MY350Z.COM - Nissan 350Z and 370Z Forum Discussion

MY350Z.COM - Nissan 350Z and 370Z Forum Discussion (https://my350z.com/forum/)
-   2003-2009 Nissan 350Z (https://my350z.com/forum/2003-2009-nissan-350z-2/)
-   -   VQ35 - Third best engine in 3L - 4L class... (https://my350z.com/forum/2003-2009-nissan-350z/78369-vq35-third-best-engine-in-3l-4l-class.html)

elyliu 06-09-2004 01:00 PM

VQ35 - Third best engine in 3L - 4L class...
 
Link to article...

Number one is M3...
Number two is Porsche Turbo

So I dont feel too bad.

VQ35 did beat out the engine in Ferrari 360 tho :)....

04_CS_Z33 06-09-2004 01:35 PM

Neat, the VQ beat some pretty high end engines.

91na 06-09-2004 01:38 PM

Nice!

I wish I had an M3...

teh215 06-09-2004 01:42 PM

It seems that BMW has always won that class according to thier site. Not that it doesn't deserve it, just makes we wonder. :icon8:

kzshin 06-09-2004 01:46 PM

didn't new M3 engine blow up during the first year??? maybe reliability and defects were not considered.

Jetpilot718 06-09-2004 01:57 PM

Still, Im curious how a 3.2 litre engine can bang out a reliable 333hp at the crank... Isn't there something they have that we can copy and make better??

teh215 06-09-2004 02:01 PM


Originally posted by Jetpilot718
Still, Im curious how a 3.2 litre engine can bang out a reliable 333hp at the crank... Isn't there something they have that we can copy and make better??
I would bet that if we had reworked heads, intake manifold and cams and the ability to spin the motor to 8,000rpm we could post alot higher numbers with the VQ.

604Z 06-09-2004 02:43 PM


Originally posted by kzshin
didn't new M3 engine blow up during the first year??? maybe reliability and defects were not considered.


The M3's that were manufactured in certain months of 2000 had cases of spun crank bearings. These issue were not due to engine relaibilty but due to imporper care during assembly. So it can't really be called an unreliable engine, nor it is one! But BMW certainly had problems manufacturing it initially.

604Z 06-09-2004 02:49 PM


Originally posted by Jetpilot718
Still, Im curious how a 3.2 litre engine can bang out a reliable 333hp at the crank... Isn't there something they have that we can copy and make better??

Its high horsepower numbers are due to its high compression ratio and I'm certain it can be accomplised in the Z engine as well, but if you consider that its a straight six (which due to its longer crank should produce more toque) and has only 262 ftlbs of troque and the z's V6 has has 274 lbs of torque it dosen't seem so powerfull anymore does it? but I'm certian NISSAN could take some que's from the S54 to bump up the HP numbers in the Z.

JonsilvZ 06-09-2004 04:54 PM

The M3 engines have 6 individual throttle openings meaning alot more air then a single butterfly. Its high tech which costs alot. They shouldve put a 3.5 to make it more reliable. 333hp from a 3.2 is pushing it.

Silverstone_350 06-09-2004 05:04 PM

makes me proud to be a Z driver :D

we own the ferrari............... well not really, but kinda ;)

elyliu 06-09-2004 05:08 PM

so idealy if we had the same HP/displacement ratio as the M3, we would be getting 364HP!!!!! That would be nice to have :).....

Then again if we had that, our Zs probably would cost $70k....

Jetpilot718 06-09-2004 05:18 PM


Originally posted by elyliu
so idealy if we had the same HP/displacement ratio as the M3, we would be getting 364HP!!!!! That would be nice to have :).....

Then again if we had that, our Zs probably would cost $70k....

But, the difference is the Z would be worth the money! :icon18:

Apexi350z 06-09-2004 05:36 PM

We beat out Ferrari? wow!


On the road, the M3 translates its power into zero to 100km/h (62mph) in 5.2 seconds
also, 0-62mph=5.2sec? that doesn't seem any faster than our Z??

JonsilvZ 06-09-2004 05:38 PM

People wouldnt spend that much $ for a Nissan sports car. Remember the 300ZX TT had to discontinue because of slow sales- it cost too much. But it would be nice if Nissan came out with a limited twin turbo Z.

elyliu 06-09-2004 06:28 PM


also, 0-62mph=5.2sec? that doesn't seem any faster than our Z?? [/B]
M3 was never THAT much faster than the Z.....

604Z 06-09-2004 07:26 PM


Originally posted by elyliu
M3 was never THAT much faster than the Z.....


Actually those are just advertized numbers its not common for SMG M3's to post sub five - high four second 0 - 60 numbers.

DragonGcoupe 06-09-2004 10:04 PM


Originally posted by JonsilvZ
People wouldnt spend that much $ for a Nissan sports car. Remember the 300ZX TT had to discontinue because of slow sales- it cost too much. But it would be nice if Nissan came out with a limited twin turbo Z.
I do not believe this is the case. In the mid 90's, the SUV trend became increasingly popular. It was also a decline of sport cars. There were less middle end sports car out (such as the Z, G35, S2000) and companies had trouble selling such performance sports cars like the 300ZX. The big trio of legends, the Mazda RX7 TT, the Toyota Supra TT, and the Nissan 300ZX TT all discontinued from 95-97.

I believe that the sports car trend is back now. From real performance, affordable sports cars from the factory such as the Z, to performance sport sedans like the TL and G35 sedan, you can see the trend back to sports cars. More cars are offered in manual transmissions now. Mercedes is changing from its traditional 3-valve per cylinder SOHC to a 4-valve per cylinder DOHC for their new 3.5L engine, which will be starting in the new 2005 SLK 350. I think that a sports car trend is on the rise again. I think that Nissan WILL offer TT G35's and 350Z's along with the GTR. The Toyota Supra is also supposedly coming back. It's a good time for sports cars.

kzshin 06-09-2004 10:14 PM

Yeah, I agree with DragonGcoupe also. Now is different than before. I will believed if they sale brand new Supra TT, RX-7 or the 300ZX TT today instead of early 90s, the sales number will be alot higher. Today aftermarket trends are booming and alot more people today appreciate these Japanese sports. All these really helps the sales. Not to mentioned that at early 90s Japanese autos suffered from high Yen to dollar ratio.

kzshin 06-09-2004 10:17 PM

Suprise me that no one bring up S2000's 2.0L 240 hp engine while talking about M3's high Hp/disp engine.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:11 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands