Nissan 350Z Discussion forums, Photo Gallery and more...


Go Back   MY350Z.COM Forums > General > The Lounge (Off Topic) > Politics, War, Religion, & Race
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?
MyG37.com | G35Driver.com | My350Z.com | ZDriver.com





Welcome to my350z.com!
Welcome to my350z.com.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!



Reply
 
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-29-2009, 02:50 PM   #1
mikecamp
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Gray house with blue shutters
Posts: 1,035
iTrader: (0)
Default "Shameful"

I have to agree with President Obama on this. I saw the footage when he said this and thought it was great. He's dead on when wondering why these CEOs just don't "get it" that this looks bad and ticks off taxpayers. You'd thinks they'd be smarter than this.

Quote:
President Barack Obama said bonuses dealt out by Wall Street firms are “shameful” while the U.S. economy is in recession and companies are asking for help from taxpayers.
Bloomberg article
__________________
Good goobly goo -Grady
mikecamp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2009, 03:01 PM   #2
coreapoc
Registered User
 
coreapoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mount Pleasant,SC
Posts: 1,976
iTrader: (0)
Send a message via AIM to coreapoc
Default

Yep. I watched that live as well. The entire time it looked like he just wanted to say "Come on America use come fcking common sense"
__________________
I come from a 2jz world. Regardless of the argument, a stock Z is slow as balls.
coreapoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2009, 03:47 PM   #3
IIQuickSilverII
Chief Engineer
 
IIQuickSilverII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Arizona -InP-
Posts: 13,130
iTrader: (13)
Points: 5,339, Level: 46
Points: 5,339, Level: 46 Points: 5,339, Level: 46 Points: 5,339, Level: 46
Today's Activity: 2.1%
Today's Activity: 2.1% Today's Activity: 2.1% Today's Activity: 2.1%
Send a message via AIM to IIQuickSilverII Send a message via MSN to IIQuickSilverII
Default

heavily related to article by the OP



Cuomo Targets Thain


“It was pretty clear from TARP I that the secretary of the Treasury was supposed to establish a provision for executive clawback,” Hamermesh said in a phone interview. “How the secretary has implemented that isn’t clear.”

The Treasury could require companies that request additional funds to repay excessive bonuses as a condition of the further financing, Hamermesh said.

“If they come around to ask again, they could say we’re going to deny it unless they cough up the bonuses,” he said.

New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo said on Jan. 27 that he subpoenaed former Merrill Lynch Chief Executive Officer John Thain for information about bonuses Merrill paid just before its acquisition by Bank of America. Thain said that he had kept the Charlotte, North Carolina-based bank informed about the brokerage’s finances and compensation.

Treasury agreed this month to provide $20 billion in capital and $118 billion in asset guarantees to Bank of America to help it absorb losses at New York-based Merrill.


more info on this guy Thain
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...d=a15OKR1CDvgc
__________________
my Z33

(forum protocol)
- Motormouth: Serious thread gets serious reply. Troll thread gets troll reply
IIQuickSilverII is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2009, 10:09 PM   #4
matthew122
Registered User
 
matthew122's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 129
iTrader: (0)
Points: 5,584, Level: 48
Points: 5,584, Level: 48 Points: 5,584, Level: 48 Points: 5,584, Level: 48
Today's Activity: 0%
Today's Activity: 0% Today's Activity: 0% Today's Activity: 0%
Default

The American people voted these "we know what's best for the economy" politicians into office, enabling the irresponsible gift of billions of OUR DOLLARS to these failing companies.

Personally, I'm glad they took their bonuses. I wish they would have used every bit of these governmental bailouts on bonuses. Maybe then people will wake up and realize how dumb it is for us to let the politicians handle our economy.

This isn't the first, and definitely won't be the last misuse of billions of taxpayer funds.
__________________
2007 MB Touring, Burnt Orange interior, Turbo XS exhaust, FP shift knob w/ burnt orange boot
matthew122 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 02:16 AM   #5
mikecamp
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Gray house with blue shutters
Posts: 1,035
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by matthew122 View Post
The American people voted these "we know what's best for the economy" politicians into office, enabling the irresponsible gift of billions of OUR DOLLARS to these failing companies.

Personally, I'm glad they took their bonuses. I wish they would have used every bit of these governmental bailouts on bonuses. Maybe then people will wake up and realize how dumb it is for us to let the politicians handle our economy.

This isn't the first, and definitely won't be the last misuse of billions of taxpayer funds.
There were plenty voters irritated by the bailout money and how our representatives in DC voted. These bonuses only added to that irritation. Saying you are happy seems disingenuous to me. Seriously, why would you be happy? The reasons you gave? I don't think so. You should be irritated like many of us and likely are, in all honesty.
__________________
Good goobly goo -Grady
mikecamp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 05:42 AM   #6
Act of God
Registered User
 
Act of God's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 1,984
iTrader: (0)
Points: 3,151, Level: 34
Points: 3,151, Level: 34 Points: 3,151, Level: 34 Points: 3,151, Level: 34
Today's Activity: 0%
Today's Activity: 0% Today's Activity: 0% Today's Activity: 0%
Default

Those bonuses are taxed at nearly 50%, which goes right back to the government. I highly doubt they are that upset about it.
__________________
www.leftyguitartrader.com The ONLY place on the net for the left-handed guitarist!
Act of God is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 06:03 AM   #7
booger
Registered User
 
booger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: council bluffs Ia.
Posts: 9,892
iTrader: (6)
Points: 7,807, Level: 59
Points: 7,807, Level: 59 Points: 7,807, Level: 59 Points: 7,807, Level: 59
Today's Activity: 13.2%
Today's Activity: 13.2% Today's Activity: 13.2% Today's Activity: 13.2%
Default

Obama said they should be shameful ? Pleeeeeeeeease . He is calling the kettle black with that one . His stimulous package is full of waist and pork and he isnt shameful of it ? All of Washington is trying to sell us a London bridge and we do nothing about it .
Our Gov. is a joke and we are on a slop of no return .
__________________
And liberals are like dogs . They bark till everyone is annoyed.
booger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 06:08 AM   #8
Act of God
Registered User
 
Act of God's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 1,984
iTrader: (0)
Points: 3,151, Level: 34
Points: 3,151, Level: 34 Points: 3,151, Level: 34 Points: 3,151, Level: 34
Today's Activity: 0%
Today's Activity: 0% Today's Activity: 0% Today's Activity: 0%
Default

Another point, iirc a lot of the people on Wall Street don't have very high salaries. They make most of their money in bonuses. Kinda like waiters and waitresses.
__________________
www.leftyguitartrader.com The ONLY place on the net for the left-handed guitarist!
Act of God is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 06:09 AM   #9
coreapoc
Registered User
 
coreapoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mount Pleasant,SC
Posts: 1,976
iTrader: (0)
Send a message via AIM to coreapoc
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Act of God View Post
Another point, iirc a lot of the people on Wall Street don't have very high salaries. They make most of their money in bonuses. Kinda like waiters and waitresses.
averaged out it was still over 1.5 mil per person.
__________________
I come from a 2jz world. Regardless of the argument, a stock Z is slow as balls.
coreapoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 06:27 AM   #10
chico-gonzalez
Registered User
 
chico-gonzalez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: usa
Posts: 4,642
iTrader: (0)
Points: 6,569, Level: 53
Points: 6,569, Level: 53 Points: 6,569, Level: 53 Points: 6,569, Level: 53
Today's Activity: 1.6%
Today's Activity: 1.6% Today's Activity: 1.6% Today's Activity: 1.6%
Default

it absolutely IS shameful...
know what else is shameful? the senate/house voting themselves a pay raise with the current economic turmoil.


f*cking hypocrites all

chico (wonders when the fat lazy, entitled americans will get off their ass and grab some pitchforks)
__________________
History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme - Mark Twain
chico-gonzalez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 08:42 AM   #11
cheshirecat79
Registered User

 
cheshirecat79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Port St. Lucie, FL
Posts: 12,269
iTrader: (9)
cheshirecat79
Points: 5,144, Level: 45
Points: 5,144, Level: 45 Points: 5,144, Level: 45 Points: 5,144, Level: 45
Today's Activity: 33.5%
Today's Activity: 33.5% Today's Activity: 33.5% Today's Activity: 33.5%
Send a message via AIM to cheshirecat79 Send a message via Yahoo to cheshirecat79
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Act of God View Post
Those bonuses are taxed at nearly 50%, which goes right back to the government. I highly doubt they are that upset about it.
That is a great point.
cheshirecat79 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 04:22 PM   #12
Motormouth
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: not here
Posts: 21,339
iTrader: (44)
Default

I thought a lot of these bonuses came under the capital gains rate.

what would I know.
Motormouth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 06:40 PM   #13
matthew122
Registered User
 
matthew122's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 129
iTrader: (0)
Points: 5,584, Level: 48
Points: 5,584, Level: 48 Points: 5,584, Level: 48 Points: 5,584, Level: 48
Today's Activity: 0%
Today's Activity: 0% Today's Activity: 0% Today's Activity: 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikecamp View Post
There were plenty voters irritated by the bailout money and how our representatives in DC voted. These bonuses only added to that irritation. Saying you are happy seems disingenuous to me. Seriously, why would you be happy? The reasons you gave? I don't think so. You should be irritated like many of us and likely are, in all honesty.
Oh trust me, I'm extremely irritated, but not at a bonus paid to a wall street executive. First, it was the oil companies' profits... now it's executive bonuses. These people make so much money because their companies were highly successful. Stop hating on and penalizing success.

What kind of pay these executives receive is their business. If you don't like it, don't invest in these companies or buy their products. Seems pretty simple to me.

"You should be ashamed of yourself, how dare you be successful in America when people can't afford healthcare!"
__________________
2007 MB Touring, Burnt Orange interior, Turbo XS exhaust, FP shift knob w/ burnt orange boot
matthew122 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 07:29 PM   #14
IIQuickSilverII
Chief Engineer
 
IIQuickSilverII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Arizona -InP-
Posts: 13,130
iTrader: (13)
Points: 5,339, Level: 46
Points: 5,339, Level: 46 Points: 5,339, Level: 46 Points: 5,339, Level: 46
Today's Activity: 2.1%
Today's Activity: 2.1% Today's Activity: 2.1% Today's Activity: 2.1%
Send a message via AIM to IIQuickSilverII Send a message via MSN to IIQuickSilverII
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Motormouth View Post
I thought a lot of these bonuses came under the capital gains rate.

what would I know.
__________________
my Z33

(forum protocol)
- Motormouth: Serious thread gets serious reply. Troll thread gets troll reply
IIQuickSilverII is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 08:03 PM   #15
Motormouth
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: not here
Posts: 21,339
iTrader: (44)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by matthew122 View Post
Oh trust me, I'm extremely irritated, but not at a bonus paid to a wall street executive. First, it was the oil companies' profits... now it's executive bonuses. These people make so much money because their companies were highly successful. Stop hating on and penalizing success.

What kind of pay these executives receive is their business. If you don't like it, don't invest in these companies or buy their products. Seems pretty simple to me.

"You should be ashamed of yourself, how dare you be successful in America when people can't afford healthcare!"
you are really really ignorant of this issue. just. stop. omg.

Last edited by Motormouth; 01-30-2009 at 08:06 PM.
Motormouth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2009, 03:10 AM   #16
mikecamp
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Gray house with blue shutters
Posts: 1,035
iTrader: (0)
Default

^^ Matthew122, the argument is about the color of the money in question, not being anti-success.
__________________
Good goobly goo -Grady
mikecamp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2009, 09:08 AM   #17
kzshin
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: OC, CA.
Posts: 954
iTrader: (0)
Default

After all these, I rather they bail out companies like big three in Detroit, or companies that actaully provide job, produced products, own alot of factories, and actually doing something good for America. That's where the job are. Although, I was against bailing out GM, and Chyrsler at first (since they actually digged their own grave 15, 20 years ago), but I rather goverment help them out than wall street.

I dont understand why our goverment was very meticulous about giving money to traditional business like the big three, but so lose on financial firm.

I also think CEO or high executives in the company shouldn't get that much of money, and should be responsible when business went bad. Look at Toyota, when they dont make money, they canned the CEO. I also heard about some companies in Germany, if the companies doesnt make money, CEO dont get money.

When M.Benz acquired Chrysler a while back ago, CEO of M.Benz was suprised that CEO of of Chrysler made more money than he does. Espcially, during the time, Chrsler was losing money, and M.Benz was alot alot more profitable.
kzshin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2009, 01:13 PM   #18
Motormouth
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: not here
Posts: 21,339
iTrader: (44)
Default

because the people who control the money are from the financial industry for one, and second, business in america is dependant on financing. you take away credit and the market dies. so many retail businesses survived because of credit.
Motormouth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2009, 03:10 PM   #19
matthew122
Registered User
 
matthew122's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 129
iTrader: (0)
Points: 5,584, Level: 48
Points: 5,584, Level: 48 Points: 5,584, Level: 48 Points: 5,584, Level: 48
Today's Activity: 0%
Today's Activity: 0% Today's Activity: 0% Today's Activity: 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikecamp View Post
^^ Matthew122, the argument is about the color of the money in question, not being anti-success.
Ok, I get that. But the only way to stop people from taking advantage of bailout funds is to not give them any in the first place. Otherwise, what do you expect? If the government decided to "make it rain" billions on your company, there's bound to be some upper level management types who will pocket some.

Should you be outraged? Yeah sure, because it's probably your money that they're pocketing. In my opinion, this type of behavior should be expected though with an unaccountable, nontransparent bailout, and you shouldn't act so surprised about it happening.

If we want this type of behavior to stop, we should stop feeding it.

BTW, I'm just ranting so take it for what it's worth.
__________________
2007 MB Touring, Burnt Orange interior, Turbo XS exhaust, FP shift knob w/ burnt orange boot
matthew122 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2009, 03:16 PM   #20
matthew122
Registered User
 
matthew122's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 129
iTrader: (0)
Points: 5,584, Level: 48
Points: 5,584, Level: 48 Points: 5,584, Level: 48 Points: 5,584, Level: 48
Today's Activity: 0%
Today's Activity: 0% Today's Activity: 0% Today's Activity: 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Motormouth View Post
because the people who control the money are from the financial industry for one, and second, business in america is dependant on financing. you take away credit and the market dies. so many retail businesses survived because of credit.
Hence a bubble that needed correction, and it's now getting that correction (if it doesn't get bailed out first). There are too many malls as it is, level a few of 'em.
__________________
2007 MB Touring, Burnt Orange interior, Turbo XS exhaust, FP shift knob w/ burnt orange boot
matthew122 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2009, 03:16 PM
My350Z
350 Z




Paid Advertisement
 
 
 
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

ADVERTISING
INSURANCE CENTER

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:59 AM.

Advertise on MY350Z.COM - MY350Z.COM - Archive - Top

Advertise on MY350Z.COM - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - Jobs
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
Copyright ©2002 - 2008, MY350Z.COM All Rights Reserved.

Admin control Panel Backup