350Z Losing to Subaru WRX
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: manchester united
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
350Z Losing to Subaru WRX
On http://www.caranddriver.com/xp/Caranddriver/home.xml the 350Z is losing to the WRX in the polls for best bang for the buck.
Dodge Neon SRT-4 18.6%
Mustang Cobra SVT 19.4%
MazdaSpeed Protege 4.4%
350Z 26.8%
Subaru WRX 30.7%
Dodge Neon SRT-4 18.6%
Mustang Cobra SVT 19.4%
MazdaSpeed Protege 4.4%
350Z 26.8%
Subaru WRX 30.7%
#2
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Carolina
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bang for the buck? The WRX beats the 350Z hands down for VALUE. I purchased my Platinum silver 2002 WRX for about $23k, and it's more fun than a drunken frat party.
Dean
Dean
#4
Charter Member #34
Join Date: May 2002
Location: -
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Eric1h
at 36k I wouldnt say the Z is a great VALUE...a great car yes, worth the money, definetly, but not a great value
at 36k I wouldnt say the Z is a great VALUE...a great car yes, worth the money, definetly, but not a great value
m
Trending Topics
#8
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
wrx
The WRX is a Family Sedan, who cares about the bang for the buck, if that was the case, get a 97' metro, those are under 1k w/ 95 hp.
SILVERSTONE TRACK Z
SILVERSTONE TRACK Z
#9
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
reply to http://www.my350z.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=12208
reply to thread:
https://my350z.com/forum/showthread....threadid=12208
https://my350z.com/forum/showthread....threadid=12208
#11
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: norcal
Posts: 2,059
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 350Z Losing to Subaru WRX
Originally posted by SandMan
On http://www.caranddriver.com/xp/Caranddriver/home.xml the 350Z is losing to the WRX in the polls for best bang for the buck.
Dodge Neon SRT-4 18.6%
Mustang Cobra SVT 19.4%
MazdaSpeed Protege 4.4%
350Z 26.8%
Subaru WRX 30.7%
On http://www.caranddriver.com/xp/Caranddriver/home.xml the 350Z is losing to the WRX in the polls for best bang for the buck.
Dodge Neon SRT-4 18.6%
Mustang Cobra SVT 19.4%
MazdaSpeed Protege 4.4%
350Z 26.8%
Subaru WRX 30.7%
SO WHAT!!!
WRX
Last edited by ZON; 11-26-2002 at 08:14 PM.
#12
Charter Member #56
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Cincy
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
you guys are missing one important thing here - it's C&D doing the poll and they are the only ones I know that one month can say car X rules and the next knock it for everything they raved about it.
Secondly - it's obvious this poll has been spammed by message forums and that's why the WRX is winning. There's several well established WRX sites and a lot more WRX drivers out there. I still contest to this day the WRX is the most overpriced car in the auto industry.
Secondly - it's obvious this poll has been spammed by message forums and that's why the WRX is winning. There's several well established WRX sites and a lot more WRX drivers out there. I still contest to this day the WRX is the most overpriced car in the auto industry.
#13
Registered User
I saw that poll a while ago, but couldn't figure out how to respond. Every car on that list has a great Bang-for-the-Buck (BFB) depending on what you are looking for.
The Z is by far the cheapest true sports car. I think the only close competition is the S2000 for that category.
The WRX has great performance, all wheel drive, and is very utilitarian. For only 23K it is hard to beat that value.
The Mustang Cobra has the best performance of all the cars, but is also more expensive and feels older than some of the others.
The protege is in the low teens for cost, but handles great for what it is: a really inexpensive car that is actually fun to drive.
The neon has great performance, but I'm guessing that the chassis isn't as good as the WRX, nor does it have all wheel drive. But it is also under $20K.
All the cars have great BFB, it just depends on what you are looking for.
I'll still take the Z, thank you very much!
-D'oh!
The Z is by far the cheapest true sports car. I think the only close competition is the S2000 for that category.
The WRX has great performance, all wheel drive, and is very utilitarian. For only 23K it is hard to beat that value.
The Mustang Cobra has the best performance of all the cars, but is also more expensive and feels older than some of the others.
The protege is in the low teens for cost, but handles great for what it is: a really inexpensive car that is actually fun to drive.
The neon has great performance, but I'm guessing that the chassis isn't as good as the WRX, nor does it have all wheel drive. But it is also under $20K.
All the cars have great BFB, it just depends on what you are looking for.
I'll still take the Z, thank you very much!
-D'oh!
#14
Banned
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Smackahoe Blvd
Posts: 13,063
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The best bang for the buck I ever had was this girl that lived down the.............................................oh crap, I am still in the Z car forum. Sorry guys!
#15
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Alexandria, Va
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ermm, not that I condone such behavior, but I've heard that once you vote on the CD site, you then can go to your search file option and put in "caranddriver". This will bring up the two cookies that prevent you from voting more than once. If you delete these cookies...why...then you could go back to CD and vote again. Why, you could probably do this numerous times. Ermm....if you are computer minded, you could even write a script that does this for you over and over and over.
Tsk tsk tsk...people who do this
VG
Tsk tsk tsk...people who do this
VG
#16
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But see, bang for the buck is such a subjective thing. I wanted to buy the best performing car for the least amount of money HOWEVER I wanted a car that had good style.
I'm not looking to rally race-- and I'm sorry but I don't care if the WRX is slightly less expensive, or if the new Evo is going run a 4.6. Both cars are STUPID looking.
The Z is the whole package-- it looks great and performs great. I also would wager that resale on a Nissan is always going to be better than on a Subaru or Mitsubishi which further makes it a better deal.
I'm not looking to rally race-- and I'm sorry but I don't care if the WRX is slightly less expensive, or if the new Evo is going run a 4.6. Both cars are STUPID looking.
The Z is the whole package-- it looks great and performs great. I also would wager that resale on a Nissan is always going to be better than on a Subaru or Mitsubishi which further makes it a better deal.
#17
Charter Member #33
Join Date: May 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wait, if Dean says his WRX is more fun than a drunken frat party, I may want to pick one up. I've been to a few drunken frat parties in my time and I must say, I didn't think it was possible to have more fun than that!!
#18
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 5,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by LS350Z
Secondly - it's obvious this poll has been spammed by message forums and that's why the WRX is winning. There's several well established WRX sites and a lot more WRX drivers out there. I still contest to this day the WRX is the most overpriced car in the auto industry.
Secondly - it's obvious this poll has been spammed by message forums and that's why the WRX is winning. There's several well established WRX sites and a lot more WRX drivers out there. I still contest to this day the WRX is the most overpriced car in the auto industry.
I went for a test drive and was offered the car at 27k stock. I just about laughed when the msrp is 23k. WRX is pretty nice car but shouldn't be more then 20k IMO.
Besides at 27k and 26 k for the Z I think it was clear what my choice was going to be.
Do I want a practically real sports car. Or a 4 banger that wants to be a rally car.
#19
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: manchester united
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When the 350Z was first priced they told us 'Under 30 Grand'. We were all thinking 'Haha yeah probably $29,999'. But when they released the trims and pricing, starting at a very low $26k, I almost flipped out of my chair. I was VERY suprised Nissan would have the ***** to price it that low. For that price you can only dream of a car this good.
Base Z:
287 HP
276 Lb Ft of Torque
ABS Power Assisted Vented Brakes
6 Speed Close Ratio Transmission
Multi-Link Aluminum Suspension
Front/Rear Stabilizer Strut Bars
Carbon Fiber DriveShaft
Base Z:
287 HP
276 Lb Ft of Torque
ABS Power Assisted Vented Brakes
6 Speed Close Ratio Transmission
Multi-Link Aluminum Suspension
Front/Rear Stabilizer Strut Bars
Carbon Fiber DriveShaft
Last edited by SandMan; 11-27-2002 at 08:08 AM.
#20
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 5,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by SandMan
When the 350Z was first priced they told us 'Under 30 Grand'. We were all thinking 'Haha yeah probably $29,999'. But when they released the trims and pricing, starting at a very low $26k, I almost flipped out of my chair. I was VERY suprised Nissan would have the ***** to price it that low. For that price you can only dream of a car this good.
Base Z:
287 HP
276 Lb Ft of Torque
ABS Power Assisted Vented Brakes
6 Speed Close Ratio Transmission
Multi-Link Aluminum Suspension
Front/Rear Stabilizer Strut Bars
Carbon Fiber DriveShaft
When the 350Z was first priced they told us 'Under 30 Grand'. We were all thinking 'Haha yeah probably $29,999'. But when they released the trims and pricing, starting at a very low $26k, I almost flipped out of my chair. I was VERY suprised Nissan would have the ***** to price it that low. For that price you can only dream of a car this good.
Base Z:
287 HP
276 Lb Ft of Torque
ABS Power Assisted Vented Brakes
6 Speed Close Ratio Transmission
Multi-Link Aluminum Suspension
Front/Rear Stabilizer Strut Bars
Carbon Fiber DriveShaft
Personally I thought the same 29,999. So with taxes and extras it will run you 34k but I have my purchase agreement right here and my total is 29,092. For a base. Managed to get a nice car with options I want for under 30K.