SSR Engineering Intake Manifold Complete! *Pics*
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SSR Engineering Intake Manifold Complete! *Pics*
Hey guys, the pricing and test results will be released in about a week, here are some pictures for now!
Here are some pics of test fitment
Here are some pics of test fitment
#2
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 1,814
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
WOW!!!
How's it sound?
How's it feel?
Any dyno?
I know you said a week, but surely you can give us SOME more info, or this will be a 1 week teaser.
Looks badass.
How's it sound?
How's it feel?
Any dyno?
I know you said a week, but surely you can give us SOME more info, or this will be a 1 week teaser.
Looks badass.
Last edited by Ricky; 03-25-2004 at 01:55 PM.
#4
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 1,814
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Also, can there be any problems now that whats under the manifold is exposed? I can see some wiring which doesn't have any thing protecting it, such as rubber hoses?
Trending Topics
#8
New Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 765
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is this designed for NA or TT? Also, will the strut bar have to be eliminated for this to work?
Its nice to see more products coming out, especially intake manifolds since up until about 2 months ago there was only one.
Looking forward to the dynos!
I think we can set the over/under at 1.5 days before representatives of a certain group come in here slinging ********
Its nice to see more products coming out, especially intake manifolds since up until about 2 months ago there was only one.
Looking forward to the dynos!
I think we can set the over/under at 1.5 days before representatives of a certain group come in here slinging ********
Last edited by jcr847; 03-25-2004 at 02:11 PM.
#10
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is the throttle body piping missing on the pics attached on the car? I can't see the bend where the throttle body would be sitting at. Looks good though, now get some hard dyno# on this new intake plenum.
#12
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by jcr847
Is this designed for NA or TT? Also, will the strut bar have to be eliminated for this to work?
Its nice to see more products coming out, especially manifolds since up until about 2 months ago there was only one.
Looking forward to the dynos!
Is this designed for NA or TT? Also, will the strut bar have to be eliminated for this to work?
Its nice to see more products coming out, especially manifolds since up until about 2 months ago there was only one.
Looking forward to the dynos!
As far as expected gains, it's really hard to say.
#13
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Man in the Sun
Posts: 2,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have voiced some concerns before about the problems with an aftermarket manifold.....especially with regards to the power brake system that is integrated into the factory lower plenum. Why do yo think Crawford did it the way they did? They tried it all.
I do give props for the design though...it would br great for F/I...if the brake issue has been addressed.
I do give props for the design though...it would br great for F/I...if the brake issue has been addressed.
#15
New Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 765
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by g356gear
I have voiced some concerns before about the problems with an aftermarket manifold.....especially with regards to the power brake system that is integrated into the factory lower plenum. Why do yo think Crawford did it the way they did? They tried it all.
I do give props for the design though...it would br great for F/I...if the brake issue has been addressed.
I have voiced some concerns before about the problems with an aftermarket manifold.....especially with regards to the power brake system that is integrated into the factory lower plenum. Why do yo think Crawford did it the way they did? They tried it all.
I do give props for the design though...it would br great for F/I...if the brake issue has been addressed.
People fail to realize that marketing is just that, marketing. Obviously anyone is going to generate reasons to explain why their design is superior. Is the crawford crew the end all zen master of the VQ35, hell no!! Is it possible someone could improve upon their design, hell the 1st person to the table after them did.
I'm not saying that this is necessarily better but I can think of no definitive reason why it couldn't be given the limited amount of information we have at this point.
How about, just once, we wait for more info before reverting to the half assed "I am a crawford lemming and they rule" ********.
#18
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Miami, Fl
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Looking good. Hey SSR dont mind these "nay-sayers". Looks like you guys produced a quality product and I'm sure the Z community will love to have some more options on thier plenum choices.
#19
New Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 765
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by PhoenixINX
Bye Bye Torque.
Bye Bye Torque.
I would like to apologize to SSR for the momentary hijack. I look forward to seeing the dynos for your manifold.