Originally Posted by Wolffe G Puppy

http://videos.streetfire.net/video/3...tside_4480.htm

This has always been of of my fave Z32 videos. This guy is hauling some serious a**!!!!!!!!!

Originally Posted by scotts300

10.1@136 is nice, but this is sweeter:

9.7 in vid, yet slip says 9.4 at 142:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=lNTEwM9jhNc

Originally Posted by j.arnaldo

Unless you're getting $$ for racing, it don't matter! WE ALL LOOK G-O-O-D IN
OUR Zeds! THAT'S the bottom line!!! I even cruise-control mine to 55MPH, to
save gas (squeezing 2 weeks out of a tank-ful!) Enjoy your rides & worry less
'bout lap times, dudes!!!

Originally Posted by dram

I have a 93tt 5spd and an 05 anniversary 6spd...

the tt is stock and I remember beating an 03 when they first came out - not off the line, but after the turbos spooled up in 2nd and 3rd.... we ran out of room- but I think that I would have pulled really hard in 4th and 5th with the turbo

300hp stock vs 287hp stock... and that's if the other car was a 6spd and not auto ( really suprised me that I could beat it... I think I suprised the driver of the newer car as well )

my 05 has nismo exhaust, nismo cai and 20 in wheels...( and whatever else the previous owner put under the hood- haven't really looked yet ) the 05 feels faster than the 93tt... the traction control really helps the tires hook up where as the tt will just spin when the turbos spool up

05 = 300hp + exhaust and intake = ? + traction control ( I haven't figured out if I like it or hate it when driving fast... have done launches both ways, sometimes it helps, sometimes it sucks... although I can get some nice drift when I turn it off and try to drive fast up a curvy on ramp )

93 = 300hp but with no traction control and some older BFG on 16 in rims
( very easily breaks traction )

cornering? I think my 05 will beat the 93 hands down- just feels lighter and tighter. ( I know it's not really lighter ) Much quicker and more precise when the road gets bumpy and twisty

straight line? seat of the pants feel? the 05- since I can't drive both cars at the same time, I'll never find out.

although compared to my cbr1000rr - both cars feel slow

Originally Posted by opathal

The 300ZxTT would beat up on an HR.

My friend bought a TT with 30K original miles. It pulls a LOT harder than my car. Though...it is slightly modded with another 7K in mods going on shortly.

Originally Posted by xtremefairladyz

That's what I'm talkin about!!!!

Originally Posted by 95rtturbo

True. An HR is quicker than a Z32TT stock for stock (as was said a gazillion times already in this thread).



That's why it feels a lot faster than your 350Z, slightly modded Z32TT's can equal easily over 300RWHP.

Originally Posted by DaytonaRoadster

Clarkston is a fu$kin tard, hes an entertaner(i guess anything will work in england) and doesnt know dick about cars. He hates it cause its an american design with a japanese motor (which he keeps saying is french, even though its 100% japanese and used in some french cars, cause nissan is part owner in renault i think), and he cant find any part of it made near brittan, like he imagines comes up with for everything else, so therefore its crap to him (if even one bolt came from brittan he'd say it was a British engineering marvel, like his ******** about Mitsubishi's 'british' engineers on the evo, what a fu$kn joke).
Hes like most british, doesnt want to make anything, but complains about what everyone else does. Him and those other to mousey fuc%s talk loads of $hit about american cars, yet hammond owns a mustang fastback and a dodge charger, clarkston owned a Escort Cosworth, and a Ford GT or two for a while. The thinks the corvette and viper are good cars (hes obviously never owned one, overpirced pieces of unrealiable trash). I know american cars suck, thats why i have a Fit and a Z, at least i pratice what i preach.

After all, im sure all sports cars are judged on their drag racing speed only, you know like the miata and S2K he loves so much, those things are drag superstars.
The show is fun to watch for the tests they do, but if you want acutal intellgent comments on a car, read car and driver, not the opinion of a fat yellow-toothed, poorly educated, arrgont, sexist, racist pig.

Originally Posted by opathal

The 300ZxTT would beat up on an HR.

Originally Posted by JSDZ33

you can spend 3 G's on a Z32TT and get well over 400 Crank HP.

Originally Posted by SOLO-350Z

True that, but tell ya what, run a 400hp-500 one on a track and it will still be left behind. I loved it when I passed many Z32s TT, modded ones at MotorSport Ranch in 2006 at the convention in dallas with my G35 sedan with some suspension work.

Originally Posted by JSDZ33

you are a better driver. i owned a Z32 and a Z33, the handling difference wasnt much in favor of the Z33, and a heavy *** G sedan?!?!?!?!? doubt ANY of those guys knew how to drive. give me a Z32 with 400 HP and you can have your "sedan" with suspension mods and i'll destroy you on any track...

Originally Posted by JSDZ33

you are a better driver. i owned a Z32 and a Z33, the handling difference wasnt much in favor of the Z33, and a heavy *** G sedan?!?!?!?!? doubt ANY of those guys knew how to drive. give me a Z32 with 400 HP and you can have your "sedan" with suspension mods and i'll destroy you on any track...

Originally Posted by SOLO-350Z

True that, but tell ya what, run a 400hp-500 one on a track and it will still be left behind. I loved it when I passed many Z32s TT, modded ones at MotorSport Ranch in 2006 at the convention in dallas with my G35 sedan with some suspension work.

Originally Posted by Motormouth

not if your suspension was stock you wouldnt.

but also, why did no one look up the stock drag times for a 300zx? that is the easiest way. i thought they were almost the same, like rated at within a tenth or two.