03 350z dyno tune
#21
New Member
Thread Starter
Ok going to take back to the tuner from what I've read and other comments the 4pulls the ended up with 266 rwhp seemed MEH. I'm not concerned with the peak number (280 would still be nice) but rather the gain. To my knowledge the timing wasn't messed with and the A/F ratio was dialed in at 12.5/12.6. HOWEVER. LOL there will be two things im adding (ART test pipes and ported throttle body) from you all experience what is the best A/F for power AND should the timing be advanced for more power? Some say 12-12.1 others say 13. 13.2 looking at the graph looks like the top end was already close to 12.5 hence the only 3 hp gained, but the low end midrange was Lean and picked up about 10-12 in that area. Don't get me wrong car runs great BUT for 700.00 bucks I expected more.
#22
Registered User
You will not make 280whp unless you run Longtubes Headers and cams along with your other mods. I'm sorry if u feel that you deserve more power, The DE is not very responsive to NA mods on average you will make 260whp/250tq with full boltons. You bought the wrong car. The HR would get you the numbers you are hoping for.
#23
Registered User
Also running a high AFR like 13.1 will give you a little more power, but you will be tuned on the ragged edge with more chance of knock/detonation hurting your motor if it's too hot or if you get a bad batch of gas. I wouldn't advise doing that and tune more safely for reliably and settle for ok numbers with a safe afr of 12.8 but that is for you to decide for ur car.
#24
New Member
Thread Starter
Also running a high AFR like 13.1 will give you a little more power, but you will be tuned on the ragged edge with more chance of knock/detonation hurting your motor if it's too hot or if you get a bad batch of gas. I wouldn't advise doing that and tune more safely for reliably and settle for ok numbers with a safe afr of 12.8 but that is for you to decide for ur car.
#25
New Member
Thread Starter
You will not make 280whp unless you run Longtubes Headers and cams along with your other mods. I'm sorry if u feel that you deserve more power, The DE is not very responsive to NA mods on average you will make 260whp/250tq with full boltons. You bought the wrong car. The HR would get you the numbers you are hoping for.
1. MD shock wave
2. MD ART PIPE
3. Ported 5mm OEM TB
4. Ported upper OEM plenum (shift tech performance)
The following users liked this post:
BluestreamDE (04-04-2018)
#29
New Member
Thread Starter
Yea I actually didn’t tell them to put at a specific AFR I think It dumb luck/coincidence. The car actually made 281 untouched from last tune with 12.5 AFR. The parts I installed obviously added more air and leaned it out nearly perfect. All he did was was smooth out the top/midrange curve and ended with A leaner tune 282.7 (lets just say 283 lol). He could have probably leaned out bit more but sisne I’m thinking about admin tuning 3.5 intake I just left it at that. 17-18 rwhp gain was a surprise so very very happy there.
THOUGHTS on the 3.5 air intake ?? Look like to me theDE
needs more air coming in. He claims 12-16 but we all know the advertising BS.
THOUGHTS on the 3.5 air intake ?? Look like to me theDE
needs more air coming in. He claims 12-16 but we all know the advertising BS.
#30
New Member
iTrader: (1)
There is a thread that explains people who run 3.5” intake and 3.5” TB units see no to negative gain on NA.
The only
Ones who benefit is the FI guys because it allows more volume under force. Where NA DE’s don’t have anything left to utilize over sized intakes and throttle bodies.
IIRC it’s in the drivetrain forum. It was active like last week lots of good info in there.
The only
Ones who benefit is the FI guys because it allows more volume under force. Where NA DE’s don’t have anything left to utilize over sized intakes and throttle bodies.
IIRC it’s in the drivetrain forum. It was active like last week lots of good info in there.
#31
New Member
Thread Starter
Dam so may actually loose power huh. The guy I purchased the ported upper intake didn’t think there would be double digit increase if any. So it’s good to hear another opinion. I suppose the bottom line is all cars seem to respond differently to the same bolt on. There is another post on here and he said that same intake actually gained 12 rwhp I’ll have to search and verify year. I was thinking about adding another tune BUT for race fuel eieher 100 or 104 octane.
Anyone think it’s worth it for possible gain? we have a gas station in seguin tx that actually has 100 oct at the pump. Cheaper than the track 7.99 a gallon. WORTH A TUNE?
Anyone think it’s worth it for possible gain? we have a gas station in seguin tx that actually has 100 oct at the pump. Cheaper than the track 7.99 a gallon. WORTH A TUNE?
#32
New Member
iTrader: (1)
Lots of people say lots of things to justify stuff. People have said their autozone intakes have gained them 30hp but have never touched a dyno.
And race gas isn’t going to make the intake better or worse for power. It’s going to allow you to advance more timing on the engine and avoid detonation with added power.
And race gas isn’t going to make the intake better or worse for power. It’s going to allow you to advance more timing on the engine and avoid detonation with added power.
#33
New Member
Thread Starter
No I get the intake opinions, to clarify I meant do y’all think making an additional tune be worth and see a Gain for 100-104 octane? I’m extremely happy and surprised at my current power level, I’ve literally done all the possible bolt ons with the exception of cams , my tuner charges 200.00 an hour and takes less than an hour. So this is where I’m at get the intake for “possibly” more power but that HAS to be tuned due to the larger MAF housing intergraded into the intake. 330+200=530.00 Without certainty of, if any gains. OR just spend 50.00 in 100 octane + 200 for another tune. I’m assuming for certain there would be SOME gains with advancing timing etc.
#35
New Member
iTrader: (1)
Stance and exhaust flame tunes are very popular as well. Doesn’t equate to gains because people do it.
And why wouldn’t FI need it? If anything that’s the biggest gain. Again you’re allowing more volume to be delivered to the motor and adding less restriction to the turbos intake flow. If you believe FI won’t benefit or doesn’t need it. Then you can’t believe NA would.
That’s like saying blowing through a stray isn’t any better than blowing through a pipe. It would work for sucking to simulate NA but NA isn’t nearly as powerful as FI.
That said, I second the race gas is useless with out oxygen. Also you need to make some good power and lots of timing to need race gas.
And why wouldn’t FI need it? If anything that’s the biggest gain. Again you’re allowing more volume to be delivered to the motor and adding less restriction to the turbos intake flow. If you believe FI won’t benefit or doesn’t need it. Then you can’t believe NA would.
That’s like saying blowing through a stray isn’t any better than blowing through a pipe. It would work for sucking to simulate NA but NA isn’t nearly as powerful as FI.
That said, I second the race gas is useless with out oxygen. Also you need to make some good power and lots of timing to need race gas.
Last edited by CK_32; 04-05-2018 at 04:55 PM.
#37
New Member
iTrader: (11)
On the topic of bigger intakes just look at Sasha's build, his stuff was in magazines and not fictional... Everything he did to open it up made more power, that pretty much said everything you need to know about the intake track on these engines. He was using a 90mm tb before swapping to ITBs and to this date has one of the highest HP and fastest NA 350Zs documented.
#38
350Z-holic
iTrader: (13)
what CK said, the additional power/torque comes from advancing your timing ... if the actual fuel mix isnt what it's tuned for things will go south quickly ... and at 6500rpm, things go bad quickly...
If it was me, I'd go fill up on 87 octane and get retuned knowing you'll be running 93 ... if your tune is good at 87, it'll be fine at 93.
is it sexy? not at all, but it's safe. And in reality your 283whp is at ~6500rpm, how often are you at that engine speed?
Your car...your call, just my 2cents
#39
New Member
iTrader: (1)
On the topic of bigger intakes just look at Sasha's build, his stuff was in magazines and not fictional... Everything he did to open it up made more power, that pretty much said everything you need to know about the intake track on these engines. He was using a 90mm tb before swapping to ITBs and to this date has one of the highest HP and fastest NA 350Zs documented.
Normal cars like the OP have had people buy the 3.5” TB or larger ones have showed their before and after dynos and usually gain minimal to literally 0 HP.
NA is limited by just that. NA, it can only suck so much. Even less as the car ages and parts wear to lose that vacuum. If the 3” TB isn’t a major restriction then going to a 90mm won’t do anything. Because it’s not a restriction at Stock/NA values.
And just like an actual vacuum if you have a 2” stretch hose on it it increases the velocity. If you add a 8” stretch hose it loses all vacuum pressure thus sucking in a higher volume, but at less pressure and velocity. Ie losing air mass being forced in. Aka what a turbo does on its own to a mass degree. Which is why the bigger TB is optimal for it.
It’s more than just air volume. Which is why some people lose power with ITB’s on some cars. Just like Sasha’s when he played with 100 different types of trumpet designs. Some lost the velocity flow by being bigger, smaller, longer, shorter, different shape. You need to maximize both vacuum and velocity with NA engines. Not just one or the other. Which is why it’s so hard to make NA engines HP pigs.
As for the standard kit tubing being 3”.. That’s because it’s usually built for stock applications being a 3” ish TB. Custom kits with built motors and large TB’s usually run 4” or larger intake piping and exhaust piping to maximize flow. But as you hinted at earlier FI isn’t as touchy as NA with velocity/volume because most turbos can put out 2x the flow to feed the HP. Hardly ever do people max out turbos and when they do it’s easier just to get a bigger turbo to force the air down the smaller less optimized standard piping.
Again which is why most race teams run massive turbos and much larger piping than normal guys like us who has street rigs that are limited by the block not the volume or air being delivered. FI is still subject to volume, velocity and pressure but much less than a NA motor being limited to just the vacuum pressure to deliver air in.