Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

6266 vs 6466 vs 6766

Old 07-05-2016, 06:56 PM
  #1  
james12345pt
New Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
james12345pt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: asheville, nc
Posts: 215
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default 6266 vs 6466 vs 6766

Which of theses three Percision turbos can achieve 600-650 whp on 93 pump?

Last edited by james12345pt; 07-05-2016 at 07:19 PM.
Old 07-05-2016, 07:11 PM
  #2  
james12345pt
New Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
james12345pt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: asheville, nc
Posts: 215
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Which of theses three Percision turbos can achieve 600-650 whp on 93 pump?
Which would have the quickest spool up? Finally, Which turbo and what AR housing would be needed to achieve fastest spool and 600-650 whp? I am planning on upgrading my powerlab setup from the gt35r with 1.06ar. t3 to a t4 turbo and push it another 100whp but want to have a quick spool similar to my current gt35r. I have an built motor from injected but I dont think it could handle more than low 600's whp so the turbo would not need room for growth down the road but it should be able to spool quick, long torque curve with max power around 600-650 reving the motor to 7500 - 8000 rpms. Thanks

Last edited by james12345pt; 07-06-2016 at 04:11 AM.
The following users liked this post:
Conway_160 (07-06-2016)
Old 07-05-2016, 07:39 PM
  #3  
turboed350z
Registered User
 
turboed350z's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: arizona
Posts: 2,892
Received 277 Likes on 215 Posts
Default

The gt35r should reach 600 easy. The 6262 is a good turbo that spools fast and should hit 600 also.

6266 wilk hit 600 easy but spools slower than 6262.
Old 07-06-2016, 03:38 AM
  #4  
Conway_160
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Conway_160's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Pan Handle
Posts: 2,559
Received 341 Likes on 280 Posts
Default

Doesn't it require e85 to hit 600 w/the GT35R?
Old 07-06-2016, 08:14 AM
  #5  
CK_32
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
CK_32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: California
Posts: 3,635
Received 366 Likes on 315 Posts
Default

Well your kind of asking the magical question.


Bigger turbo usually = more power, but in turn takes longer to spool.


More power = bigger turbo, faster spool = smaller turbo generally speaking.


So you have to determine what the sweet spot for your build is. Or just get the biggest turbo and forget about spool, or take a chance with a smaller one if you want a fast spool and hope it can supply your power goals.


Have you even looked into SC's?


I think that might be up your ally. No spool required


But Im in the same boat, either 35r or 6266 for my 400WHP build, but still have the availability to go to 550+ range. If I ever decide I want to go into debt and the head aches for the rest of my life lol

Last edited by CK_32; 07-06-2016 at 09:05 AM.
Old 07-06-2016, 09:38 AM
  #6  
Conway_160
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Conway_160's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Pan Handle
Posts: 2,559
Received 341 Likes on 280 Posts
Default

The only problem with a supercharger is, you have to wind out the motor to make your power, and you NEVER have the torque with a supercharger you will with a turbo.

Also boost on a blower usally doesn't start untill 2500-3000 depending on pulleys. Even then its 1-4psi also depending on pulleys.

Personally get I would get a turbo company or boosted Performance and ask them about turbos.
Old 07-06-2016, 09:45 AM
  #7  
CK_32
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
CK_32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: California
Posts: 3,635
Received 366 Likes on 315 Posts
Default

Yea, which is why I am leaning towards turbo my self. Just threw it out there if "spooling" was a major concern.




Maybe even look into a anti lag or scroll set up if your bawls out serious.


Not sure how practical those would be for a street car tho. But would be about the answer to OP's question. No lag and probably meet his power goals.

Last edited by CK_32; 07-06-2016 at 09:46 AM.
Old 07-06-2016, 09:52 AM
  #8  
james12345pt
New Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
james12345pt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: asheville, nc
Posts: 215
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CK_32
Well your kind of asking the magical question.


Bigger turbo usually = more power, but in turn takes longer to spool.


More power = bigger turbo, faster spool = smaller turbo generally speaking.


So you have to determine what the sweet spot for your build is. Or just get the biggest turbo and forget about spool, or take a chance with a smaller one if you want a fast spool and hope it can supply your power goals.

Have you even looked into SC's?


I think that might be up your ally. No spool required


But Im in the same boat, either 35r or 6266 for my 400WHP build, but still have the availability to go to 550+ range. If I ever decide I want to go into debt and the head aches for the rest of my life lol
I have a powerlab kit with gt35r and have not been able to get past 525 on pump. Air flow through the hotside of the turbo is the limiting factor. I could reach my goal with e85 but it will cost me 2/3 the amount that a new turbo and tune would so rather have a new turbo and stay with 93 octane. I could sell the used turbo and recoup some of the cost of the upgrade and not have the added expense of having to used e85.

Last edited by james12345pt; 07-06-2016 at 09:57 AM.
Old 07-06-2016, 12:48 PM
  #9  
CK_32
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
CK_32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: California
Posts: 3,635
Received 366 Likes on 315 Posts
Default

Wow good to know.




Looks like 35r is off my list and back to he 6266... Dam I just passed a decent kit for a good price wanting to hold out for a 35r kit too thinking going 35 would be a better kit
Old 07-06-2016, 01:30 PM
  #10  
wisniaPl
Registered User
 
wisniaPl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: NY Long Island
Posts: 105
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by james12345pt
I have a powerlab kit with gt35r and have not been able to get past 525 on pump. Air flow through the hotside of the turbo is the limiting factor. I could reach my goal with e85 but it will cost me 2/3 the amount that a new turbo and tune would so rather have a new turbo and stay with 93 octane. I could sell the used turbo and recoup some of the cost of the upgrade and not have the added expense of having to used e85.
Isnt it cheaper to switch to a bigger housing? I have tial 1.06ar on my powerlab gt35rand it it doesnt restrict it like. 82ar
BTW 6466cea spools as fast as others and you can get way more than 600whp
Also I would look into borg Warner s366 t bey are like 900 already with the housing of your choice, but thats just me
Old 07-06-2016, 03:09 PM
  #11  
Conway_160
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Conway_160's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Pan Handle
Posts: 2,559
Received 341 Likes on 280 Posts
Default

If you want the best possible spool you need billet wheel, ball bearings, and twin scroll.
Old 07-06-2016, 03:11 PM
  #12  
james12345pt
New Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
james12345pt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: asheville, nc
Posts: 215
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wisniaPl
Isnt it cheaper to switch to a bigger housing? I have tial 1.06ar on my powerlab gt35rand it it doesnt restrict it like. 82ar
BTW 6466cea spools as fast as others and you can get way more than 600whp
Also I would look into borg Warner s366 t bey are like 900 already with the housing of your choice, but thats just me
I already have the 1.03 t3 housing for the gt35r. I bought the powerlab kit about 1 year after it's release and the gt35r was the only option that it came with. I have had the car for about 7 years, 15,000 miles on built engine, with the current setup and am looking to push the power up but not go crazy due to the fact that my motor was built with a 600-650 whp in mind. Since I did my build, Powerlab has added the ability to use a bigger turbo with these kit. I can buy the two new pipes to accommondate a larger turbo separately and go bigger but I know I will never purchase another engine just to handle more power past the limit of my current setup. Therefore , I am trying to find the "sweet spot" between spool and my power goal. Believe me I have played with the gt35r and there is no more power to be had for my setup unless I turn to an alternative fuel. PS: My local tuner has a Dyno Dynamics dyno so it does read lower than a Dynojet. How much I do not know.

Last edited by james12345pt; 07-06-2016 at 03:16 PM.
Old 07-06-2016, 03:23 PM
  #13  
i8acobra
New Member
iTrader: (6)
 
i8acobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 7,662
Received 1,265 Likes on 1,014 Posts
Default

Does Precision publish compressor maps? Learn how to read them, then check them out.
The following users liked this post:
Cux350z (07-10-2016)
Old 07-06-2016, 04:14 PM
  #14  
Highway Riding
New Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Highway Riding's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Out on the Highway!
Posts: 5,543
Received 95 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

6266 and be done. Check out Bmccann101's threads for reference. He has the plab kit running the 6266!
The following users liked this post:
james12345pt (07-06-2016)
Old 07-06-2016, 10:22 PM
  #15  
WTFMike
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
WTFMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Scottsdale,Az
Posts: 690
Received 46 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

http://www.motoiq.com/MagazineArticl...CEA-Turbo.aspx
Old 07-09-2016, 11:14 AM
  #16  
thatv35guy
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
thatv35guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 723
Received 59 Likes on 47 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Highway Riding
6266 and be done. Check out Bmccann101's threads for reference. He has the plab kit running the 6266!
Yeah, but I believe he needed race gas to crack 600whp... You can do that with a GT35R on race gas or E85 too. I'd look at the turbo that WTFMike just linked to.
Old 07-09-2016, 05:46 PM
  #17  
wisniaPl
Registered User
 
wisniaPl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: NY Long Island
Posts: 105
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by james12345pt
I already have the 1.03 t3 housing for the gt35r. I bought the powerlab kit about 1 year after it's release and the gt35r was the only option that it came with. I have had the car for about 7 years, 15,000 miles on built engine, with the current setup and am looking to push the power up but not go crazy due to the fact that my motor was built with a 600-650 whp in mind. Since I did my build, Powerlab has added the ability to use a bigger turbo with these kit. I can buy the two new pipes to accommondate a larger turbo separately and go bigger but I know I will never purchase another engine just to handle more power past the limit of my current setup. Therefore , I am trying to find the "sweet spot" between spool and my power goal. Believe me I have played with the gt35r and there is no more power to be had for my setup unless I turn to an alternative fuel. PS: My local tuner has a Dyno Dynamics dyno so it does read lower than a Dynojet. How much I do not know.
Where can I get those 2 pipes to accommodate bigger turbo?
I cut hotside inlet and DP and switched 4 bolt flanges to VBAND along with tial ss housing
You might aswell look into borg Warner s366 instead of precision turbo
Old 07-10-2016, 03:08 AM
  #18  
Cux350z
hatersgonnahate
iTrader: (162)
 
Cux350z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 14,340
Received 956 Likes on 721 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Highway Riding
6266 and be done. Check out Bmccann101's threads for reference. He has the plab kit running the 6266!
Originally Posted by thatv35guy
Yeah, but I believe he needed race gas to crack 600whp... You can do that with a GT35R on race gas or E85 too. I'd look at the turbo that WTFMike just linked to.
did he ever post a dyno graph?
Old 07-10-2016, 05:49 AM
  #19  
james12345pt
New Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
james12345pt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: asheville, nc
Posts: 215
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wisniaPl
Where can I get those 2 pipes to accommodate bigger turbo?
I cut hotside inlet and DP and switched 4 bolt flanges to VBAND along with tial ss housing
You might aswell look into borg Warner s366 instead of precision turbo
I spoke with Intense about a 1-2 months ago and they carry the vband pipes; the hot side in and first section of downpipe has to be replaced. The two sections wee not that costly but I don't remember the price that was quoted. I don't know if they carry a t4 mount but I can get that fab locally if needed. Also, I think there is an extension welded on the inlet side of the turbo housing. I would like to see a dyno with the 6266 turbo if anyone has one.

Last edited by james12345pt; 07-10-2016 at 05:53 AM.
Old 07-10-2016, 08:52 AM
  #20  
steven350
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
 
steven350's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 777
Received 18 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

My 6262 spools up quick but top end falls off ... I've read 6266 or 64, with fuel upgrades of course , should be your choice. ...

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 6266 vs 6466 vs 6766



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:49 PM.