![]() |
Any pricing?
I wonder why Top Secret's pipe is a ~45 degree Y whereas these are more like an ~80 degree shape. I suppose we still shouldn't buy since Y-pipes are making the Z run reeeal lean. |
who cares? these won't make any considerable power over stock. stock is already a good enough design. unless of course what you're looking for is to waste money. the whole stock exhaust system after the headers is already great, and about the best stock exhaust system out there. fully mandrel bent ss, you can't do much better than that.
|
Originally posted by VQracer I care, many people here care. How do you know they won't make a considerable amount of power over stock? have you dynoed it? How do you know the stock exhaust is already great? Are you some kind of engineer? Victor |
Originally posted by 350z_taquito who cares? these won't make any considerable power over stock. stock is already a good enough design. unless of course what you're looking for is to waste money. the whole stock exhaust system after the headers is already great, and about the best stock exhaust system out there. fully mandrel bent ss, you can't do much better than that. ummm....im sure there will some difference considering the stock pipes are pretty small and restricted. :rolleyes: |
Daytona: can you say more about Y pipes making the 350 run lean? I've not seen that mentioned here before. Thanks
A friend is making several Y-pipes and we plan to dyno next week. I'll keep the one that shows the most improvement. |
Originally posted by 350z_taquito who cares? these won't make any considerable power over stock. stock is already a good enough design. unless of course what you're looking for is to waste money. the whole stock exhaust system after the headers is already great, and about the best stock exhaust system out there. fully mandrel bent ss, you can't do much better than that. |
Originally posted by krinkov Im not sure what your basing this on. Granted there have been only mixed results with the few replacments muffler sections available, there have not been enough commercialy available full cat backs around to determine the real efficency of the stock cat back. Keep in mind that the Z is still relativly brand new and there is ALWAYS room for improvment over stock with proper design. ;) |
heh, about a week:p Ive been keeping them fresh weekly lately, think I'll start a contest to see who can identify the most obscure quotes:D
|
a) i cant wait until mine's releases a total car project. so cool.
b) there is always room for improvement, but remember than with an NA motor you dont want a 4inch pipe like a turbo. NA motors benefit from a little back pressure. c)i want to know what daytona is talking about the y pipe making the z run lean, too. anyone care to drop some knowledge? |
The idea I have as to why the Y-pipe would make the car run lean is if it eliminates the cats so the O2 sensors are not getting the correct info. A similar thing happened on my 240SX when I removed the close-coupled cat except that the car ran richer than stock. If this is the case, O2 simulators should cure this problem.
|
Originally posted by Zmeflyby ummm....im sure there will some difference considering the stock pipes are pretty small and restricted. :rolleyes: |
The Y-pipes posted by VQ both have the catconvert still in place.
They even keep the flex-pipes. So I guess running lean would not result from either of those mods. |
I could be wrong but I think they're resonators, not cats in the pics above.
|
Originally posted by 350z_taquito . the im design leaves the forward cylinders suspectible to leaning out. What is "im"? |
My guess would be intake mainfold and the theory could be correct in extreme applications IMO.
|
I think you're right apsilon. The cat is upstream from the Y pipe.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:17 PM. |
© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands