Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

Some people are just asses...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-27-2003, 05:42 AM
  #21  
buzzdsm
Registered User
 
buzzdsm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,731
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I believe it was C&D that had to put a quart of oil in the M3 every 2-3K miles. German engineering at it best! Do you know how pissed I would be if I had just spent 50K on a car and it was burning through oil like a Pinto.
Old 03-27-2003, 07:48 AM
  #22  
g35or350z
Registered User
 
g35or350z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: socal
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by buzzdsm
I believe it was C&D that had to put a quart of oil in the M3 every 2-3K miles. German engineering at it best! Do you know how pissed I would be if I had just spent 50K on a car and it was burning through oil like a Pinto.
I thought they had to add 1 quart per 1k miles. The M3 manual states that burning 1 quart of oil per 600 miles is within normal limits.
Old 03-27-2003, 08:36 AM
  #23  
ares
Veteran
iTrader: (2)
 
ares's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: ATL
Posts: 10,816
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I didnt realize the new M3 used the old wankel engine.

*so how long before the board is spammed by the beemer guys?*
Old 03-27-2003, 12:05 PM
  #24  
Jason Bourne
Registered User
 
Jason Bourne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY, NY
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by mark_wilkins
I heard that the M3 blown engines were mainly occurring on the SMG II-equipped cars. Is this true?

-- Mark
This is not true. I've seen several E46 M3s blow engines at the track and subsequently be covered under warranty. One guy even started getting the dreaded knocking sound (indication that the engine is about to go boom) at Watkins Glen, he called his service advisor (BMW dealer) who told to keep tracking it until it blew. It did later that day and he got a new motor free of charge.

Just to bring a little bit more fodder to the discussion: the engine failures occured equally frequently on manual and SMG cars but tended to be cars produced around November 2001. The factory instituted a number of running production changes and seems to have now fixed the problem. And even though BMW at first tried to point the finger at the driver when engines blew, they later came through and admitted there was a problem and substantially extended the engine warranty for all affected users. The company eventually did very much the right thing.

I am a current BMW owner and was all set to get the E46 M3 when I decided that I didn't really need the extra seats and started looking at used Porsche 996s instead. Eventually I figured that I could save some more money with a 350z and have a new car that is almost as fast (on the track - which is where it matters for me). So now I'm about to become a BMWCCA instructor with a Nissan...

But I wouldn't knock the E46 M3, that motor is a real jewel and at the base price of the car ($46K) it is actually a very good deal. Problem is most people order all the options and end up with a 3600lb, $55K fast luxury car that ends up being less than appropriate for the track.

Jason
Old 03-27-2003, 02:09 PM
  #25  
Rob Nance
Registered User
 
Rob Nance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by ares
I didnt realize the new M3 used the old wankel engine.

*so how long before the board is spammed by the beemer guys?*
If it's these guys from this thread/forum, it's only a matter of time. I don't know if they are allowed to leave their fortress of BMW elitism though, might be against the rules.

http://forum.e46fanatics.com/showthr...threadid=72911

They are unbelievable. Are that many M3 owners really high school rich kids? Seriously, if you read around their board, almost everyone there is 16-18 years old and terrible brats. I am not saying every teenage kid who has a nice car is a brat, or shouldn't have it. I know we have some very responsible younger drivers on this board, and that's a good thing, but it only takes about 1-2 threads of reading over there to see they clearly don't fit into this category.
Old 03-27-2003, 02:21 PM
  #26  
Zmoney
Registered User
 
Zmoney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: orlando
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My buddy has a new M3. I drove it last weekend and took it up to 150mph with 5 people in the car. The car is amazing and pulled like crazy in every gear. I was very impressed but when I hop back in my Z I think I like the Z better. I cant really place why, I guess I just feel more comfortable and one with the Z.

The only complaint that I have about the M3 is the shifter. It felt kinda spongy to me. The M doesnt have that flick of the wrist feel like the Z has. I just dont see spending that much money on a car that could turn into a service night mare. My buddy has been though 2 tranny's already at 19k miles.
Old 03-27-2003, 02:36 PM
  #27  
BigBadBuford
Registered User
 
BigBadBuford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Hummelstown, PA
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

When I test drove an M3 it didn't feel all that impressive to me. When we drove to the dealer we were in my brother's '02 TA WS6 and although they are about the same in terms of acceleration it didn't feel very fast. I guess you could say the same thing about the Z though. It has decent top end power but the low rpm torque was lacking.

I was never too impressed with BMW shifters, they never felt super accurate to me, just a little too isolated. I like the Z's more direct feel.

My friend just bought a 330Ci and I think I might actually like that car a bit better, especially for the price. The engine feels a lot torquier and although it doesn't have the top end pull of the M3 it still pulls very well. You have to love the sound of the BMW's engines though, even my 533i sounds awesome at full bore, and they just seem to love revving to redline.
Old 03-27-2003, 02:56 PM
  #28  
350zSpeedRacer
Registered User
 
350zSpeedRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 4,084
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hey guys, the reason the BMW shifter sucks is because of their cable shifting trannies. But it doesn't stop at BMW--Porshe (and obviously Volkswagon), and Mercedes have the exact same feel. Like it's not totally in gear or it still has a ton of play when you KNOW it's in gear? That's German engineering for ya.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MicVelo
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z
34
05-30-2017 03:28 PM
HoBrahYouStink
Media Share
32
06-24-2016 10:58 PM
Dymsi
Exterior & Interior
14
09-29-2015 11:32 AM
35reilly
Forced Induction
6
09-28-2015 07:42 AM



Quick Reply: Some people are just asses...



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:18 AM.