|
Best Motoring Nismo 370z vs Spec C vs Evo vs NSX-R vs Tom's IS-F
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GCRwKv4qQ5k
Nismo 370z 355ps Spec C Evo (Ralliart springs, intake, and exhaust) 300 PS Tom's IS-F (suspension) 420ps NSX-R 280ps Was disappointed in the Z considering how much lighter it is compared to the STi and the Evo. |
Just watched that yesterday - the Nismo doesn't even show up for this one :gotowned:
|
Originally Posted by nismolife
(Post 7844241)
Just watched that yesterday - the Nismo doesn't even show up for this one :gotowned:
|
Originally Posted by poopking12
(Post 7844268)
Huh? the first car they even show is the Nismo...:icon14:
|
Originally Posted by nismolife
(Post 7844343)
Sorry - I meant the Nismo didn't make a good showing in the race - it wasn't very competitive. It looked like he had to catch it alot in the corners...
|
what the hell are you idiots talking about?
(rolls eyes) |
Originally Posted by NISMO_558
(Post 7844442)
It's actually been found that NISMO 370z's dont like to stick to the track as well as they're supposed to.
|
Tires are important:
370Z - 19" Bridgestone RE050 Evo - 18" Advan AD08 IS-F - 19" Bridgestone RE11 NSX-R - 17" Bridgestone RE070 |
nismo 370.
big fan of the z. but the 370. could have been better. it seem so much of the drivers fault. but the car highly overrated. i think nissan should have took it back and F.I. the Z again.. end of story...
come on nissan |
Originally Posted by juelz86z3303
(Post 7844684)
big fan of the z. but the 370. could have been better. it seem so much of the drivers fault. but the car highly overrated. i think nissan should have took it back and F.I. the Z again.. end of story...
come on nissan |
Originally Posted by scotts300
(Post 7844624)
Tires are important:
370Z - 19" Bridgestone RE050 Evo - 18" Advan AD08 IS-F - 19" Bridgestone RE11 NSX-R - 17" Bridgestone RE070 |
Originally Posted by Nexx
(Post 7844600)
its sucks. heard it only ran .2 faster than the 350z nismo around tsukuba.
|
Originally Posted by juelz86z3303
(Post 7844684)
big fan of the z. but the 370. could have been better. it seem so much of the drivers fault. but the car highly overrated. i think nissan should have took it back and F.I. the Z again.. end of story...
come on nissan |
most of you take BM's races way too seriously..
i remember when they ran a 135i vs e92 and they "coincidentally" both ran 13.3 in the quarter mile.. what they were trying to convey is that the germans made their flagship m series as slow as their entry-level sports coupe. BUT we all know the e92 runs faster than 13.3 and the 135i slightly slower than 13.3. This is an example of their biased reviews.. nonetheless they make some interesting videos to watch.. |
Originally Posted by Motormouth
(Post 7844576)
what the hell are you idiots talking about?
(rolls eyes) |
Originally Posted by poopking12
(Post 7844766)
What the hell are you talking about? :rolleyes: <-- learn to use smilies
|
Evo FTW:thumbup:
|
Originally Posted by Nexx
(Post 7844600)
its sucks. heard it only ran .2 faster than the 350z nismo around tsukuba.
|
The 370 looked pretty pathetic in that vid.
|
Originally Posted by sno
(Post 7846465)
The 370 looked pretty pathetic in that vid.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:38 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands