Notices
2009+ 370Z General discussion and news for the Z34 (2009+) Nissan 370z with the new 3.7-liter V6

350z VS. 370z (photo comparison)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-10-2009, 04:57 PM
  #21  
R3belzBRN
New Member
iTrader: (3)
 
R3belzBRN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: BRN, Asia
Posts: 581
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Cool pics of the differnce btwn our 350z and the 370z bro.. keep it up!
Old 01-10-2009, 04:58 PM
  #22  
Kiriller
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Kiriller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Richmond Hill
Posts: 2,722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Here is a chop i did, had to level the cars for true comparison



another side by side coming..
Old 01-10-2009, 04:59 PM
  #23  
newtkindred
Registered User
 
newtkindred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: san francisco, california
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by highflyinkilla
Thats the height from the top of the roofline. Nothing to do with how low it sits to ground.
OK, I drew a line horizontal from the bottom of the front tire of both cars and measured vertically from this horizontal line. They seem to be the same.
Old 01-10-2009, 05:00 PM
  #24  
newtkindred
Registered User
 
newtkindred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: san francisco, california
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kiriller
Here is a chop i did, had to level the cars for true comparison



another side by side coming..
funny, i was working on the same thing. But you beat me to it! But measure it how I did. From a horizontal line from the bottom of the tires to the lower edge of the rocker panel. What do you get then? I mean, for the overall ride height?
Old 01-10-2009, 05:06 PM
  #25  
newtkindred
Registered User
 
newtkindred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: san francisco, california
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kiriller
Here is a chop i did, had to level the cars for true comparison



another side by side coming..
Oh, there is one problem with the photo. You see that when the photo was taken they did not take it standing at the exact center between the two cars? They are standing more in front of the 370Z, in effect, making them closer to it, causing it to be slightly larger. Picky but true. But I think that is why it doesn't make sense.
Old 01-10-2009, 05:06 PM
  #26  
Kiriller
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Kiriller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Richmond Hill
Posts: 2,722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by newtkindred
funny, i was working on the same thing. But you beat me to it! But measure it how I did. From a horizontal line from the bottom of the tires to the lower edge of the rocker panel. What do you get then? I mean, for the overall ride height?
cars are not on the same level, i adjusted them. another pic in process of uploading..
Old 01-10-2009, 05:06 PM
  #27  
Kiriller
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Kiriller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Richmond Hill
Posts: 2,722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

here we go

Old 01-10-2009, 05:09 PM
  #28  
newtkindred
Registered User
 
newtkindred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: san francisco, california
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kiriller
here we go


Thanks, now this one makes sense to me.
Old 01-10-2009, 05:14 PM
  #29  
Kiriller
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Kiriller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Richmond Hill
Posts: 2,722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

and last picture, enjoy

i have adjusted the cars as close as possible to there is no camera magic or difference in picture prospectives, enjoy and keep it civil once again thanks to the thread starter for the pics

Old 01-10-2009, 05:18 PM
  #30  
newtkindred
Registered User
 
newtkindred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: san francisco, california
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kiriller
and last picture, enjoy

i have adjusted the cars as close as possible to there is no camera magic or difference in picture prospectives, enjoy and keep it civil once again thanks to the thread starter for the pics

Man, you did a darn good job. Pretty much what they are supposed to be.
Old 01-10-2009, 05:19 PM
  #31  
TX-350Z-TX
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
TX-350Z-TX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: AUSTIN, TX
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

damnit, i should have brought the level, and measuring tape with me before i shot the pics. : ) niceto see the thread getting so much attention though.
Old 01-10-2009, 05:21 PM
  #32  
newtkindred
Registered User
 
newtkindred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: san francisco, california
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TX-350Z-TX
damnit, i should have brought the level, and measuring tape with me before i shot the pics. : ) niceto see the thread getting so much attention though.
Man, that is all you had to do, just pull out the measuring tape. Look what you have caused.
Old 01-10-2009, 05:22 PM
  #33  
Kiriller
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Kiriller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Richmond Hill
Posts: 2,722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TX-350Z-TX
damnit, i should have brought the level, and measuring tape with me before i shot the pics. : ) niceto see the thread getting so much attention though.
lol no need, photoshop helps it really works side by side (front & back) because cars elevation is +-millimeter.
Old 01-10-2009, 05:25 PM
  #34  
SniperHunter
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
SniperHunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 4,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Rooflines are nearly identical, but the mirrors indicate a lower beltline, and bumpers indicate a lower stance/clearance for the 350Z.

Last edited by SniperHunter; 01-10-2009 at 05:29 PM.
Old 01-10-2009, 05:25 PM
  #35  
TX-350Z-TX
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
TX-350Z-TX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: AUSTIN, TX
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

thats pretty good work. i am just tickled i was even able to upload the pics in the thread......thought I was doin good. : )

33 replies and not one mention of my plate. hmmm?
its all good! i really just wanted to be able to put some "real life" pics out there for everyone to enjoy.....mission accomplished!
Old 01-10-2009, 05:27 PM
  #36  
Kiriller
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Kiriller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Richmond Hill
Posts: 2,722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TX-350Z-TX
thats pretty good work. i am just tickled i was even able to upload the pics in the thread......thought I was doin good. : )

33 replies and not one mention of my plate. hmmm?
its all good! i really just wanted to be able to put some "real life" pics out there for everyone to enjoy.....mission accomplished!
lol i have that plate on one of my custom plates that i wanna do, i love it lol i theres a big thread with custom plate ideas and got it from there, maybe you posted, maybe some one else
Old 01-10-2009, 05:33 PM
  #37  
Sunset350ZR
New Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Sunset350ZR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 829
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Measured dimensions I understand but visually the 370Z looks much bigger in perso IMO. The 370Z definitely looks different from the 350 but better I think not. Just like those that thought the 300ZX was and is the best looking Z, I guarantee the 350Z folks will continue to think their 350Zs look better. Then there will be a whole new crop that think the 370Z is drop dead gorgeous. I commend Nissan for being able to make 3 cars that will elicit such emotion. Personally I love both my 350Z and would not trade either for the 370Z based on looks. Add performance to the equation (still remains to be seen AIMO) and I may have to sell my 03 track for a 370Z in a year or two.
Old 01-10-2009, 05:38 PM
  #38  
newtkindred
Registered User
 
newtkindred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: san francisco, california
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Arnold K.
Rooflines are nearly identical, but the mirrors indicate a lower beltline, and bumpers indicate a lower stance/clearance for the 350Z.
Is the bumper height raised in the 370Z for some sort of regulations? From the side profile, the stance seems to be about the same to me.
Old 01-10-2009, 05:44 PM
  #39  
SniperHunter
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
SniperHunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 4,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by newtkindred
Is the bumper height raised in the 370Z for some sort of regulations? From the side profile, the stance seems to be about the same to me.
Probably because they realized the car would scrape too much even with a stock suspension. Notice how large the new plastic scraper is now directly on the lip? The 350Zs had a stupid plastic scraper that was buried behind the lip which left it very susceptible to scrapes - case in point...my lip.
Old 01-10-2009, 08:18 PM
  #40  
ZPatrick
Registered User
 
ZPatrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Los angeles
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I like your 350z.


Quick Reply: 350z VS. 370z (photo comparison)



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:08 AM.