Originally posted by Enron Exec I remember reading that the JWT cams are designed around NA applications. These FI brain people are smart and im hear to learn too. :icon14: :p So is there a consensus on what cams are good for stock VQ35DE heads aimming for 500-600 rwhp range? |
So is there a consensus on what cams are good for stock VQ35DE heads aimming for 500-600 rwhp range?
I wish there was but as far as I know al the cams on the market are designed for NA applications. |
based on the specs given, the NISMO's are not a fantastic choice for FI.
The mild Tomei's would be a better choice IMHO, with the 264's being kick *** As phunk mentioned there are def gains to be had, but it all has to work as a unit. Porting heads alone can yield nothing. But do the right porting with the right cam and a manifold that can make it all work and you'll be golden. |
Originally posted by Z1 Performance based on the specs given, the NISMO's are not a fantastic choice for FI. The mild Tomei's would be a better choice IMHO, with the 264's being kick *** As phunk mentioned there are def gains to be had, but it all has to work as a unit. Porting heads alone can yield nothing. But do the right porting with the right cam and a manifold that can make it all work and you'll be golden. |
well, on a turbo car (I dont have much practical experience with SC), you can get away with a much poorer design on the intake side and still net good power. However, when shooting for the bigger numbers on a turbo car, the head is the single biggest area where gains can be had. For many turbo guys, like mentioned above, most people here will be content with the std heads and cams.
For those going for the BIG numbers though, the heads will prove fruitful :) |
Originally posted by Z1 Performance well, on a turbo car (I dont have much practical experience with SC), you can get away with a much poorer design on the intake side and still net good power. However, when shooting for the bigger numbers on a turbo car, the head is the single biggest area where gains can be had. For many turbo guys, like mentioned above, most people here will be content with the std heads and cams. For those going for the BIG numbers though, the heads will prove fruitful :) |
Originally posted by Z1 Performance based on the specs given, the NISMO's are not a fantastic choice for FI. The mild Tomei's would be a better choice IMHO, with the 264's being kick *** As phunk mentioned there are def gains to be had, but it all has to work as a unit. Porting heads alone can yield nothing. But do the right porting with the right cam and a manifold that can make it all work and you'll be golden. |
Can some one tell me the lift and duration of the stock cams ?
|
Z33 VQ35DE Solid type shaft, 238° intake duration, 240° exhaust duration, 9.20 intake cam lift (mm), 9.20 exhaust cam lift(mm), 125 deg lobe center angle intake, 90° 112° exhaust center angle
|
JeffersonM - you must be getting tired typing that all over the place ;)
booger - will they work? Sure. Would I bother? nope |
CAMS
Originally posted by Lorca@Z1 So is there a consensus on what cams are good for stock VQ35DE heads aimming for 500-600 rwhp range? I wish there was but as far as I know al the cams on the market are designed for NA applications. Any input on this? |
Re: CAMS
Originally posted by G3po Rumor has it that Crane was suppose to have a turbo gring soon. Any input on this? Maybe playing it close to the vest, but it seemed like they were not really interested in the VQ35 market |
CAMs
Originally posted by booger Im not looking to get that big of hp . But the reason I chose the Nismo cams , is the SC its self .And the fact I lowered compression . And I want to keep as much as possible dow low |
NISMO are 262/256
|
The Nismo's are 262/262 duration with .426 lift
|
Originally posted by booger The Nismo's are 262/262 duration with .426 lift Correct! It is 262 for both exhaust and intake. Not 262 intake/256 exhaust! |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:14 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands