Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

Best dumb facebook Z posts....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 25, 2014 | 11:00 AM
  #261  
Ragusa350z's Avatar
Ragusa350z
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: South Brunswick Nj
Default

i been trying to make it on here.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2014 | 04:39 AM
  #262  
Z33Garage's Avatar
Z33Garage
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,755
Likes: 26
From: Orlando
Default

Originally Posted by TuckerE36
I saw that post last night lol, what an absolute idiot.

On a side note, have y'all seen Dugan's posts on there these past couple of days lol.



LMFAO!!!!
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2014 | 05:00 PM
  #263  
terrasmak's Avatar
terrasmak
Super Moderator
MY350Z.COM
Premier Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 29,119
Likes: 2,400
From: Sin City
Default

What is with all the cars running full body kits and stock wheels. Is a body kit more desirable than putting a nice set of shoes on your car?
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2014 | 06:43 AM
  #264  
Broseph Stalin's Avatar
Broseph Stalin
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: Tampa
Default

This page is too good

Name:  CA20140328101736_zpsqwbofhjc.png
Views: 79
Size:  141.9 KB
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2014 | 06:46 AM
  #265  
Z33Garage's Avatar
Z33Garage
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,755
Likes: 26
From: Orlando
Default

It has gotten to the point that I get the urge to sell my Z if I read some of the FB posts....
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2014 | 06:48 AM
  #266  
Broseph Stalin's Avatar
Broseph Stalin
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: Tampa
Default

Why are 350z owners so bad? Majority of them seem really misinformed. I used to have a 240sx and that community didn't seem to be nearly as bad
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2014 | 06:49 AM
  #267  
travlee's Avatar
travlee
Master
Premier Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 49,725
Likes: 9,296
From: Texas
Default

because the car is getting cheaper and alot of douchy kids are buying them now
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2014 | 06:54 AM
  #268  
Broseph Stalin's Avatar
Broseph Stalin
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: Tampa
Default

Makes sense

Name:  Screenshot_2014-03-28-10-50-27_zpsak7n4k5c.png
Views: 98
Size:  129.0 KB
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2014 | 06:55 AM
  #269  
Syner's Avatar
Syner
New Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 22,798
Likes: 829
From: Alberta
Default

Originally Posted by Broseph Stalin
Why are 350z owners so bad? Majority of them seem really misinformed. I used to have a 240sx and that community didn't seem to be nearly as bad
The 240 went through it as well. (at least in my area it did)
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2014 | 07:28 AM
  #270  
Z33Garage's Avatar
Z33Garage
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,755
Likes: 26
From: Orlando
Default

I guess we have to wait it out till the locusts move on to some new platform to destroy....
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2014 | 07:38 AM
  #271  
Syner's Avatar
Syner
New Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 22,798
Likes: 829
From: Alberta
Default

Originally Posted by go7roo7
I guess we have to wait it out till the locusts move on to some new platform to destroy....
BRZ/FRS? Veloster? Those are all pretty cheap hahaha
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2014 | 11:38 PM
  #272  
bmcmvox's Avatar
bmcmvox
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 69
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, Canada
Default

What's Facebook.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2014 | 04:28 PM
  #273  
Broseph Stalin's Avatar
Broseph Stalin
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: Tampa
Default

Why is the de vs. hr argument a thing? The hr was designed to be a better motor, right?
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2014 | 05:00 PM
  #274  
Jah70's Avatar
Jah70
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,901
Likes: 13
From: Greenwich, Connecticut
Default

Originally Posted by Broseph Stalin
Why is the de vs. hr argument a thing? The hr was designed to be a better motor, right?
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2014 | 05:03 PM
  #275  
Jah70's Avatar
Jah70
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,901
Likes: 13
From: Greenwich, Connecticut
Default

Wrong thread cowboy. Reason why it's so annoying to see a thread like that is because if you go to the search option and type in de vs. hr, your going to see more de vs hr threads than charlie sheen has done 8 ***** and they always turn into a **** fighting contest.

Last edited by Jah70; Apr 9, 2014 at 05:05 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2014 | 05:12 PM
  #276  
Broseph Stalin's Avatar
Broseph Stalin
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: Tampa
Default

Originally Posted by Jah70
Wrong thread cowboy. Reason why it's so annoying to see a thread like that is because if you go to the search option and type in de vs. hr, your going to see more de vs hr threads than charlie sheen has done 8 ***** and they always turn into a **** fighting contest.
You completely lost me. What?

Last edited by Broseph Stalin; Apr 9, 2014 at 05:12 PM. Reason: .
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2014 | 05:39 PM
  #277  
Jah70's Avatar
Jah70
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,901
Likes: 13
From: Greenwich, Connecticut
Default

Originally Posted by Broseph Stalin

You completely lost me. What?
Logout bro.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2014 | 05:43 PM
  #278  
RUNWDVL's Avatar
RUNWDVL
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 4,810
Likes: 236
From: Burnt on a mantle
Default

LOL wut?
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2014 | 05:53 PM
  #279  
Broseph Stalin's Avatar
Broseph Stalin
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: Tampa
Default

Originally Posted by Jah70
Logout bro.
" Reportedly over 80% of the internal components were redesigned or strengthened to handle an increased RPM range sporting a lofty 7,500 rpm redline. A new dual-path intake (two air cleaners, throttle bodies, etc.) lowers intake tract restriction by 18 percent and new equal-length exhaust manifolds lead into mufflers that are 25 percent more free-flowing for all around better airflow. The electrically actuated variable valve timing on the exhaust cams to broaden the torque curve is new over the "DE" engine. The new engine block retained the same bore and stroke, but the connecting rods were lengthened and the block deck was raised by 8.4 mm to reduce piston side-loads. This modification, along with the use of larger crank bearings with main bearing caps reinforced by a rigid ladder-type main cap girdle to allow the engine reliably rev to 7500 rpm. With an increase in compression ratio from 10.3:1 to 10.6:1 these changes add 6 more horsepower (306 total + 3 hp ram air effect not measured by SAE testing = 309 hp). Peak torque is up 8 pound-feet from the older "DE" engine (260 vs. 268) and the torque curve is higher and flatter across most of the rpm range, and especially in the lower rpm range."


Please stay here
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2014 | 06:42 PM
  #280  
Jah70's Avatar
Jah70
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,901
Likes: 13
From: Greenwich, Connecticut
Default

Originally Posted by Broseph Stalin

" Reportedly over 80% of the internal components were redesigned or strengthened to handle an increased RPM range sporting a lofty 7,500 rpm redline. A new dual-path intake (two air cleaners, throttle bodies, etc.) lowers intake tract restriction by 18 percent and new equal-length exhaust manifolds lead into mufflers that are 25 percent more free-flowing for all around better airflow. The electrically actuated variable valve timing on the exhaust cams to broaden the torque curve is new over the "DE" engine. The new engine block retained the same bore and stroke, but the connecting rods were lengthened and the block deck was raised by 8.4 mm to reduce piston side-loads. This modification, along with the use of larger crank bearings with main bearing caps reinforced by a rigid ladder-type main cap girdle to allow the engine reliably rev to 7500 rpm. With an increase in compression ratio from 10.3:1 to 10.6:1 these changes add 6 more horsepower (306 total + 3 hp ram air effect not measured by SAE testing = 309 hp). Peak torque is up 8 pound-feet from the older "DE" engine (260 vs. 268) and the torque curve is higher and flatter across most of the rpm range, and especially in the lower rpm range."

Please stay here
Your acting like I care. What exactly is your point? If you already have all that info plus the info from the 90 billion threads on the same topic why the need to create that thread asking the same thing? Stick to your bench racing.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:29 AM.