Notices
G35/G37 General discussion and news for Infiniti's G or for full Forums check out MyG37.com or G35Driver.com

New VQ37HR DYNO FROM G37 ! ! ! ! WOOOOOOOW! ! ! !

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-21-2007, 02:07 PM
  #21  
turismo
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
 
turismo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: curl lookin boy
Posts: 8,448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Very impressive!
Old 05-21-2007, 09:04 PM
  #22  
KhanMan
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
KhanMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hollywood California
Posts: 1,686
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

tq looks similar but power damn. I wanna know how i can get those engine working on the DE.
Old 05-22-2007, 04:25 AM
  #23  
VandyZ
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
VandyZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 3,702
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Nissan has said new Z in 2009 as a 2010 model. No specifics yet on the engine, but they said it will be new for 2010, so I am sure the 3.7L will be old news by then.
Old 05-22-2007, 04:44 AM
  #24  
SOLO-350Z
'12 TL SH-AWD
iTrader: (26)
 
SOLO-350Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Alamo
Posts: 6,348
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by VandyZ
Nissan has said new Z in 2009 as a 2010 model. No specifics yet on the engine, but they said it will be new for 2010, so I am sure the 3.7L will be old news by then.
Wrong. It will be a 2009 model not a 2010. It will be out in late 2008. Straight from the the horses mouth and the designer of the Z. Mad Mike.
Old 05-22-2007, 01:08 PM
  #25  
athenG
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
athenG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 2,252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The big question is how will this new engine respond to NA Mod?
Old 05-22-2007, 01:27 PM
  #26  
ral
Z-BIRU
iTrader: (5)
 
ral's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Not bad at all.
Old 05-22-2007, 07:01 PM
  #27  
Damon_Chambers
Registered User
 
Damon_Chambers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South East Texas
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by athenG
The big question is how will this new engine respond to NA Mod?
im more concerned w/ forced induction.
Old 05-22-2007, 07:53 PM
  #28  
NA350Z
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
NA350Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 3,290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Damon_Chambers
im more concerned w/ forced induction.
Supposedly all forged internal means bigger boost on stock block FTW ! ! !
Old 05-22-2007, 09:08 PM
  #29  
cvt
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
cvt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: los angeles area
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

wow...365hp at 3.7L??? almost at the coveted 100hp per liter mark...i think more aggresive cams and higher redline will do the trick...the tq will suck though...lol.
Old 05-25-2007, 05:25 PM
  #30  
THX723
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
THX723's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: So Cal
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What irresoponsible publication by Motor Authority. 365hp @ the flywheel and 25% drivetrain loss for the 6mt?

I would like to see some emperical data on that.
Old 05-25-2007, 05:57 PM
  #31  
DIGItonium
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
DIGItonium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Kansas
Posts: 4,836
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

365HP flywheel power is overly exaggerated [thanks to the media]. Think about cars out there with that much power advertised, and the G37 would be asking for a beating.
Old 05-25-2007, 06:05 PM
  #32  
diwun67
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
 
diwun67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In the wrong lane
Posts: 6,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It's closer to about 350hp at the crank. Still impressive.
Old 05-25-2007, 06:30 PM
  #33  
THX723
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
THX723's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: So Cal
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by diwun67
It's closer to about 350hp at the crank. Still impressive.
I must be again missing something here and must ask where is this 350 figure coming from?

Nissan, a company not traditionally known for underrating, has already publicly released the figure of ~330hp crank in the press release. Given past records, this figure is usually within a few hp of the official rating pending certification and approval. Anything north of say 336 is probably a pipe dream.

Last edited by THX723; 05-25-2007 at 06:33 PM.
Old 05-25-2007, 06:44 PM
  #34  
diwun67
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
 
diwun67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In the wrong lane
Posts: 6,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by THX723
I must be again missing something here and must ask where is this 350 figure coming from?

Nissan, a company not traditionally known for underrating, has already publicly released the figure of ~330hp crank in the press release. Given past records, this figure is usually within a few hp of the official rating pending certification and approval. Anything north of say 336 is probably a pipe dream.
350 - ~17% drivetrain loss is 290.5whp, close to the 287whp it put down on a dyno in these vids from another thread https://my350z.com/forum/other-vehicles/273510-g37-dyno-numbers.html

What's so hard to understand?
Old 05-26-2007, 01:36 AM
  #35  
THX723
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
THX723's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: So Cal
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by diwun67
350 - ~17% drivetrain loss is 290.5whp, close to the 287whp it put down on a dyno in these vids from another thread https://my350z.com/forum/showthread.php?t=273510

What's so hard to understand?
Precisely that, the 17% drivetrain loss, which is an unsubstantiated guess. Automobile magazine did not venture to make such assumption. In addition, the VQ35 dyno they (Automobile Mag.) provided for comparison is and certainly looked like that of the older "non rev-up" VQ35DE model.

If we must play the drivetrain loss voodoo magic game, then it ought to look more like the following:

"Non Rev-up" VQ35DE
Factory rating: 275hp SAE*
Automobile Dynojet rating: 236hp
--> calculated drivetrain loss = ~14.2%

VQ37VHR
Automobile Dynojet rating: 287hp
assuming the particular '08 G35 coupe has similar drivetrain loss @ ~14.2%
--> calculated crank/flywheel power = ~334hp SAE

Coincidence (to the preliminary factory 330hp rating)? Not likely, especially given the +/-3% precision at play for typical chassis dynos.

*Note: based on revised SAE power measurement rating and certification (not to be confused with SAE dyno corrections).

The fact of the matter is modern manual transmission typically do not give up much more than 10% in efficiency. 4-5% of lost from tire to Dynojet roller interface is not uncommon.

Last edited by THX723; 05-26-2007 at 01:50 AM.
Old 05-26-2007, 02:12 AM
  #36  
Skorch
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Skorch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,773
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If the '09 Z will have said numbers or better, I'll be trading in my '07
Old 05-26-2007, 06:49 AM
  #37  
jdifolco
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
jdifolco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yeah def. good bye 07 hello 09.
Old 05-26-2007, 06:50 AM
  #38  
tranceformer95
New Member
iTrader: (20)
 
tranceformer95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 5,399
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jdifolco
yeah def. good bye 07 hello 09.
You just love trading Z's in don't you? lol
Old 05-26-2007, 07:12 AM
  #39  
jdifolco
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
jdifolco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You mean bending over and taking it by the dealer. Hell yea! Nah I didn't loose that much when I got the 07. So we will see. Thats also a year or two from now so who knows what will happen.
Old 05-26-2007, 09:09 AM
  #40  
Fluid1
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Fluid1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NOPE NOPE NOPE
Posts: 11,953
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ghost 350z
Impresive, but not impressed with the torque

You're just not impressed with the actual number. As you can see, the curve is very nice.


Quick Reply: New VQ37HR DYNO FROM G37 ! ! ! ! WOOOOOOOW! ! ! !



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:30 PM.