Why does G35C outhandle the 350Z?
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why does G35C outhandle the 350Z?
Anyone else read that Road & Track? They said the G35C is more stable through corners while exhibiting higher slalom speeds and higher grip on the skidpad... This can't all be just tire wear? Did the engineers actually make their luxury sports coupe sportier than their pure sports car??
#2
Registered User
It says in the article that :
"And thanks to its slightly longer wheelbase (112.2 in. to the Z's 104.3 in.), the car feels more balanced and stable through corners than the Z, especialy noticeable through quick left/right transitions where the Z's rear end can become a touch twitchy."
I think that they should have but a little bigger differnce in price between the Z and the G35 Coupe. But then again you are not getting any heritige like the Z.
"And thanks to its slightly longer wheelbase (112.2 in. to the Z's 104.3 in.), the car feels more balanced and stable through corners than the Z, especialy noticeable through quick left/right transitions where the Z's rear end can become a touch twitchy."
I think that they should have but a little bigger differnce in price between the Z and the G35 Coupe. But then again you are not getting any heritige like the Z.
#3
The mitsu 3000gt was always heavily regarded as being the absolute best when mags did comparos back in the day....
just think how rediculous that it. The 3000gt!?!? It weighed like 3700lbs or something like that. Yuck. The mags always noted how planted and solid and non twitchy the rear end was, just like they are saying for the 3400lbs G35c.
my point, there is always more to the picure...they are not saying the G is better. The Z will spank spank spank the G at the track, but yes the G is stable cuz its a fatty. Yes, its weight will offer some advantages, but will also come with disadvantages...
also..F*CK those mags...im sick of em
just think how rediculous that it. The 3000gt!?!? It weighed like 3700lbs or something like that. Yuck. The mags always noted how planted and solid and non twitchy the rear end was, just like they are saying for the 3400lbs G35c.
my point, there is always more to the picure...they are not saying the G is better. The Z will spank spank spank the G at the track, but yes the G is stable cuz its a fatty. Yes, its weight will offer some advantages, but will also come with disadvantages...
also..F*CK those mags...im sick of em
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
I don't think they ever really thought to much of the 3000GT. Look at this article from Car and Driver. <a href=http://www.caranddriver.com/xp/Caranddriver/comparisontests/1997/August/199708_comparisontest_lifeb.xml?keywords=3000%20gt> Life starts at 40K</a>
#5
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 4,084
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by rpgonzalez
also..F*CK those mags...im sick of em
also..F*CK those mags...im sick of em
#6
Guest
Posts: n/a
The G35C DOES NOT outhandle the Z. Saying it feels more stable translates to, "I am not a good enough driver to control a true sportscar like the Z, so to me the G35 handles better." Unless in car math heavier, softer suspension, longer, and less power = faster, better handling.
#7
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 23,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by rpgonzalez
The mitsu 3000gt was always heavily regarded as being the absolute best when mags did comparos back in the day....
just think how rediculous that it. The 3000gt!?!? It weighed like 3700lbs or something like that. Yuck. The mags always noted how planted and solid and non twitchy the rear end was, just like they are saying for the 3400lbs G35c.
my point, there is always more to the picure...they are not saying the G is better. The Z will spank spank spank the G at the track, but yes the G is stable cuz its a fatty. Yes, its weight will offer some advantages, but will also come with disadvantages...
also..F*CK those mags...im sick of em
The mitsu 3000gt was always heavily regarded as being the absolute best when mags did comparos back in the day....
just think how rediculous that it. The 3000gt!?!? It weighed like 3700lbs or something like that. Yuck. The mags always noted how planted and solid and non twitchy the rear end was, just like they are saying for the 3400lbs G35c.
my point, there is always more to the picure...they are not saying the G is better. The Z will spank spank spank the G at the track, but yes the G is stable cuz its a fatty. Yes, its weight will offer some advantages, but will also come with disadvantages...
also..F*CK those mags...im sick of em
Just my $.02 as a former 3000GT owner. (I have much more that I can say, but that should suffice)
Trending Topics
#8
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 23,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by venom42
The G35C DOES NOT outhandle the Z. Saying it feels more stable translates to, "I am not a good enough driver to control a true sportscar like the Z, so to me the G35 handles better." Unless in car math heavier, softer suspension, longer, and less power = faster, better handling.
The G35C DOES NOT outhandle the Z. Saying it feels more stable translates to, "I am not a good enough driver to control a true sportscar like the Z, so to me the G35 handles better." Unless in car math heavier, softer suspension, longer, and less power = faster, better handling.
#9
Registered User
Originally posted by venom42
The G35C DOES NOT outhandle the Z. Saying it feels more stable translates to, "I am not a good enough driver to control a true sportscar like the Z, so to me the G35 handles better." Unless in car math heavier, softer suspension, longer, and less power = faster, better handling.
The G35C DOES NOT outhandle the Z. Saying it feels more stable translates to, "I am not a good enough driver to control a true sportscar like the Z, so to me the G35 handles better." Unless in car math heavier, softer suspension, longer, and less power = faster, better handling.
I guess the new G35C owners are going to read this horseshit, push their cars beyond their limits and cause a glut of G35C bodywork. I watched it happen with the CL-S when it first came out and that was an arguably safer, FWD car.
#10
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: maryland
Posts: 2,572
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Your whole question is inacurate. Just because one car mag said the G35 coupe felt more stable bla bla bla. That does not mean the G can outhandle the Z. You should ask how come the G has a faster slalom etc..
Here's what you do, with 2 cars with nearly the same hp, weight, etc. In order for one car to outhandle another car it has to lap a track faster.
So far we do not have any data. I have a hard time believing a G will be faster than a Z on the track.
Here's what you do, with 2 cars with nearly the same hp, weight, etc. In order for one car to outhandle another car it has to lap a track faster.
So far we do not have any data. I have a hard time believing a G will be faster than a Z on the track.
#11
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 23,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by droidekaus
Well said. If my Z felt any more stable through 75MPH switchbacks, I'd think I was driving a Cadillac. You can get the Z f**ked up in a turn, you just have to drive it poorly.
I guess the new G35C owners are going to read this horseshit, push their cars beyond their limits and cause a glut of G35C bodywork. I watched it happen with the CL-S when it first came out and that was an arguably safer, FWD car.
Well said. If my Z felt any more stable through 75MPH switchbacks, I'd think I was driving a Cadillac. You can get the Z f**ked up in a turn, you just have to drive it poorly.
I guess the new G35C owners are going to read this horseshit, push their cars beyond their limits and cause a glut of G35C bodywork. I watched it happen with the CL-S when it first came out and that was an arguably safer, FWD car.
#12
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 766
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Outside of the test conditions and the drivers I think the main factors is the tires:
Z with strock Bridgestones = 0.88 g's on skid pad
G32 with Michelin Pilot Sports = 0.92 g's
Z with unnamed Bridgestones = 1.0 g's (at Pheonix testing per RxO).
RxO, please let us know what model Bridgestones were used in that Pheonix test. Thanks in advance.
Z with strock Bridgestones = 0.88 g's on skid pad
G32 with Michelin Pilot Sports = 0.92 g's
Z with unnamed Bridgestones = 1.0 g's (at Pheonix testing per RxO).
RxO, please let us know what model Bridgestones were used in that Pheonix test. Thanks in advance.
#13
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There is a whole other factor here as well. The guys doing the test drive, drive the car for maybe a day to half a day before they begin their tests. After only this short amount of time to try and get a feel for the car and then write their report. If a mag reviewer says that it feels more or less stable in no way reflects the true performance of any given car.
Personaly when I jump in a car to give it a rip around the track I tend to have more cofidence in a longer wheelbase car as aposed to a short wheel base because it's less twitchy. Doesn't mean that only a long wheelbase car handles better, just that I have more confidence in pushing it. Had they had more time you would have seen the g's of the Z comming up and the things that make the G stable and solid an actual handicap, hindering any further progress.
Personaly when I jump in a car to give it a rip around the track I tend to have more cofidence in a longer wheelbase car as aposed to a short wheel base because it's less twitchy. Doesn't mean that only a long wheelbase car handles better, just that I have more confidence in pushing it. Had they had more time you would have seen the g's of the Z comming up and the things that make the G stable and solid an actual handicap, hindering any further progress.
#14
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Frisco, TX
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This month's Car & Driver has an article on how they test cars and how to interpret the data. Just because a car looks good on paper doesn't mean it's better. Some cars are harder to drive to the limit than others.
Don't let magazine numbers bring ya down. Take your Z to a roadcourse and I guarantee you'll have sooo much fun that you won't care if it puts down .88g's or 1.00g's.
My $0.02.
Michael.
Don't let magazine numbers bring ya down. Take your Z to a roadcourse and I guarantee you'll have sooo much fun that you won't care if it puts down .88g's or 1.00g's.
My $0.02.
Michael.
#15
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just because a car "feels" more stable does not mean it handles better. The Z is probably twitchier to the testers because it is quicker steering because of the longer wheelbase. A Hummer is very stable through the corner, but is a 3 ton truck. Doesn't mean it's faster.
It's always been like that. Nimbler handling = twitchy. It takes an expert driver to drive a fast car fast, but for the average man, an easier to drive car equals a faster car. It's when you pit one against the other on a track with skilled drivers that you can tell which one is the superior car.
It's always been like that. Nimbler handling = twitchy. It takes an expert driver to drive a fast car fast, but for the average man, an easier to drive car equals a faster car. It's when you pit one against the other on a track with skilled drivers that you can tell which one is the superior car.
#16
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OK.. so all I have seen so far from these posts is that "Twitchy is good because it means its quicker?". Remeber, the G35C is only about 100 lbs heavier (i believe) than the Touring 350Z. Guess Nissan should've made the cars further apart, it seems to me that cannabilization is going to be occuring a LOT with the G35C and 350Z... Good for Z owners though, less cars on the road!
#17
Registered User
I recall a few reviews commenting on how the Z understeered at the limit, yet R&T says the G35C is better balanced AND less twitchy? Seems contradictory to me. I think most of the posts have covered quite well the fact that one magazine has said one thing about the G35C, and while that data isn't worthless - it isn't gospel either.
I'll be interested to see how the rest of the reviews of the G35C go.
-D'oh!
I'll be interested to see how the rest of the reviews of the G35C go.
-D'oh!
#18
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Frisco, TX
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by D'oh
I recall a few reviews commenting on how the Z understeered at the limit, yet R&T says the G35C is better balanced AND less twitchy? Seems contradictory to me. I think most of the posts have covered quite well the fact that one magazine has said one thing about the G35C, and while that data isn't worthless - it isn't gospel either.
I recall a few reviews commenting on how the Z understeered at the limit, yet R&T says the G35C is better balanced AND less twitchy? Seems contradictory to me. I think most of the posts have covered quite well the fact that one magazine has said one thing about the G35C, and while that data isn't worthless - it isn't gospel either.
The G35c is better balanced because of the longer wheelbase. Likewise, the 300 2+2 is better balanced than the 300 2-seater because of the longer wheelbase. But that's only marginal to the everyday driver.
As to why the G35c looks better on paper than the 350... read Csaba Csere's column in the last C&D. What he says about magazine test numbers explains alot.
Michael.
Last edited by Michael-Dallas; 10-09-2002 at 07:52 AM.
#19
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The 53/47 ratio isn't for understeer btw, supposedly its part of the FM platform because they want their cars to be "front loaded" so that when accelerating through a corner the car achieves a perfect 50/50 balance as weight goes to the rear (acceleration squat).
#20
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 4,084
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know it's been said, but I have to agree. Most of these car mags are intended to inform the "everyday" driver, not gear heads like most of us. You have to take everything they say with a grain of salt.
Besides, none of those test drivers impress me with their drving skills, they just can't handle a good car.
Besides, none of those test drivers impress me with their drving skills, they just can't handle a good car.