350Z vs S2000 According to Nissan
08-24-2002, 08:02 AM
#1
SFZCC
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Lake Worth, FL
Posts: 7,419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
350Z vs S2000 According to Nissan
Here is first page of comparison between 350Z and S2000 there are a total of 4 pages coming:
Last edited by westpak; 08-24-2002 at 08:22 AM.
08-24-2002, 08:22 AM
#6
Charter Member #79
Join Date: May 2002
Location: dc
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Great POST.
Any chance of scanning some of the other comparison articles. But if you would rather not, thx for posting this one, I have always felt the S2000 is the closest competitor to the Z so it was nice to see Nissan's thoughts on the subject.
Any chance of scanning some of the other comparison articles. But if you would rather not, thx for posting this one, I have always felt the S2000 is the closest competitor to the Z so it was nice to see Nissan's thoughts on the subject.
08-24-2002, 08:30 AM
#7
SFZCC
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Lake Worth, FL
Posts: 7,419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by VQracer
ack can't read anything
thanks for scanning though.
ack can't read anything
thanks for scanning though.
Trending Topics
08-24-2002, 09:29 AM
#10
Charter Member #50
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,552
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Performance Stats
----------350z------S2000------BoxterS
=========================
0-30-----2.23------2.96--------2.18-----=
0-60-----6.31------7.14--------6.26-----=
40-60----2.36------2.97--------2.52-----=
1/4mi----14.54-----15.55------14.87----=
==========================
What's up with the numbers for 350Z? That is also with 6MT
Did they have 2 people and equipments in the cars during the testing?
=========================
0-30-----2.23------2.96--------2.18-----=
0-60-----6.31------7.14--------6.26-----=
40-60----2.36------2.97--------2.52-----=
1/4mi----14.54-----15.55------14.87----=
==========================
What's up with the numbers for 350Z? That is also with 6MT
Did they have 2 people and equipments in the cars during the testing?
Last edited by Apexi350z; 08-24-2002 at 09:35 AM.
11-13-2002, 05:37 PM
#13
SFZCC
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Lake Worth, FL
Posts: 7,419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by electrokill
Yes, it's so nice to hear Nissan's accurate, completely unbiased viewpoint of the very automobiles they're competing against.
Yes, it's so nice to hear Nissan's accurate, completely unbiased viewpoint of the very automobiles they're competing against.
Anyways, those numbers are damn slow, like YIKES.
11-13-2002, 07:03 PM
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
This is really old and has been talked about. This brochure was never meant for public release, as there are skewered facts and misinformation. Obviously the times are slow. They also say the S2000 has a belt driven drivetrain, when it's not. They also say other things like a blown tire (full size) won't even fit in the trunk, when it will.
Old news.
Old news.
11-13-2002, 07:37 PM
#18
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is another useless comparison that is going to give fodder to the relentless trolls and fools to start flaming each other over cars.
Great...just what the world needs!
Great...just what the world needs!
