www.hostmypiconline.com/images/carlisle001xx.jpg
I'm the little Asian guy.
http://www.hostmypiconline.com/images/carlisle001xx.jpg
I'm the little Asian guy.
#169
VERTEX Army CEO
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 7,408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by yobri
Whoa, the 70-200mm lens makes the 350D look so unbalanced...
#170
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by yobri
I meant AP... I would have to shoot with a better lens f-stop in order to realize what I'm missing (the difference in how I'm taking shots versus how a better stop would look with the same shots)... but my indoor shots could stand do better (plus an aftermarket flash is also on my shopping list). I still take average pictures at this point in my experience...
I'm probably an oddball but when I go to car shows or other events, I rarely travel lightly. I bring everything since I'm willing to carry 18 lbs of gear to make sure I get good pics. My back hates me by the end of the day but it's worth it when the pictures come out worthwhile.
#171
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GTNPU Z
Well, for me I want something fairly versitile. I will be using it both indoors & outdoors as well as low light & bright light. I will most likely be using it more for outdoors though both during the bright light & low light settings (sunset, parking lot, etc...).
Several times I week I see people on fredmiranda.com selling the 300mm f/4.0 and upgrading to a 300mm f/2.8 just because they don't like the background blur from the 4.0.
#172
VERTEX Army CEO
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 7,408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by gr?
If you don't want to mess with an external flash and/or a tripod, the f/2.8 (or faster lens) would be an advantage.
#174
Seems like this has become a place to ask questions about digital SLR's, and NOT a gallery as the title states. Let's see some more pics!!!!
If you want to ask questions...start another thread.
If you want to ask questions...start another thread.
#175
VERTEX Army CEO
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 7,408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by rx7twinturboboy
Seems like this has become a place to ask questions about digital SLR's, and NOT a gallery as the title states. Let's see some more pics!!!!
If you want to ask questions...start another thread.
If you want to ask questions...start another thread.
Originally Posted by GTNPU Z
So with that said, I have created this thread for all DSLR owners (Canon, Nikon, etc...) to share their pics on whatever subject matter it may be (cars, portraits, nature, landscape, buildings, etc...)(no **** of course ). I think it'll be real cool to see people's work since I've seen some awesome photo skills up in this forum. It'll also be a good area for others to learn how to take those great pictures as well.
I can easily change the title if needs be
But I agree though...we need more pics!
Last edited by GTNPU Z; 05-11-2006 at 03:33 PM.
#176
VERTEX Army CEO
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 7,408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Anyways, here's a few from a photoshoot I took of GQ350Z:
More here on pages 4 & 5.
https://my350z.com/forum/media-share/189384-updated-gq-spring-collection-2006-he-s-back-ya-ll.html
More here on pages 4 & 5.
https://my350z.com/forum/media-share/189384-updated-gq-spring-collection-2006-he-s-back-ya-ll.html
Last edited by GTNPU Z; 05-11-2006 at 03:47 PM.
#177
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GTNPU Z
Hmm? Well I think this bit of info is more up my alley of what I'm looking for.
To keep rx7twinturboboy happy, here's a pic
#178
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GTNPU Z
Yeah, tell me about it. I can only imagine the amount of stress the area has between the camera body & the lens.
Side shot to show how small the 350D is
Last edited by gr?; 05-12-2006 at 04:10 AM.
#179
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GTNPU Z
Anyways, here's a few from a photoshoot I took of GQ350Z:
More here on pages 4 & 5.
https://my350z.com/forum/showthread.php?t=189384
More here on pages 4 & 5.
https://my350z.com/forum/showthread.php?t=189384
#180
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 4,801
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GTNPU Z
Okay, here are my front runners before I pull the trigger:
Canon EF 17-40mm f/4 L = Approx. $700
Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L = Approx. $1200
Which one would you choose & why? Obviously the 17-40mm is the more affordable one but if you had to line these up side-by-side, which one will provide you with the best overall performance & picture quality? TIA.
Canon EF 17-40mm f/4 L = Approx. $700
Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L = Approx. $1200
Which one would you choose & why? Obviously the 17-40mm is the more affordable one but if you had to line these up side-by-side, which one will provide you with the best overall performance & picture quality? TIA.
I've got the 50 f/1.8 if you wanna try it out. I don't have much time for photography the next few weeks.