Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

0-60 times for stock 350Z's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 02:53 PM
  #41  
kpiskin's Avatar
kpiskin
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,060
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach
Default

I thought by now you guys would be able to sense my sarcasm, I guess not.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 03:06 PM
  #42  
QuicksilverZ33's Avatar
QuicksilverZ33
Registered User
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 920
Likes: 1
From: east coast
Default

Originally Posted by kpiskin
I thought by now you guys would be able to sense my sarcasm, I guess not.
Don't worry I saw it lol
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 03:10 PM
  #43  
davidv's Avatar
davidv
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 42,753
Likes: 11
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by skmaxima2535
Does anyone know the 0-60 times every year for the 350Z
Yes. Deltafarce does.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 03:15 PM
  #44  
JCZ33's Avatar
JCZ33
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 0
From: GEORGIA
Default

0-60 times are insignificant when you drive a car that looks as great as the 350Z. It looks cool at any speed, especially parked or even flat out.

Reply
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 03:17 PM
  #45  
AWDBall20's Avatar
AWDBall20
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
From: so.cal
Default

So is the 06 heavier bc many people have been to track days and gotten a weight on 06 vs 03-05 and they have all said no difference. And how is an 06 with 13hp improvement over 05 slower. And 07 only has 6hp more and has been est. as it being faster than both when no one has data to prove this.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 04:59 PM
  #46  
skmaxima2535's Avatar
skmaxima2535
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 88
Likes: 1
From: Illinois
Default

Originally Posted by Alberto
This thread is silly...

Its a drivers race, and I doubt a stock Z would do 4.9, but 0-60 is for bench racers not for people that really run their cars. Whoever said a stock Z with slicks would likely break--->wow are you behind I ran slicks NA, with the single turbo and 1 pass so far with my Twin Turbo and over 500whp-still stock axles, no issues with launching. I cut 2.05 60ft bone stock, 1.8's NA and 1.7 with the single turbo slipping the clutch out of the hole not launching hard. For you 0-60 mag racers, if you type in my cars weight, 60ft, and 1/4 time and trap into a 0-60 calculator, the 0-60 time on my 11.98 run was 3.5 seconds. Watch the video if you want to time it
IT LOOKS LIKE TO ME THAT U CANT DRIVE ACCORDING TO UR VIDEO
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 05:03 PM
  #47  
Willie's Avatar
Willie
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 0
From: GA
Default

Originally Posted by skmaxima2535
IT LOOKS LIKE TO ME THAT U CANT DRIVE ACCORDING TO UR VIDEO
+1, a 2 second 60ft stock is really ****ty.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 05:04 PM
  #48  
drivenCSZ's Avatar
drivenCSZ
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,044
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Default

Originally Posted by skmaxima2535
IT LOOKS LIKE TO ME THAT U CANT DRIVE ACCORDING TO UR VIDEO

dude, i dont know how they roll on the maxima forums but you arent going to get very far here with your attitude. Plus those numbers that were posted are completely wrong. 4.9 for an 03? falling off a cliff maybe

EDIT: for not reading kipskins sarcasm, so on that note, yes those numbers are 100% C-O-R-R-E-K-T


if you knew anything about cars you'd know your question is pretty much retarded.


And your friend is retarded too if he's basing his decision on what year the Z has the fastest 0-60 . how old are you, 13?

Last edited by drivenCSZ; Feb 8, 2007 at 05:51 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 05:25 PM
  #49  
roast's Avatar
roast
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,092
Likes: 1
From: Okay, see?
Default

Originally Posted by skmaxima2535
IT LOOKS LIKE TO ME THAT U CANT DRIVE ACCORDING TO UR VIDEO
IT LOOKS TO ME LIKE SOMEONE IS JEALOUS
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 05:31 PM
  #50  
drivenCSZ's Avatar
drivenCSZ
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,044
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Default

Originally Posted by roast
IT LOOKS TO ME LIKE SOMEONE IS JEALOUS

pwnage
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 05:37 PM
  #51  
HDPDZO6's Avatar
HDPDZO6
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,998
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Default

Originally Posted by Alberto
Whoever said a stock Z with slicks would likely break--->wow are you behind I ran slicks NA, with the single turbo and 1 pass so far with my Twin Turbo and over 500whp-still stock axles, no issues with launching.
Stick to your opinion and me to mine. I would take the peace of mind and spend a few bucks on a drive shaft loop before running slicks. Just because your axles or DS didn't break doesn't mean all are safe. Friend of mine snapped an axle on his Z, and he is only at about 380 rwhp. Lucky him it was only the axle. Broken driveshaft (possible with slicks) can be alot more hazardous to one's and vehicle's health.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 09:07 PM
  #52  
VQ35DE350Zms's Avatar
VQ35DE350Zms
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
From: Albany
Default

Originally Posted by kpiskin
This is what the word is on the street:

2003 4.9
2004 5.3
2005 5.6
2006 6.0
2007 5.8

All that extra weight is a *****.
4.9 lol
and skmaxima2535 believed it lol OMG
someone teach this kid
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2007 | 03:23 AM
  #53  
Alberto's Avatar
Alberto
Cranky FI Owner
Premier Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 34,715
Likes: 8
From: DMV
Default

Originally Posted by HDPD350Z
Stick to your opinion and me to mine. I would take the peace of mind and spend a few bucks on a drive shaft loop before running slicks. Just because your axles or DS didn't break doesn't mean all are safe. Friend of mine snapped an axle on his Z, and he is only at about 380 rwhp. Lucky him it was only the axle. Broken driveshaft (possible with slicks) can be alot more hazardous to one's and vehicle's health.
Tell your friend to learn how to launch properly, MANY guys not just me over 400whp lauch on slicks with stock axles with no issues...

To the guys saying I cant drive due to a 2.05 60ft time stock, I only ran the car 3X stock---> 13.80, 13.77, 13.86 were the times, lets see you guys go do that in only 3 passes your first time out in the car
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2007 | 03:50 AM
  #54  
DROPPEDIT2WCE's Avatar
DROPPEDIT2WCE
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,855
Likes: 0
From: Bel Air, MD
Default

Originally Posted by skmaxima2535
IT LOOKS LIKE TO ME THAT U CANT DRIVE ACCORDING TO UR VIDEO

looks to me like you have 21 posts, type in all caps, and probably suck at life. Did you even watch the video, did you check the timeslip section? Do you have some better numbers to post that you can verify?

NO so
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2007 | 07:19 AM
  #55  
rockinbboy's Avatar
rockinbboy
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,096
Likes: 0
From: Wild Wild West
Default

I've gone plenty of times from 0 to 60 without even knowing it. Does that answer your question?
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2007 | 09:11 AM
  #56  
Alberto's Avatar
Alberto
Cranky FI Owner
Premier Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 34,715
Likes: 8
From: DMV
Default

Originally Posted by kpiskin
I thought by now you guys would be able to sense my sarcasm, I guess not.
Apparently Im retarded, lol sorry I obviously missed it
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2007 | 09:29 AM
  #57  
jelly's Avatar
jelly
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

None?... meaning the list does not account for those 06 Zs for whatever reason. If numbers were submitted and they were slow, then it should show on the list on the bottom. stock vs stock, 06 should be just as fast, and should pull on non-revups at higher speeds.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2007 | 09:58 AM
  #58  
tylerdurden07's Avatar
tylerdurden07
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
From: Alexandria, VA
Default

Originally Posted by skmaxima2535
IT LOOKS LIKE TO ME THAT U CANT DRIVE ACCORDING TO UR VIDEO

Have you ever driven a 500+ RWHP FI vehicle? If so, please feel free to respond.. If not, hush.

Originally Posted by Willie
+1, a 2 second 60ft stock is really ****ty.
For a RWD vehicle that is stock, you're saying thats $h!tty? What are your stock 60ft's sir? Please enlighten me..
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2007 | 10:10 AM
  #59  
DROPPEDIT2WCE's Avatar
DROPPEDIT2WCE
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,855
Likes: 0
From: Bel Air, MD
Default

Originally Posted by tylerdurden07
Have you ever driven a 500+ RWHP FI vehicle? If so, please feel free to respond.. If not, hush.



For a RWD vehicle that is stock, you're saying thats $h!tty? What are your stock 60ft's sir? Please enlighten me..

I would also be intrigued to know this as well... probably high 2-3 seconds lol non enthusiasts/haters... sad sad sad

Alberto 11.9 w/ single turbo sucks! LMAO just kidding of course...
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2007 | 10:14 AM
  #60  
Willie's Avatar
Willie
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 0
From: GA
Default

Originally Posted by tylerdurden07

For a RWD vehicle that is stock, you're saying thats $h!tty? What are your stock 60ft's sir? Please enlighten me..
im kidding
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:18 PM.