MY350Z.COM - Nissan 350Z and 370Z Forum Discussion

MY350Z.COM - Nissan 350Z and 370Z Forum Discussion (https://my350z.com/forum/)
-   Wheels & Tires (https://my350z.com/forum/wheels-and-tires-60/)
-   -   What's the ideal tire/wheel size for a Z? (https://my350z.com/forum/wheels-and-tires/351840-whats-the-ideal-tire-wheel-size-for-a-z.html)

nyguy4u Apr 14, 2008 01:29 PM

What's the ideal tire/wheel size for a Z?
 
Hi guys, so I just picked up my 04' Touring, and now I want to get some rims. I was looking at Tirerack.com, but notice that their tire/wheel packages all come with the same size for all 4, and looking at other members here, they keep their back wheels wider than their front, which is what I want.

I want to get 19's, and I was wondering what the favored size and offsets were for 19" wheels. Would 19x10.5 Rear, 19x9.5 Front work?

Any information would be greatly appreciated.

nyguy4u Apr 14, 2008 01:43 PM

yes, that's it?

umm, no.. don't close the thread. Why close the thread? Isn't the Wheels & Tires forum the correct forum to post a Wheel & Tire question?

I'm asking for some ideas, no need to be an arrogant ass. Id like the advantages and drawbacks, and some offset ideas (I'm not too familiar with offsets)

Tac-M Apr 14, 2008 01:53 PM

man... lake george... nice !

the 19x9.5 and 19x10.5 +22 offset 245/35/19 front 275/35/19 rear are the most common setup for a z car.

oh and one more thing get rays/volks - or go home.

nyguy4u Apr 14, 2008 01:56 PM

thanks for the reply Tac.

When you say +22 offset, that's for both front and rear?

Your familiar with Lake George?

Tac-M Apr 14, 2008 02:04 PM

1 Attachment(s)
^ i have been there once or twice. will be back soon for a few days.

yes +22 is for all 4.


Chris from http://www.f1motorsports.com/ got me set with mine twice.

SS728 Apr 14, 2008 03:58 PM

8.5/9.5F
9.5/10.5R

245F
275/285R

Between +15 and +20 offset (F & R)

Spike100 Apr 14, 2008 04:19 PM

^^ :+1: Nicely stated... compact (but clear) posting that provides the facts.

--Spike

cavallino33 Apr 14, 2008 04:25 PM

I went with the same width all around but different aspects.
275/35 front 275/40 rear, a non staggered setup makes the car handles better. Both are on 18x9.5 +15 enkei rpf1's.

In hindsight I would have gone with a slightly less aggressive offset in front so that the edge would be just flush instead of very slightly outside the fender. Back looks perfect though IMO.

Spike100 Apr 14, 2008 05:00 PM

^^ I went with a more conservative setup, keeping the same widths (245 front and rear) but a staggered overall diameter (aspect ratio 40 front on and 45 rear on 18”s) to keep within VDC guidelines. As you point out, the same widths front and rear provide more neutral handling.

Question: Do you experience any “bump steer” with 275’s on the front?

--Spike

cavallino33 Apr 14, 2008 05:37 PM


Originally Posted by Spike100

Question: Do you experience any “bump steer” with 275’s on the front?

--Spike

Nope nothing out of the ordinary. I haven't really found any negatives to the setup yet.

Spike100 Apr 14, 2008 07:53 PM

^^ Thanks for the reply.

AVmagneticZ Apr 14, 2008 08:06 PM

if u want 9.5f 10.5r go with +22 all around thats the most common and for best look the toyo t1r 255/285 if u want a bit more of a stretch on the rear but still looks good just less tire get the 275 on the rear. but 255 toyos on the 9.5" wide rim look perfect.
u gotta keep in mind that some tire brands are wider then others. the t1r's are skinnier width wise then most other tires. and like the michelin ps2's being one of the widest. but were talkin by like 4 mm here. not to crazy

Tac-M Apr 15, 2008 10:43 AM


Originally Posted by AVmagneticZ
u gotta keep in mind that some tire brands are wider then others.



i had to roll my fenders with advan sports at 275..... totally worth it though :D

bmaiZ Apr 15, 2008 11:12 AM

245/35 front
275/35 rear

offset +22 all.

blazed54 Apr 15, 2008 02:33 PM


Originally Posted by cavallino33
I went with the same width all around but different aspects.
275/35 front 275/40 rear, a non staggered setup makes the car handles better. Both are on 18x9.5 +15 enkei rpf1's.

In hindsight I would have gone with a slightly less aggressive offset in front so that the edge would be just flush instead of very slightly outside the fender. Back looks perfect though IMO.


I had no idea that non staggered setup meant better, more neutral handling. if that's the case, is there any benefit to going 9.5 f and 10.5 rear other than looks?

cavallino33 Apr 15, 2008 03:50 PM


Originally Posted by blazed54
I had no idea that non staggered setup meant better, more neutral handling. if that's the case, is there any benefit to going 9.5 f and 10.5 rear other than looks?

On an otherwise stock car no.

I suppose there might be some setups with suspension power etc that might make a staggered setup appropriate.

SS728 Apr 15, 2008 04:08 PM

+22 is wimpy offset.

+15 all around for almost close to flush, +/- 2 offset.
With 8.5F and 9.5R of course.

Marino Z Apr 15, 2008 04:49 PM

I have 245 on 9.5 +22, it's bit stretched for my taste.
255/35/19 is better choice imo.

bimmertech Apr 15, 2008 05:03 PM

as you can see answers are all over the place and one persons "acceptable" may be total trash to you.

i have 18x9.5 +20 all around. a tad aggressive in the front(+22 would be perfect), and a tad on the conservative side in the rear(+12 or 15 would be perfect). i run 255/40/18 falken rt615's(wide running tire) all around, and will switch to 265/35/18's when these are done.

good luck with your search

Doh-Joe Apr 15, 2008 05:37 PM

What would be the recommended (or common) size for 19s with 12+ offset?


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:43 AM.


© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands