CAR lap tims: New Z matches M3
09-02-2007, 08:37 PM
#21
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 5,998
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Archbishop
Don't be upset with me because you failed to read what I posted. Your reading comprehension is your problem, not mine.
You failed at posting when you made this thread.
09-02-2007, 08:37 PM
#22
09-02-2007, 08:42 PM
#24
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Fl
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by HDPD350Z
Your first post listed times and you made the claim the 350Z matched the M3's lap time. You made no indication of the linked pics being inaccurately. In fact, the linked pics refuted your claim. It wasn't until a subsequent post in which you made your correction.
You failed at posting when you made this thread.
You failed at posting when you made this thread.
09-02-2007, 08:43 PM
#26
Originally Posted by Archbishop
Because the Current issue of CAR doesn't have it listed. You can wait till next month, and pick up an issue of your own, just to see the Z added in bold letters. But I'm sure the majority of people will not have the same problem you are having.
lol
09-02-2007, 08:44 PM
#27
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Fl
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SOLO-350Z
He fails in all his posts. 20 hp exhaust gains, 7800 rpm fuel cut on 07 Z, MREV no top end gains actually losses, and so on. Review all his posts, its crazy.
I posted more than 2 different, and idependent Dynos proving my claims. In BOTH threads. You on the other hand have posted NOTHING, and continue to hijack my threads. Its childish, and its getting old.
09-02-2007, 08:45 PM
#29
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Fl
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SOLO-350Z
Got a question, how DO YOU KNOW this if we can't pick up this article till next month? But somehow you got this info?
lol
lol
*Sigh* I'm done, I give up.
09-02-2007, 08:46 PM
#31
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Fl
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SOLO-350Z
You were proven wrong. and wrong and wrong again. But just like here, you keep denying it.
09-02-2007, 08:47 PM
#32
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Fl
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SOLO-350Z
Good leave the site no one likes you anyways.
Guess you were lieing.
Guess you were lieing.
09-02-2007, 08:53 PM
#35
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Fl
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You mean like what you posted?
https://my350z.com/forum/showpost.ph...&postcount=300
And This is what Tony posted:
You were saying?
Originally Posted by SOLO-350Z
Again your ignoring the fact he said if you want your top end back, you put the 5/16 spacer in there. You keep ignoring that. Can't believe we have people like this on the net.
I am done for tonight. I will let others argue with this ethug.
I am done for tonight. I will let others argue with this ethug.
And This is what Tony posted:
Originally Posted by Hydrazine
I was referring the 1/2" spacer relative to the 5/16" spacer.
---
With the MREV2/spacer combo, the gain is not across the whole band, but the average within the rev range of any gear you shift, it will be higher.
The average is greater if you shift at redline and the difference only increases if you shift at anything less than redline.
So no matter how you shift, the average power will be greater with the MREV2/spacer combination.
---
With the MREV2/spacer combo, the gain is not across the whole band, but the average within the rev range of any gear you shift, it will be higher.
The average is greater if you shift at redline and the difference only increases if you shift at anything less than redline.
So no matter how you shift, the average power will be greater with the MREV2/spacer combination.
09-02-2007, 08:54 PM
#36
Thank you for posting the link to the Quote of Tonys post showing it gains top end power when adding the spacer. Which my dynos also showed when I was a beta tester for Tony.
Hi guys,
The above plot is real, but it is the MREV2 without the spacer.
In that same article they show the cumulation of the spacer added.
Compare the MREV2(with the 5/16" spacer) against baseline for the final result. The spacer is needed for the additional top end HP.
Tony
EDIT: For the REVUP engine, I always recommend doing both the spacer and MREV2 for this reason.
And if for example you can't purchase both at the same time. Get the MREV2. It will give you the above curve with significant midrange gains. You can always add the spacer later for top end gains.
But don't do just the spacer on a REVUP lower collector. They don't work on REVUP lower collectors. Spacers and upper plenum mods only work on non-revup lower collectors and MREV2 lower collectors.
I hope this isn't throughly confusing.
Hi guys,
The above plot is real, but it is the MREV2 without the spacer.
In that same article they show the cumulation of the spacer added.
Compare the MREV2(with the 5/16" spacer) against baseline for the final result. The spacer is needed for the additional top end HP.
Tony
EDIT: For the REVUP engine, I always recommend doing both the spacer and MREV2 for this reason.
And if for example you can't purchase both at the same time. Get the MREV2. It will give you the above curve with significant midrange gains. You can always add the spacer later for top end gains.
But don't do just the spacer on a REVUP lower collector. They don't work on REVUP lower collectors. Spacers and upper plenum mods only work on non-revup lower collectors and MREV2 lower collectors.
I hope this isn't throughly confusing.
09-03-2007, 07:42 AM
#37
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Germantown/Knoxville, TN
Posts: 862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Let me make it a little more clear for you retard....in case the banana picture didn't do it for you.
You don't make a claim about a lap time and then go to the trouble of posting pictures of lap times, obviously to support your claim, when there isn't anything of substance in those pictures that actually confirms anything you're saying.
What exactly was the point of posting the pictures again? Could this not have waited until you could take a picture of the new lap time? And why didn't you take a picture of the new lap?
AAAANNNDDD...big ****ing deal. A 350Z matches an M3's lap time. It's not like the car is undefeatable (although technically, matching isn't beating it now is it?
). And I'm pretty sure everyone here knows the 350Z is a more than capable car on the track. But once again, my point is proven...you're still comparing it to the M3. That ought to tell you something. It's still THE car to try and beat...and they haven't even made the damn thing for a year now. So why don't you wait just a little bit longer,even though it appears waiting might actually kill you, see what the new M3 does and report back to us. I have a feeling the 350Z will once again be playing catch-up for the next few years.
You don't make a claim about a lap time and then go to the trouble of posting pictures of lap times, obviously to support your claim, when there isn't anything of substance in those pictures that actually confirms anything you're saying.
What exactly was the point of posting the pictures again? Could this not have waited until you could take a picture of the new lap time? And why didn't you take a picture of the new lap?
AAAANNNDDD...big ****ing deal. A 350Z matches an M3's lap time. It's not like the car is undefeatable (although technically, matching isn't beating it now is it?
). And I'm pretty sure everyone here knows the 350Z is a more than capable car on the track. But once again, my point is proven...you're still comparing it to the M3. That ought to tell you something. It's still THE car to try and beat...and they haven't even made the damn thing for a year now. So why don't you wait just a little bit longer,even though it appears waiting might actually kill you, see what the new M3 does and report back to us. I have a feeling the 350Z will once again be playing catch-up for the next few years.
Last edited by teh_ginger; 09-03-2007 at 07:49 AM.
09-03-2007, 08:42 AM
#38
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,944
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So a brand new 07 Z can supposedly (since the OP still hasn't proven a thing) match a 6 year old car (no engine changes during its run, unlike the Z) around the track. Whoop-dee-do.
09-03-2007, 03:20 PM
#40
New Member
Originally Posted by porschefan1013
I have a feeling the 350Z will once again be playing catch-up for the next few years.