I would never rock an S2K. Main reason, is that I am 6'5" tall, and I simply don't fit. I actually like the looks of some of them when they are done up right.

T-o-r-q-u-e makes a BIG difference in our monZters, guy! With less RPMs you get a pocket rocket, VS the S2000. Technical data: MT "Z", 260ft-lbs of torque. With auto tranny, 274ft-lbs!!!

Damm this is really an old thread.....

:confused: really, i own both. when driven properly the S2000 will outperform the z on most road courses, especially tight courses with alot of turns. i would think the z would do better on the longer tracks/speedways. if you go to redlinetimeattack.com, the S2000 wins pretty consistantly. but i enjoy driving my z in everyday use.

GT = grand touring.
The 350 does have more torque, which is why s2000 owners give the 350 the upper hand when shopping for daily drivers. One thing you guys lack that the s2ki guys have is that you guys don't give credit where it's due. I mean just read over the number of posts saying "I will never buy a Honda!", "That thing is a convertible civic!", and so on. There is no "lack of torque" with the s2000 on the track, because you never drop below 6k and you're always making full use of the powerband. Wow guys let the torque statements die, it's getting old. For the record I don't own either so I'm not really biased either.

this thread has so many fan boys its not even funny.

:clap: good for the S2000....... it's all about the driver IMO

http://album.hybridz.org/data/500/hondahump.gif

Thanks you Mr. Obvious. After all, this is a 350Z forum.

These "what's better" or "what would you choose" threads are useless and so predictable. It goes without saying that we think the 350Z is a better car because that's what we chose.

^^^^^

Thanks you OP for coming back and putting some closure to this long running waste of bandwidth.