Why staggered tires if wheels are not staggered??
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: new orleans
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why staggered tires if wheels are not staggered??
I just thought about something... why is it that the 03-05 18" wheels have staggared tires on them when the wheels are the exact same width? I know the 06 rims are 18x8 and 18x8.5 and most people who have custom rims like 19 inch have 19x8.5 and 19x9.5... so why when all four of the stock wheels from 03-05 are 18x8 would you need 225/45/18 front and 245/45/18 rear? Reason being I am replacing tires on some 18s I have and Im thinking of just going with 225/45/18 all the way around... I think it looks better...
#2
New Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Jersey, New
Posts: 7,146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
225/45/18? thats too skinny and short. If you want nice handling, especially on a RWD car, go for something like 255/265, which the Z likes a lot. Im at 245/275 and i mildly understeer. If you want the stretched look, get bigger wheels.
#7
Sponsor
IOS Performance
IOS Performance
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by soshiv
I just thought about something... why is it that the 03-05 18" wheels have staggared tires on them when the wheels are the exact same width? I know the 06 rims are 18x8 and 18x8.5 and most people who have custom rims like 19 inch have 19x8.5 and 19x9.5... so why when all four of the stock wheels from 03-05 are 18x8 would you need 225/45/18 front and 245/45/18 rear? Reason being I am replacing tires on some 18s I have and Im thinking of just going with 225/45/18 all the way around... I think it looks better...
I think it looks worse, but it would probably handle better as Nissan dials in understeer so you don't swap ends all the time (lower insurance).
Trending Topics
#8
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Originally Posted by soshiv
2003 silvertone touring
If you want you can have wider tires in the rear.
Or wider tires in the front.
Or the same width all around.
But keep in mind that VDC is very particular about overall tire height.
#9
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Hood Canal, WA.
Posts: 3,595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I just got an extra set of wheels for winter tires for my '06 Z. The tags on them say 2003-2005 350Z 17" and 2 are 7.5 " wide and 2 are 8.0 " wide. So is it true the 2003-2005 track and touring have 18" 8.0 all around?
Thanks davidv. That was a very helpful post.
Thanks davidv. That was a very helpful post.
Last edited by I1DER; 01-26-2007 at 03:48 PM.
#10
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Originally Posted by I1DER
So is it true the 2003-2005 track and touring have 18" 8.0 all around?
#19
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: DeLand, Florida
Posts: 1,844
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Theres more to grip than just the width of tire. On a rear drive car with approx 50/50 weight distribution you will see almost even tire heating on a track, and a bit more rear heating for street driving (less aggressive cornering and more aggressive straight line). The tires being staggered helps balance the grip and tire wear accordingly so all 4 wear at approx the same rate. The shape, slip angle and "track" of the tire's contact patch are the other affected things (other than the rate at which the tire can cool and thus its temperature). A wider tire patch is more conductive to preventing sliding, so a wider rear patch will be benefitial to dialing out oversteer, a narrower front to dialing in understeer. Slip angle is something I'm still trying to learn on.
For what its worth I would run at least a 235 front. Stock cars come with room to add a set of snow chains *usually* and it appears that way on the Z as well (although I would never try it). There will usually be about 15mm of space from the face of the wheel to the fender (sometimes much more) and about 1" or more gap from the top of the tire to the bottom of the fender. A spacer all around plus some wider tires would increase track and improve cornering (but could also have negative impacts on braking).
In short there isn't a specific answer -> partially for tire wear, partially for dialing out oversteer, and partially asthetics.
FWIW I'm coming from BMW's and in 1995 the M3 had 235/40/R17 all around, in 1996 they decided to switch to a 225/245 staggered setup for no disclosed reason, the cars handled much much worse, but most drivers wouldn't notice....and they were harder to spin.
For what its worth I would run at least a 235 front. Stock cars come with room to add a set of snow chains *usually* and it appears that way on the Z as well (although I would never try it). There will usually be about 15mm of space from the face of the wheel to the fender (sometimes much more) and about 1" or more gap from the top of the tire to the bottom of the fender. A spacer all around plus some wider tires would increase track and improve cornering (but could also have negative impacts on braking).
In short there isn't a specific answer -> partially for tire wear, partially for dialing out oversteer, and partially asthetics.
FWIW I'm coming from BMW's and in 1995 the M3 had 235/40/R17 all around, in 1996 they decided to switch to a 225/245 staggered setup for no disclosed reason, the cars handled much much worse, but most drivers wouldn't notice....and they were harder to spin.
#20
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Considering the tire issue the early Z have had, I think it's safe to assume that tire wear wasn't very high on the list whent they designed it.
The "official" reason (read Marketing) for staggered setup was to help put the power down on corner exit.
An other important reason is good old styling. Staggered setup look faster...
The "official" reason (read Marketing) for staggered setup was to help put the power down on corner exit.
An other important reason is good old styling. Staggered setup look faster...