INJEN CAI Available for 350Z
#42
Registered User
Originally posted by someone
I'll wait for AEM thank you....
I'll wait for AEM thank you....
#44
Registered User
Originally posted by MustGoFastR
AEM already has dyno results which are about the same. Their CAI is much cheaper. They also offer a short ram version.
AEM already has dyno results which are about the same. Their CAI is much cheaper. They also offer a short ram version.
#45
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by TJZ
I hope nobody actually buys the SRI, lol.
I hope nobody actually buys the SRI, lol.
#46
Registered User
Originally posted by z461
That would probably lose power..lol. I just wonder which one will come out first... The AEM they said is another 4-8 weeks before it reaches production, the Injen is another 2-3 weeks.. I wonder... Whichever one comes out first i'm getting it, screw the price..
That would probably lose power..lol. I just wonder which one will come out first... The AEM they said is another 4-8 weeks before it reaches production, the Injen is another 2-3 weeks.. I wonder... Whichever one comes out first i'm getting it, screw the price..
#47
why hasnt anyone addressed the ecu ISSUE. I thought we had to reprogram the damn thing to get any mods. Countless people have said this, and this is the supposed reason takao got a loss in HP from the titanium exhaust.
SO WHICH IS IT?
1) the ecu must be programmed to accept performance mods
2) the $3k titanium exhaust was designed so badly it just lost power
3) all exhausts may lose power with this car
SO WHICH IS IT?
1) the ecu must be programmed to accept performance mods
2) the $3k titanium exhaust was designed so badly it just lost power
3) all exhausts may lose power with this car
#49
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Zmeflyby
has anyone seen the intake from nismo?
i really wanna know the power gain....
has anyone seen the intake from nismo?
i really wanna know the power gain....
#51
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by knihc2008
all i can say is that that intake sounds hot.
but that horsepower gain doesn't seem too impressive. i'll wait.
all i can say is that that intake sounds hot.
but that horsepower gain doesn't seem too impressive. i'll wait.
#52
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Miaim, FL
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm sorry, but those dyno number suck. Before the intake, they got 228.8 hp at the wheels. Assuming a 15% drivetrain loss(the normal for a manual), the car only has 269 hp at the flywheel. After the intake, the car has 232.8 hp at the wheels. Again, assuming the same 15% drivetrain loss, that translates to 274 hp at the flywheel. Don't those numbers seem a bit low? I guess the only good thing is that the run was consistent and showed a gain when every other factor remained the same. I also read the small print under the dyno run, and it said it was run in 3rd gear, which is the 1:1 gear for all manual cars(usually), so that was an accurate dyno run.
#53
Registered User
Originally posted by JJH
I also read the small print under the dyno run, and it said it was run in 3rd gear, which is the 1:1 gear for all manual cars(usually), so that was an accurate dyno run.
I also read the small print under the dyno run, and it said it was run in 3rd gear, which is the 1:1 gear for all manual cars(usually), so that was an accurate dyno run.
#54
Originally posted by z461
Remember, 8 HP @ the wheels translates to more @ the flywheel..
Remember, 8 HP @ the wheels translates to more @ the flywheel..
#55
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by roberto350z
so since there is 8hp going to the flywheel, we have 8hp*85%=6.8hp gain to the wheels. I think the fact that your wallet is so much lighter will make the car go faster more than the increased flow.
so since there is 8hp going to the flywheel, we have 8hp*85%=6.8hp gain to the wheels. I think the fact that your wallet is so much lighter will make the car go faster more than the increased flow.
#56
Registered User
Originally posted by JJH
I'm sorry, but those dyno number suck. Before the intake, they got 228.8 hp at the wheels. Assuming a 15% drivetrain loss(the normal for a manual), the car only has 269 hp at the flywheel. After the intake, the car has 232.8 hp at the wheels. Again, assuming the same 15% drivetrain loss, that translates to 274 hp at the flywheel. Don't those numbers seem a bit low? I guess the only good thing is that the run was consistent and showed a gain when every other factor remained the same. I also read the small print under the dyno run, and it said it was run in 3rd gear, which is the 1:1 gear for all manual cars(usually), so that was an accurate dyno run.
I'm sorry, but those dyno number suck. Before the intake, they got 228.8 hp at the wheels. Assuming a 15% drivetrain loss(the normal for a manual), the car only has 269 hp at the flywheel. After the intake, the car has 232.8 hp at the wheels. Again, assuming the same 15% drivetrain loss, that translates to 274 hp at the flywheel. Don't those numbers seem a bit low? I guess the only good thing is that the run was consistent and showed a gain when every other factor remained the same. I also read the small print under the dyno run, and it said it was run in 3rd gear, which is the 1:1 gear for all manual cars(usually), so that was an accurate dyno run.
#57
Registered User
Originally posted by roberto350z
why hasnt anyone addressed the ecu ISSUE. I thought we had to reprogram the damn thing to get any mods. Countless people have said this, and this is the supposed reason takao got a loss in HP from the titanium exhaust.
SO WHICH IS IT?
1) the ecu must be programmed to accept performance mods
2) the $3k titanium exhaust was designed so badly it just lost power
3) all exhausts may lose power with this car
why hasnt anyone addressed the ecu ISSUE. I thought we had to reprogram the damn thing to get any mods. Countless people have said this, and this is the supposed reason takao got a loss in HP from the titanium exhaust.
SO WHICH IS IT?
1) the ecu must be programmed to accept performance mods
2) the $3k titanium exhaust was designed so badly it just lost power
3) all exhausts may lose power with this car
#58
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Copacabana, Rio de Janeiro BR
Posts: 1,721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I already have the jim wolf pop charger.
will the cold air injector work with that or do I also have to get theres?
does this make sense?
I LOVE THIS FREAKIN CAR!
will the cold air injector work with that or do I also have to get theres?
does this make sense?
I LOVE THIS FREAKIN CAR!
#59
Veteran
iTrader: (2)
n2o... what a great modification, I wish I could get 50-70hp for about 8seconds. the rest of the time you just added 50lbs to your car.
if you plan forced induction, skip the intake, they come with their own. but exhaust is required to accept all the extra exhaust gas from the extra power.
Im not sure if Ill get an intake, but not because 7hp isnt worth 300$ or so. if you think thats not worth it, you are sorely misinformed. there is no big horsepower gain for cheap, these are the most basic and fundamental mods that are always considered first.
if you plan forced induction, skip the intake, they come with their own. but exhaust is required to accept all the extra exhaust gas from the extra power.
Im not sure if Ill get an intake, but not because 7hp isnt worth 300$ or so. if you think thats not worth it, you are sorely misinformed. there is no big horsepower gain for cheap, these are the most basic and fundamental mods that are always considered first.
#60
Registered User
Originally posted by Zmeflyby
has anyone seen the intake from nismo?
i really wanna know the power gain....
has anyone seen the intake from nismo?
i really wanna know the power gain....