MY350Z.COM - Nissan 350Z and 370Z Forum Discussion

MY350Z.COM - Nissan 350Z and 370Z Forum Discussion (https://my350z.com/forum/)
-   2009+ 370Z (https://my350z.com/forum/2009-370z-504/)
-   -   Why does the 370z suck at 0-60? (https://my350z.com/forum/2009-370z/402204-why-does-the-370z-suck-at-0-60-a.html)

quietkilla6 12-02-2008 02:12 PM

if you want a better 0-60 go waist the other 20 30 40 50 grand on something faster...
the reason it "sux" to you is because you dont concider that performance cost money its not like someone just decides were going to make a 4 second 0-60. its research and development mpg always in mind.

C5_vette 12-02-2008 02:15 PM

LOL who cares about 0-60 LMAO

Z33 Track Pack 12-02-2008 03:03 PM

not really caring how much faster it is on the straight. I mean honestly guys if u want a really fast drag car, go get yourself a Evo or STI. But what most Z owner wants is a much better balanced ride especially cornering and stability. Not to mention, the much needed refinements on interior.

C5_vette 12-02-2008 03:07 PM

uuhhh evos and sti's corner very well.... if you want a fast straight line car, pick up and old F-body drop 3-5 grand in it and head to the track....

Silkfiveseven 12-02-2008 05:05 PM

its the driver not the car xD

Built2shredZ 12-02-2008 05:16 PM

The R&D 0-60 time of 5.1 seconds was taken in Japan way above sea level... They stated in the article that they think they could get around 4.9 time at sea level...

Also the 08-09 models is like 5.3-5.5 seconds depending on which magazine you read..

DevinB 12-02-2008 06:30 PM

I want one so bad. Cant wait for people to start modding them.

Nismo1182 12-02-2008 09:30 PM


Originally Posted by evil_tt (Post 6630302)
Its 80 pounds lighter and .2 liter bigger engine.....did you think it'd pull 0-60 in 4 seconds?

And a 3.69 final drive. The car should be 4.5 with a good driver mod. In the vid you can clearly see the car wheel hopping on the take off. FAIL.

DIGItonium 12-03-2008 05:23 AM

OP needs to appreciate the fact the Z accelerates faster than the speed at which Vista can boot up on a RAID 0 VelociRaptor setup. If that's not fast enough, let Chuck Norris drive your car. :icon17:

I think everything about the 370Z base is better than my '03 Enthusiast. I'm already content with my Z, so I don't think I can complain about a 370Z Base + Sport Package.

Donsred350Z 12-03-2008 08:54 AM

Quick car being a Sti or EVo times are about 5.0 -5.3 for the non mod Sti and 4.9-5.1 for the Evo non mod their strengthens are the cheap mods. We all wanted a car as quick as a Evo 0-60 now we have one thats probably faster and classier in that it looks like a Porsche (sorta). Not to mention better handling.

What are you guys bitching about??? The only thing these other cars have on us now is AWD and winter time better driving control.


The 370Z Rocks!!

bboypuertoroc 12-03-2008 09:07 AM

wat

C5_vette 12-03-2008 09:09 AM


Originally Posted by bboypuertoroc (Post 6634614)
wat

+1 LOL

redline06 12-03-2008 09:52 AM

^^+12 lol i didnt even know what i was reading anymore

SBG 12-03-2008 02:34 PM


Originally Posted by S8ER95Z (Post 6629571)
These times are published by sources that have proven time and time again that they are no where near talented.

Case in point? These same magazines have times posted for my car ranging from 13.7 to 14.0 in the 1/4 mile.

My car was 100% bone stock at the time and my first pass ever was at 3200DA and I ran a 13.4 @ 105mph on a 2.1 60ft... when I got the chance to run in good weather (-303ft DA) I went 13.1 @ 108mph on a 2.1 60ft. Then the Fiancee ran the car at 127ft DA and went 13.1 @ 105mph on a 1.99 60ft.

We are not even close to the talented drivers who hold records and I consider myself to be an average joe. These magazine times are good for getting an idea of what the car will do but they are no where near what the car is actually capable of.

Furthermore...reading that article you will see this... "3.5-liter Nismo 350Z we tested in 2007, which ran 4.9 and 13.5 at 103.9"... compare that to several members on this site...

1. Pat Bateman ---------------------07 Base 6spd 13.150@107.62mph 2.027 60ft
2. Veetec --------------------------07 Base 6spd 13.157@105.32mph 1.938 60ft
3. Peak350 -------------------------07 Enth 6spd 13.239@105.67mph 1.923 60ft


Just looking at those results and seeing other people posting up 4 tenths quicker... hmmm.. if that same mag runs 13.3 and someone on here can knock off 4 tenths..you are looking at least 13 flat (and sub 4.5 0-60 times).... who is to say this one won't have even more in it than the last one?




I do agree that many 370z owners will run times faster than the Magazines. That's the case with all cars (GTO's, Vettes, STi's, EVOs, etc). Just go to the drag racing section of one of their forums and you'll see times .3-.5 tenths faster than the Magazine tests.
I know over at LS2GTO.com they have a long list of guys that have run 12.9s in stock GTOs, but those times are not representative of what the "Average Joe" runs in a stock GTO.

And the same can be said for the upcoming 370z. For every 370z owner that pulls a 12.9, there will be dozens of other guys running mid 13s (just like the Magazine times).

So the Magazine times (especially Motortrend and Car and driver which usually produced very good times out of their testing) do represent what the car runs (on average).






To prove my point just look at the 1/4 mile times from this forum. By the time you get to number 10, you're already looking at 13.6s.

10. jdifolco -----------------------07 Tour 6spd 13.644@104.68mph 2.201 60ft
11. DomZ ---------------------------03 Tour Auto 13.667@101.57mph 1.996 60ft
12. pistols07Z ---------------------07 Base 6spd 13.675@102.31mph 2.150 60ft
13. BriGuyMax ----------------------03 Tour 6spd 13.688@102.77mph 2.091 60ft
14. Specv_USMC ---------------------07 Base 6spd 13.711@102.88mph 2.163 60ft
15. 350zshopper --------------------07 Tour 6spd 13.733@103.22mph

0jiggy0 12-03-2008 02:42 PM

[QUOTE=DIGItonium;6633563]OP needs to appreciate the fact the Z accelerates faster than the speed at which Vista can boot up on a RAID 0 VelociRaptor setup. If that's not fast enough, let Chuck Norris drive your car. :icon17:

QUOTE]

That was the nerdiest **** ive ever seen in my life :icon14:

hellsoldiers08 12-03-2008 10:23 PM

i kinda like the 370z. i think what they should of done is a 350z awd 3.7 liter

hellsoldiers08 12-03-2008 10:30 PM

if i could have the interior of the 370z and transmission i would be in heaven. :)

Endgame 12-04-2008 04:24 AM


Originally Posted by Built2shredZ (Post 6631767)
The R&D 0-60 time of 5.1 seconds was taken in Japan way above sea level... They stated in the article that they think they could get around 4.9 time at sea level...

Also the 08-09 models is like 5.3-5.5 seconds depending on which magazine you read..

No... They did not say 4.9 would be the time they said "sub 5 seconds' I think. That could be anything from 4.9 down to 4.6!!

We will see. Not like we will all be doing a ballz out 0-60 run every time we stop.... maybe....

For what it is, I am more than satisfied with this Z. I was really satisfied driving the 09 Maxima despite what the critics say. In this case, the critics really like the Z so I am sure I will LOVE the Z; maybe even more than my wife and two baby girls!!! ;)

S8ER95Z 12-04-2008 06:27 AM


Originally Posted by SBG (Post 6636310)
I do agree that many 370z owners will run times faster than the Magazines. That's the case with all cars (GTO's, Vettes, STi's, EVOs, etc). Just go to the drag racing section of one of their forums and you'll see times .3-.5 tenths faster than the Magazine tests.
I know over at LS2GTO.com they have a long list of guys that have run 12.9s in stock GTOs, but those times are not representative of what the "Average Joe" runs in a stock GTO.

And the same can be said for the upcoming 370z. For every 370z owner that pulls a 12.9, there will be dozens of other guys running mid 13s (just like the Magazine times).

So the Magazine times (especially Motortrend and Car and driver which usually produced very good times out of their testing) do represent what the car runs (on average).






To prove my point just look at the 1/4 mile times from this forum. By the time you get to number 10, you're already looking at 13.6s.

10. jdifolco -----------------------07 Tour 6spd 13.644@104.68mph 2.201 60ft
11. DomZ ---------------------------03 Tour Auto 13.667@101.57mph 1.996 60ft
12. pistols07Z ---------------------07 Base 6spd 13.675@102.31mph 2.150 60ft
13. BriGuyMax ----------------------03 Tour 6spd 13.688@102.77mph 2.091 60ft
14. Specv_USMC ---------------------07 Base 6spd 13.711@102.88mph 2.163 60ft
15. 350zshopper --------------------07 Tour 6spd 13.733@103.22mph

Well said, the average joe will probably match the magazine times or do slightly worse. The average joe isn't capable of extracting the full potential of the car anymore than the magazine drivers are in most cases. (always exceptions like Evan Smith) :cool::thumbup:

S8ER95Z 12-04-2008 06:27 AM


Originally Posted by C5_vette (Post 6630902)
LOL who cares about 0-60 LMAO

What is it with you LSx guys and your all trap speed no traction cars... :icon39:


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:25 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands