Navygolf13

iTrader: (5)

Yes, look at what engineer said that I quoted. I am not sure of this, it is just what I assume.

In my mind he is lucky he gets to gimp away

Come on guys, I will listen to what customers have to say, but these guys are shady! They get let go from a company and then start spreading all this stuff? Even if I wasnt a satisfied customer of VRT I would not listen to these guys!

IIQuickSilverII

iTrader: (13)

so why post as if defending vrt then? honestly the biggest part of whats being said about vrt and how shady they are is from the experiences customers are posting... from the legal troubles and customer trying to sue them...weather what those guys say is true or not... there is plenty of other evidence to know of VRT and for you to realize that its best you stop directly and indirectly defending them.

Hydrazine

iTrader: (53)

Assult and battery is serious stuff .
Damn. This drama thread just gets better and better.

Navygolf13

iTrader: (5)

I dont know what the deal is but I HAVE stopped defending them. I am responding to the things that are being said by people that I know not to be true. I am not saying anything about the customers stories here and I wont unless I learn something else. Look, I am not trying to make VRT look squeaky clean, I am trying to help sort through the BS and from my experience with VQ and engineer whatever they are saying needs to be deleted because I dont believe one word.

As for other customers stories, I have talked to some of them and made up my mind about those incidents and will leave it at that. The other people I have not talked to, I have not made up my mind one way or the other. Look, I dont want this to be another thread about me defending VRT cause I am not. I have made up my mind on some things and others I am waiting for more information from both sides to say who is right and who is wrong. There is nothing wrong with that, if by me telling of my experience with VQ and engineer I am defending VRT then I am sorry.

fallenromeo

iTrader: (11)

What the hell are you talking about? MrA and I are on good terms. I have always posted the truth and I didn't hide anything. I posted our resolution and said I was happy with it too.

Personally, I don't think you are in any position to pass judgement on anyone here, and I don't think anyone here wants to hear it either.

What the hell? What happened? Did I miss something guys?

Navygolf13

iTrader: (5)

Yeah.

fallenromeo

iTrader: (11)

So what did I miss? can someone please post a link so I can catch up on what is going on?

Navygolf13

iTrader: (5)

If you read the thread here is where it was talked about a little, other than that I do not know.

failsafe306

iTrader: (38)

From what I gather, karma came back around and b!tch-slapped MrA

fallenromeo

iTrader: (11)

ok, I thought there was another thread posted about this incident or something. When did this happen?

IIQuickSilverII

iTrader: (13)

lol robert...miaplaya must be pissed to read more cryptic posts lol

doug

iTrader: (5)

g-X

iTrader: (1)

Dude dynos dont lie

https://my350z.com/forum/forced-induction/282572-disappointing-dyno-help.html

Sam@GTM just confirmed it too that im running lean and only makin 300whp

Anyways when did i change my story?

g-X

iTrader: (1)

FYI

Anybody that did business w/ VRT before Sept06 can dispute w/ BAR

http://www.smogcheck.ca.gov/StdPage....eComplaint.htm

Looks like their licenses werent in order before then. This was the time when he was doing stuff outta his house. Looks like BAR doesnt like that sorta thing..

Hexxum001

iTrader: (3)

Hmmmm . . . sounds a lot like my friends car that was "supposedly" pulling close to 550whp only to find out that it was only putting down approx. 370whp on the dyno. And as many times as he asked Mr. A for the dyno sheet, what do you know, he always had an excuse for not having it. Could it be because it never existed?!?!?! What a scumbag!!

Navygolf13

iTrader: (5)

So funny, that dynos dont lie when they confirm what you want, but when people are questioning VRT they can be changed. Whatever....I dont care what your car is running now or was running. How long has it been since you picked up your car from VRT and what changes were made between now and then? As far as I am concerned I dont care what you say or how you say it. I dont believe you and I wont at this point.

It is too bad I deleted me PMs. But you said the suspension that VRT installed was not clearing something, cant remember what it was, sorry. Well, you forgot to mention that is wasnt a problem for over a month until you bent a rim on a pothole and the suspension. You then admitted it later...but I guess that isnt changing your story. Look, I dont car about you or your car, I am glad you have it somehwere you feel you can trust. Just leave me out of your BS and move on.

bboypuertoroc

iTrader: (4)

I still can't believe Navygolf... there are so many people coming forward with their experiences there but yet you STILL don't believe anyone. There is absolutely NO evidence of no wrong doing by VRT. You are the only person defending them (or, not defending them just asking for proof like you say).

Ever play averages? Take out the two most extreme sides of this case (you and let's say VQ) and what are you left with? I'll tell you one thing... not a single person defending them or asking for proof of wrong doing.

And now with the recent removal of vendor status and no response from VRT, the hole is getting deeper. I mean honestly, if there was ANY proof of right on their behalf, don't you think they woulda defended themselves?

buzzardmountain

iTrader: (17)

Nice try.....

Kettle please meet pot.



Move on troll.

IIQuickSilverII

iTrader: (13)

CONfirm this dili on their license not int order before sept 06

IIQuickSilverII

iTrader: (13)

POST MOST RECENT DYNOSHEET!