MY350Z.COM - Nissan 350Z and 370Z Forum Discussion

MY350Z.COM - Nissan 350Z and 370Z Forum Discussion (https://my350z.com/forum/)
-   Photography (https://my350z.com/forum/photography-478/)
-   -   Digital Camera Experts: Need advice (https://my350z.com/forum/photography/193050-digital-camera-experts-need-advice.html)

kbomb 05-23-2006 08:07 AM

Digital Camera Experts: Need advice
 
I hate to do these what should I get threads but I need advice on a specific digital camera.
They are only 50 dollars different. The newer model has more optical zoom but is it worth it.

Kodak V570:
http://www.kodak.com/eknec/PageQueri...equestid=23976

Kodak V610:
http://www.kodak.com/eknec/PageQueri...equestid=24088

TriX 05-23-2006 08:29 AM

www.dpreview.com

stu46 05-23-2006 08:41 AM

www.imaging-resource.com

out of the two, i'd get the 610

kbomb 05-23-2006 09:51 AM

Thanks guys. the reviews were helpful. Would you say the V610 is the same camera as the V570 except with more zoom power and other extras?
Or the V570 is for wide angle shots and the V610 is for more zooming shots?

wyzzz 05-23-2006 09:53 AM

cnet.com

stu46 05-23-2006 09:59 AM

V610
dual lens technology; 10X optical zoom
38–114 mm (35 mm equiv.) f/3.9–f/4.4
130–380 mm (35 mm equiv.) f/4.8

V570
23 mm–fixed (35 mm equiv.) f/2.8
39–117 mm (35 mm equiv.) f/3.9–f/4.4

In a point-and-shoot camera, I don't think the 15mm and f/2.8 is a huge advantage. On the long end, you get over triple the reach with the V610. You also get bluetooth and the extra 1.1MP, if that matters. The 570 does have the pano stitch mode, but that can be done in PS.

kbomb 05-23-2006 10:33 AM

Thanks Stu. I guess I'm just confused on some of the reviews.

So 38–114 mm (35 mm equiv.) f/3.9–f/4.4 is wider than 23 mm–fixed (35 mm equiv.) f/2.8 ?

stu46 05-23-2006 09:17 PM

The smaller the mm number, the wider field of view. think of it as a variable power telescope. on 1x, you can see a lot but nothing is magnafied. the higher the power(zoom), the closer you get to an object but you lose the field of view. hope this helps.

kbomb 05-24-2006 07:04 AM

ahh...thanks man. I was really confused about that part. Really appreciated it. I decided to get the V610 yesterday. Going to take pics of the car soon with the new mods.

stu46 05-24-2006 07:05 AM

cool. post up pics in the picture share sub-forum.

klouds 05-25-2006 12:36 AM

have you looked into other brands?

kbomb 05-25-2006 10:23 AM

Returning the kodak and going to get a canon sd700.
the quality of the Kodak was good in the day but at when there was no natural light out, the lcd and image was just not worth the money.
the looks and feel of it was really nice, but quality of image wasn't. just dissapointed with it.

stu46 05-25-2006 08:52 PM

The SD700IS is awesome. Just about a step shy of a dslr. My favorite P&S camera out at the moment.

GMZ 05-25-2006 08:57 PM

I prefer Canon over all others as far as P&S goes. When you step up to DSLR then Nikon gives some good competition with Pentax as a close 3rd. IMO anyway :D

klouds 05-25-2006 10:11 PM

i agree. i like canon. plus, some of them are really compact .. fits right in your purse/pocket.

kbomb 05-26-2006 05:00 AM

hey guys, I went and got the SD700! I should have went with Canon in the first place. It was a tough decision between this and the SD630. but the image stabilizer thing sold me. Tried moving my hand around and catch pics and it came out clear as can be...would of love it more if the screen was as big as the SD630.

I had the canon s400 and the quality of pics was 10x better than crappy Kodak V610.

350zroadster 05-26-2006 05:38 AM

You did the right thing by going with Canon rather than Kodak.

kbomb 05-26-2006 05:47 AM

anyone by any chance have a canon s400 batter charger?
type: Battery Charger CB-2LS

350zroadster 05-26-2006 05:56 AM

I have the S400 battery charger but it's "CB-2LV G".

kbomb 05-26-2006 06:06 AM

will that work? since we both have the same camera.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:55 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands