is the HR Motor worth the extra money?
01-05-2010, 09:05 AM
#41
I bought my 04.5 Z well before the HR's came out, but if it was an option at the time I definitely would have bought the HR over a DE. That said, get what you can afford. It's unbelievable how much performance/style you can get nowadays from the early model year Z's for the price, assuming they haven't been thoroughly abused.
.
Im sticking with bolt ons, and like the response from the engine I'm getting! No turbo for me...to much $$$
01-05-2010, 04:23 PM
#47
Registered User
iTrader: (35)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Depends what you are going to use the car for. If its for the track, get the earliest year you can find and do suspension and brake mods. The lower weight and higher low end torque will get you around the track faster. If you plan on doing some uber cool jdm 4 lane drag racing fast and furious style, get the HR. They make more power up top, and unless you have a full bolt-on DE, the HR will be quicker.
My DE with intake and exhaust ended up being a dead even tie with a bone stock HR, so mod the HR equally and it's ahead again. Only thing the HR doesn't benefit from (at least yet) are the super high end products such as Cosworth heads/plenums, etc. With that kind of stuff on a DE, you will pull on bolt-on HR's no problem, but you're talking big $$. If you are going to boost the car, HR's I hear can make more power with a TT kit, but cost much more to boost than DE cars. Hope this helps.
My DE with intake and exhaust ended up being a dead even tie with a bone stock HR, so mod the HR equally and it's ahead again. Only thing the HR doesn't benefit from (at least yet) are the super high end products such as Cosworth heads/plenums, etc. With that kind of stuff on a DE, you will pull on bolt-on HR's no problem, but you're talking big $$. If you are going to boost the car, HR's I hear can make more power with a TT kit, but cost much more to boost than DE cars. Hope this helps.
01-07-2010, 05:01 AM
#52
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
both engines respond in similar fashion to bolt ons
to the OP - your best bet is a simple thing. Drive both. Weight the price vs what each one feels like to you, and make a decision. Asking a bunch of strangers isn't going to get you any closer to a decision.
01-07-2010, 08:10 AM
#54
Depends what you are going to use the car for. If its for the track, get the earliest year you can find and do suspension and brake mods. The lower weight and higher low end torque will get you around the track faster. If you plan on doing some uber cool jdm 4 lane drag racing fast and furious style, get the HR. They make more power up top, and unless you have a full bolt-on DE, the HR will be quicker.
My DE with intake and exhaust ended up being a dead even tie with a bone stock HR, so mod the HR equally and it's ahead again. Only thing the HR doesn't benefit from (at least yet) are the super high end products such as Cosworth heads/plenums, etc. With that kind of stuff on a DE, you will pull on bolt-on HR's no problem, but you're talking big $$. If you are going to boost the car, HR's I hear can make more power with a TT kit, but cost much more to boost than DE cars. Hope this helps.
My DE with intake and exhaust ended up being a dead even tie with a bone stock HR, so mod the HR equally and it's ahead again. Only thing the HR doesn't benefit from (at least yet) are the super high end products such as Cosworth heads/plenums, etc. With that kind of stuff on a DE, you will pull on bolt-on HR's no problem, but you're talking big $$. If you are going to boost the car, HR's I hear can make more power with a TT kit, but cost much more to boost than DE cars. Hope this helps.
Tuned or untuned with intake and exhaust?
01-07-2010, 06:56 PM
#55
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: north NJ
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm going to sound biasd because I have an HR but find me a DE that will do 108-109 in the 1/4 mile bone stock and I will reconsider my choice. I'm not realy into drag racing either. The way I look at it if the HR wasn't better Nissan wouldn't have changed from the DE.
01-07-2010, 08:31 PM
#56
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 5,998
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
01-08-2010, 04:44 AM
#58
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: north NJ
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not my car but I saw this a while ago.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G_VbsXSS7PI
I thought it was pretty impressive!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G_VbsXSS7PI
I thought it was pretty impressive!
01-08-2010, 05:42 AM
#60
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Get out my way pimpin, MD/PA
Posts: 5,568
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
here is a crappy vid of us running, but at the end are the time slips... he trapped 106.94 and 107.24 to my 110mph traps that day..
now are 109 mph traps on a stock HR the norm.... absolutely not.... but it has been done...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmuUrjulH1A
Last edited by C5_vette; 01-08-2010 at 05:43 AM.