Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

300ZX in 4 seats?? Why not 350Z?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 9, 2004 | 06:09 PM
  #1  
rockinbboy's Avatar
rockinbboy
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,096
Likes: 0
From: Wild Wild West
Default 300ZX in 4 seats?? Why not 350Z?

I thought Zs were always 2 seaters until I saw this stock Z in my apt that had 4 seats. It made me wonder why the 350Z is not a four seater. THE G35 SC doesn't count since I want looks and performance of the 350Z. I want a 350Z with 4 seats!!
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2004 | 06:30 PM
  #2  
Zcarboy's Avatar
Zcarboy
New Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 0
From: Jersey
Default

I never really liked the 300ZX with the four seats. I prefer the two seater since the back seat was pretty much use less for sitting in.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2004 | 06:51 PM
  #3  
MY350Z.COM's Avatar
MY350Z.COM
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 579
Likes: 2
Default

4 seats weigh too much and makes the car look too extended.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2004 | 06:51 PM
  #4  
35oZephyR's Avatar
35oZephyR
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 8,617
Likes: 1
From: san diego
Default

It would probably kill the look of the car. I can't imagine a stretched out 350z.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2004 | 06:58 PM
  #5  
theonetheonly's Avatar
theonetheonly
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
From: USA/CANADA
Default

I like the fact it is a 2 seater. I am never the DD since only one other person can fit in it.

Also it feels more like a sports car with only 2 seats.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2004 | 07:08 PM
  #6  
CelticPride2's Avatar
CelticPride2
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,308
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere...
Default

Originally posted by 35oZephyR
It would probably kill the look of the car. I can't imagine a stretched out 350z.
Indeed....the 2+2 version of the 300zx looks noticeably elongated
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2004 | 07:33 PM
  #7  
AzianToby's Avatar
AzianToby
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 460
Likes: 1
From: Las Vegas
Default

What's the point of a back seat in a sports car anyways? It's just used to store stuff... not like you can really fit anybody back there.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2004 | 09:55 PM
  #8  
MrGoingdown305's Avatar
MrGoingdown305
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
From: Miami
Default

2 Seater = No In-laws
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2004 | 11:06 PM
  #9  
r34 racer's Avatar
r34 racer
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,322
Likes: 3
From: Huntington Beach, CA
Default

the two back seats of the 90's sports cars were huge jokes, they were meant to save insurance money (these were heavily turbocharged RWD cars...insurance hell), you can't really fit anybody back there over the age of 3.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2004 | 11:18 PM
  #10  
ragtopz's Avatar
ragtopz
New Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,443
Likes: 1
From: honolulu, hawaii
Default

Originally posted by 35oZephyR
It would probably kill the look of the car. I can't imagine a stretched out 350z.
i agree. the 2+2 300zx is too long. if you see the 300zx and 300zx 2+2 next to each other, the 2+2's odd, streached out looks is made even more noticeable. i am glad they didnt make a 2+2 350z.

nissan also probably figured that if they made a 2+2 350z it would eat heavily into the sales of the g35c.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2004 | 11:35 PM
  #11  
Shift_350gt's Avatar
Shift_350gt
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: B.C
Default

i think the back 2 seats is very convinient, you can put whatever you want in the back like bags and such
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2004 | 12:49 AM
  #12  
ml2316's Avatar
ml2316
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 934
Likes: 0
From: ca
Default

you thought Zs were always two seaters until you encountered the one exception.

you are aware of the g35 coupe.

you can't understand why there is no 4-seater 350z.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2004 | 01:38 AM
  #13  
ChazZ's Avatar
ChazZ
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Inland Empire, CA
Default

Originally posted by r34 racer
the two back seats of the 90's sports cars were huge jokes, they were meant to save insurance money (these were heavily turbocharged RWD cars...insurance hell), you can't really fit anybody back there over the age of 3.
Except that the 90-96 TT Z's never came as 2+2. All 4 seater Z's were NA's. Only Supras' came with 2+2 TT's. BTW, you can tell a Z32 coupe and a 2+2 by what side the gas cap is on the side of the fender. If it's a coupe, it's near the door. If it's a 2+2 it will have it on the rear side of the fender.

I do agree, a 2+2 Z33 would look too stretched out. I hope they never make it.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2004 | 07:31 AM
  #14  
zmann's Avatar
zmann
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
From: Murfreesboro, TN
Default

while searching for my son's 300ZX, we tested a 2+2. Not happening. I think the car looks ok, but it begins to feel too much like a sedan and less like a sports car. 2 seater is the way to go. I love my 350Z with 2 seats and would never, ever, purchase a 2+2. my 2c
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2004 | 08:07 AM
  #15  
Zcarboy's Avatar
Zcarboy
New Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 0
From: Jersey
Default I agree

Originally posted by r34 racer
the two back seats of the 90's sports cars were huge jokes, they were meant to save insurance money (these were heavily turbocharged RWD cars...insurance hell), you can't really fit anybody back there over the age of 3.
The 350Z was supposed to go back to original car idea which was a 2 seater. I agree with most that 4 seats was most for insurance purpose in the 90's. No one really put adults in these cars. And besides if you really want four seat that what the G35 coupe is for really. In fact the G35 is a great car for those who want to move on with more room life after the 350Z. With the exception of the Porsche 911 and Supra 93-98 were the few four seat sports cars that I liked. Again I don't think anyone bought those cars because of the back seat.

The other day I saw a lady had a kid in the back of a Lexus 430 with the top up. I didn't know you could really fit a small kid back there! Then again there is always an RX-8 with the extra doors too. When Mazda made the RX-8 there were planning on the people who had the RX-7 in the 90's now married with kids to buy these RX-8s. Guess that didn't happen?
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2004 | 10:05 AM
  #16  
marhot's Avatar
marhot
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 0
From: The Kingdom of Kansas
Default

There is a 2+2 Z. It's called a G35 Coupe.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2004 | 10:16 AM
  #17  
hfm's Avatar
hfm
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 7,527
Likes: 1
From: The Val
Default

No. No. No. No. And for the fifth time, No.

Please do not turn the Z into another 2+2. Owned a 2+2 280zx and don't want to see that styling mistake made again.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2004 | 11:05 AM
  #18  
Michael-Dallas's Avatar
Michael-Dallas
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
From: Frisco, TX
Default

Originally posted by ChazZ
Except that the 90-96 TT Z's never came as 2+2.
Wrong-o. Nissan sold the 300ZX 2+2 TT everywhere BUT the US because of the comments in this thread. Nissan felt that Americans wanted a 2-seater sports car more than a 2+2.

Furthemore, the 2+2, although heavier, is better balanced on the road track because of it's longer wheelbase.

Nonetheless, to answer the original question why no 350z 2+2... it's the same reason why the 350z doesn't have t-tops or a sunroof: the original 240z never had those options. However, the G35 coupe is supposed to fill that void.

Michael.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2004 | 11:24 AM
  #19  
Zcarboy's Avatar
Zcarboy
New Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 0
From: Jersey
Default

I doubt Nissan will even make the 350Z a four seater or else it would look like a G35 coupe with a Nissan emblem on it.

Back in 2002 when I found out Nissan was making another Z car I was relieved that it wasn't a four seater or even 4 cylinder too.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2004 | 12:39 PM
  #20  
Dissident's Avatar
Dissident
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,544
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default

It would be pretty ugly.....

Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:48 AM.