Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

Crazy Driver just stoped 80-0mph on RT 78

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 26, 2009 | 01:09 PM
  #21  
almost3flips's Avatar
almost3flips
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

Wow. Glad you saved yourself and your Z.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2009 | 01:22 PM
  #22  
Jimmies's Avatar
Jimmies
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Default

Impressive save, to say the least. You had only a split second to react.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2009 | 01:25 PM
  #23  
dfresh713's Avatar
dfresh713
Master
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 3
From: New Jersey
Default

I drive on 78 on my way to work. WTF was that person slamming on there brakes for?? BTW cruising at 80-85 mph is normal for that road.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2009 | 01:30 PM
  #24  
CRIDDA's Avatar
CRIDDA
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,649
Likes: 2
From: A-TOWN
Default

Nice, glad to see you made it out ok. Now go home and clean your seats, cause I swear I could hear you shat yourself
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2009 | 01:56 PM
  #25  
Jay'Z's Avatar
Jay'Z
Banned
iTrader: (118)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 1
From: Carbon Fiber, TX
Default

I say you never base your observations on traffic by the car directly in front of you.. That would be silly.....
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2009 | 06:57 PM
  #26  
mistanismo's Avatar
mistanismo
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Default

That was not the flow of traffic. You were gaining on him at quite a speed and already 'tailgating'.

You see when you went under that bridge? Time your own distance behind the vehicle in front of you. Less than 1 second.

I have no idea what the american standard is, but the Canadian standard is 3 seconds, espesially on a highway to accomodate the higher speed and increased stopping distance.

That could have been avoided. You're incredibly lucky that car you passed was further back then your blindspot or you'd be at fault in what I imagine would have been at least a 2 car collision.

You clearly know how to drive, but that's no excuse for poor driving habits.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2009 | 11:08 PM
  #27  
Phantom_Z's Avatar
Phantom_Z
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: .....
Default

WOW, that was close!
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2009 | 07:23 AM
  #28  
2pink1stink's Avatar
2pink1stink
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: the deep south.
Default

Very nice save. I bet your heart rate went up a bit on that one. good job.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2009 | 08:03 AM
  #29  
Tac-M's Avatar
Tac-M
Registered User
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,732
Likes: 2
From: 127.0.0.1
Default

very well done sir.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2009 | 10:49 AM
  #30  
dhays's Avatar
dhays
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 990
Likes: 1
From: University Place, WA
Default

Originally Posted by mistanismo
That was not the flow of traffic. You were gaining on him at quite a speed and already 'tailgating'.

You see when you went under that bridge? Time your own distance behind the vehicle in front of you. Less than 1 second.

I have no idea what the american standard is, but the Canadian standard is 3 seconds, espesially on a highway to accomodate the higher speed and increased stopping distance.

That could have been avoided. You're incredibly lucky that car you passed was further back then your blindspot or you'd be at fault in what I imagine would have been at least a 2 car collision.

You clearly know how to drive, but that's no excuse for poor driving habits.
I agree. Maybe this close call will make the OP a bit more careful in the future. Nice save, but it is much better to not put yourself in the position of having to get lucky to keep your car, and other folks cars, intact.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2010 | 08:37 PM
  #31  
I DTW I's Avatar
I DTW I
New Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 211
Likes: 3
From: Columbus, Ohio
Default

That's freakin CRAZY man! I couldn't do that in Test Drive Unlimited on the computer, let alone doing it in real life when you only have one try to get it right!

But the Canadian guy is right, you gotta apply the 3 second rule for following distances. The rule applies at ALL speeds.

I'm sure most everybody on these forums would agree that speeding a little isn't nearly as dangerous as not keeping adequate following distance, because we know what would've happened if it wasn't the OP in a 350z following that stupid guy, but somebody else with a different car!
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2010 | 06:34 AM
  #32  
LuciaPwNs's Avatar
LuciaPwNs
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 795
Likes: 0
From: PA
Default

Originally Posted by Blueknight74
Let’s just say not all cop are good & they are good ones. I was pulled over & wrongfully accused. So now when my car is on my camera is on. Don’t want it to happen again.
ive thought about that many times
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2010 | 06:54 AM
  #33  
kacz07's Avatar
kacz07
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,936
Likes: 4
From: NJ
Default

Originally Posted by 2pink1stink
Very nice save. I bet your heart rate went up a bit on that one. good job.
Probably happened too fast for his body to go "fight/flight" mode.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2010 | 09:14 AM
  #34  
Armitage's Avatar
Armitage
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,163
Likes: 3
From: North Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by mistanismo
That was not the flow of traffic. You were gaining on him at quite a speed and already 'tailgating'.

You see when you went under that bridge? Time your own distance behind the vehicle in front of you. Less than 1 second.

I have no idea what the american standard is, but the Canadian standard is 3 seconds, espesially on a highway to accomodate the higher speed and increased stopping distance.

That could have been avoided. You're incredibly lucky that car you passed was further back then your blindspot or you'd be at fault in what I imagine would have been at least a 2 car collision.

You clearly know how to drive, but that's no excuse for poor driving habits.
+1. Here in the states, unofficially its like 2-3 seconds I think above 60mph. Thats generally at least two car and usually enough time to brake in the event of an emergency.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2010 | 09:24 AM
  #35  
NISMO_558's Avatar
NISMO_558
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,003
Likes: 4
From: Minnesota
Default

Originally Posted by Armitage
+1. Here in the states, unofficially its like 2-3 seconds I think above 60mph. Thats generally at least two car and usually enough time to brake in the event of an emergency.
It's technically suppose to be 1 second for every 10mph.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2010 | 10:02 AM
  #36  
HOMiEZ's Avatar
HOMiEZ
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 448
Likes: 25
From: Irvine, CA
Default

Originally Posted by mistanismo
That was not the flow of traffic. You were gaining on him at quite a speed and already 'tailgating'.

You see when you went under that bridge? Time your own distance behind the vehicle in front of you. Less than 1 second.

I have no idea what the american standard is, but the Canadian standard is 3 seconds, espesially on a highway to accomodate the higher speed and increased stopping distance.

That could have been avoided. You're incredibly lucky that car you passed was further back then your blindspot or you'd be at fault in what I imagine would have been at least a 2 car collision.

You clearly know how to drive, but that's no excuse for poor driving habits.
+1 there is no telling what the car, two cars in front of you is doing in certain situations, so its best not to stick too close to them. Great save though.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2010 | 10:27 AM
  #37  
lugrug's Avatar
lugrug
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

Don't be so quick to call the driver that stopped crazy. we don't know the full story. Perhaps a pet ardvark escaped it's cage and bit him on the nuts. I know if I had a pet ardvark chomping on my nuts, I'd stop too.

Last edited by lugrug; Jan 2, 2010 at 10:28 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2010 | 05:08 PM
  #38  
Armitage's Avatar
Armitage
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,163
Likes: 3
From: North Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by NISMO_558
It's technically suppose to be 1 second for every 10mph.
Lol yeah and if that were the case, I'd always have people cutting in front of me. And the vicious cycle continues... lol.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2010 | 05:25 PM
  #39  
*Boose*'s Avatar
*Boose*
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,447
Likes: 0
From: Rapid City, SD Ellsworth AFB
Default

Originally Posted by dfresh713
I drive on 78 on my way to work. WTF was that person slamming on there brakes for?? BTW cruising at 80-85 mph is normal for that road.
Cause it's NJ.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2010 | 09:41 AM
  #40  
winchman's Avatar
winchman
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 5
From: Georgia
Default

Did the car you were following hit the car that stopped?

When I was flying out of a small airport in SC, there was a fellow there who was really good at handling a plane, but lacked the judgment to avoid putting himself and others in danger.

Everyone agreed he was the pilot you'd want to have with you if something went wrong, but none of us flew with him more than once.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:17 PM.