Hit and run collision repair WHO VOTES I GET ANTENNA DELETE
There is plenty of good ammunition, like the fact that your just as stupid as the OP, that public school education is really showing.
You here on a stop internet bullying crusade or soemthing? if not, get the sand out your vagina and roll somewhere else. Aint nobody got time for that, your more butthurt over the OP about the opinions he asked us for.
Most intelligent species have the ability to make inferences, and use context clues. I am sorry if this is lost with you, but I will try to dumb down what I was saying to you.
In response to you saying that you can't understand my whole sentence due to the word "bullies" being spelled "bullys", I said - that doesn't give you many credentials for calling other people idiots.
Because, if you can't even understand a simple sentence based on one word spelled slightly off, than you're not at the top of the intelligent list yourself. In fact, possibly pretty low down on said list. Therefor, giving you no right to insult other peoples intelligence.
In response to you saying that you can't understand my whole sentence due to the word "bullies" being spelled "bullys", I said - that doesn't give you many credentials for calling other people idiots.
Because, if you can't even understand a simple sentence based on one word spelled slightly off, than you're not at the top of the intelligent list yourself. In fact, possibly pretty low down on said list. Therefor, giving you no right to insult other peoples intelligence.
Close.
Most intelligent individuals have the ability to make inferences, using contextual clues. I am sorry if this is lost on you, but I will try to dumb down what I was saying to you.
In response to you saying that you couldn't (you are mixing past and present tense in this sentence) understand my whole sentence due to the word "bullies" being spelled "bullys," (comma goes inside quotes) I said - "that doesn't give you many credentials for calling other people idiots."
Because, (never start a sentence with "because") if you can't even understand a simple sentence based on one word spelled slightly off, than you're not at the top of the intelligence list yourself. In fact, possibly pretty ("pretty" is redundant) low down ("down" is redundant) on said list. Therefore, you have no right to insult other peoples' intelligence.
Try again.
Last edited by Syner; Nov 15, 2013 at 09:01 AM.
Close.
Most intelligent individuals have the ability to make inferences, using contextual clues. I am sorry if this is lost on you, but I will try to dumb down what I was saying to you.
In response to you saying that you couldn't (you are mixing past and present tense in this sentence) understand my whole sentence due to the word "bullies" being spelled "bullys," (comma goes inside quotes) I said - "that doesn't give you many credentials for calling other people idiots."
Because, (never start a sentence with "because") if you can't even understand a simple sentence based on one word spelled slightly off, than you're not at the top of the intelligence list yourself. In fact, possibly pretty ("pretty" is redundant) low down ("down" is redundant) on said list. Therefore, you have no right to insult other peoples' intelligence.
Try again.
Most intelligent individuals have the ability to make inferences, using contextual clues. I am sorry if this is lost on you, but I will try to dumb down what I was saying to you.
In response to you saying that you couldn't (you are mixing past and present tense in this sentence) understand my whole sentence due to the word "bullies" being spelled "bullys," (comma goes inside quotes) I said - "that doesn't give you many credentials for calling other people idiots."
Because, (never start a sentence with "because") if you can't even understand a simple sentence based on one word spelled slightly off, than you're not at the top of the intelligence list yourself. In fact, possibly pretty ("pretty" is redundant) low down ("down" is redundant) on said list. Therefore, you have no right to insult other peoples' intelligence.
Try again.
Fuuckinn BOOM
There are multiple ways to write the same thing. Just because you can find another way to word something, doesn't mean that the first wording of it was improper.
There was nothing wrong with my response to you, Syner, besides my one punctuation mistake and the misspelling of "therefore"
Now, is there a point to this? It seems as if you just want to stay in an argument for the sake of being in an argument, and have moved on to things that don't matter.
Or should I go back through all your post history to expose you as less than the god-like English major this board has never seen?
There was nothing wrong with my response to you, Syner, besides my one punctuation mistake and the misspelling of "therefore"
Now, is there a point to this? It seems as if you just want to stay in an argument for the sake of being in an argument, and have moved on to things that don't matter.
Or should I go back through all your post history to expose you as less than the god-like English major this board has never seen?
There are multiple ways to write the same thing. Just because you can find another way to word something, doesn't mean that the first wording of it was improper.
There was nothing wrong with my response to you, Syner, besides my one punctuation mistake and the misspelling of "therefore"
Now, is there a point to this? It seems as if you just want to stay in an argument for the sake of being in an argument, and have moved on to things that don't matter.
Or should I go back through all your post history to expose you as less than the god-like English major this board has never seen?
There was nothing wrong with my response to you, Syner, besides my one punctuation mistake and the misspelling of "therefore"
Now, is there a point to this? It seems as if you just want to stay in an argument for the sake of being in an argument, and have moved on to things that don't matter.
Or should I go back through all your post history to expose you as less than the god-like English major this board has never seen?
Now get on your knees.
EDIT - you forgot a period at the end of your second sentence (FYI).
Last edited by Syner; Nov 15, 2013 at 09:10 AM.
Point proven.
Not going to respond to your lame attempts at flame baiting anymore.
I originally posted to make a point, not to argue for the sake of arguing.
I will, however, argue if it's to further my point.
So, if you are so desperate on arguing and having fanboys cheer you on ("boooooom") to make you feel better, than start countering my points, not my spelling and grammar.
Not going to respond to your lame attempts at flame baiting anymore.
I originally posted to make a point, not to argue for the sake of arguing.
I will, however, argue if it's to further my point.
So, if you are so desperate on arguing and having fanboys cheer you on ("boooooom") to make you feel better, than start countering my points, not my spelling and grammar.
Last edited by BranZ; Nov 15, 2013 at 09:12 AM.
Point proven.
Not going to respond to your lame attempts at flame baiting anymore.
I originally posted to make a point, not to argue for the sake of arguing.
I will however, argue if it's to further my point.
So, if you are so desperate on arguing and having fanboys cheer you on ("boooooom") to make you feel better, than start countering my points, not my spelling and grammar.
Not going to respond to your lame attempts at flame baiting anymore.
I originally posted to make a point, not to argue for the sake of arguing.
I will however, argue if it's to further my point.
So, if you are so desperate on arguing and having fanboys cheer you on ("boooooom") to make you feel better, than start countering my points, not my spelling and grammar.
I got burned, now come rub some lotion on me, bebe.







