Notices
2009+ 370Z General discussion and news for the Z34 (2009+) Nissan 370z with the new 3.7-liter V6

5.4 0-60 (Autoweek) CLEARED UP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 12:29 AM
  #1  
bigdog1250's Avatar
bigdog1250
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
From: Sonoma, CA
Default 5.4 0-60 (Autoweek) CLEARED UP

Just to let everyone know, if you haven't read for yourself the claim made by Autoweek that the 370z ran a 5.4 0-60, please relize that they did NOT test the car, and that time (as well as the 3,220lb weight) were ESTIMATED.

Besides that being off, the article is fairly accurate and offers good looking pics of the car in white or light silver, its hard to tell. But definitely check it out, the profile shot of the car is gorgeous, can't wait to drive one!

P.S. Take that ZZTOPP!!!
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 12:39 AM
  #2  
bauertt's Avatar
bauertt
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver
Default

scans pls?
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 05:53 AM
  #3  
DIGItonium's Avatar
DIGItonium
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,836
Likes: 1
From: Kansas
Default

C&D's latest issue estimates 5s 0-60 and 13.6s 1/4 mi. I take it as a grain of salt, but they also say the curb weight is around 3350-3400 lbs! No actual figures.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 06:02 AM
  #4  
My350P's Avatar
My350P
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach, VA
Default

I really hope those numbers are off. Does not even sound like an improvement over the HR 350Zs.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 06:03 AM
  #5  
xNeo's Avatar
xNeo
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 925
Likes: 0
From: Boston, Ma
Default

Originally Posted by DIGItonium
C&D's latest issue estimates 5s 0-60 and 13.6s 1/4 mi. I take it as a grain of salt, but they also say the curb weight is around 3350-3400 lbs! No actual figures.
Those are 07-08 Numbers with a good driver, so I think with a good driver the 370 should break 13.1 ish and break 12 with a great driver. Just my .02
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 06:43 AM
  #6  
rockinbboy's Avatar
rockinbboy
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,096
Likes: 0
From: Wild Wild West
Default

What was the 0-60 time for the 03-06 models? I thought those were 5.6 range?
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 07:34 AM
  #7  
DBZ33's Avatar
DBZ33
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
From: Des Plaines, IL.
Default

When do you think we will see real test's?
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 08:31 AM
  #8  
Ilike350Z's Avatar
Ilike350Z
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
From: VA
Default

current nismo can do 5.2 or less. 370Z should do even lower
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 08:44 AM
  #9  
Greg06's Avatar
Greg06
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco
Default

I'll bet this thread is going to start turning into just another version of this one.

https://my350z.com/forum/2009-370z/3...imes-370z.html
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 09:08 AM
  #10  
trebien's Avatar
trebien
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
From: ATX
Default

Again, comparing the 350Z to the 370Z, the 370Z looks like it's only about 75 pounds lighter than a similar 350Z. Nothing special, and not the rumored 200+ pounds.

The engine has a little more torque across the board, and 26 higher peak HP.

These are all improvements, but nothing revolutionary. The 370Z will be faster, but not by boatloads that the dreamers want.

The best method to "guesstimate" the 370Z times actually would be to look at the new G37 sedan times... same engine, same power delivery, same gearing, same transmissions, similar suspension setup, similar chassis... just ~300 pounds heavier. The main variable that's left in the equation would be the 370Z's ability to hook up off the line, compared to the G37. Everything else is already tested.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 12:35 PM
  #11  
bigdog1250's Avatar
bigdog1250
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
From: Sonoma, CA
Default

Originally Posted by trebien
Again, comparing the 350Z to the 370Z, the 370Z looks like it's only about 75 pounds lighter than a similar 350Z. Nothing special, and not the rumored 200+ pounds.

The engine has a little more torque across the board, and 26 higher peak HP.

These are all improvements, but nothing revolutionary. The 370Z will be faster, but not by boatloads that the dreamers want.

The best method to "guesstimate" the 370Z times actually would be to look at the new G37 sedan times... same engine, same power delivery, same gearing, same transmissions, similar suspension setup, similar chassis... just ~300 pounds heavier. The main variable that's left in the equation would be the 370Z's ability to hook up off the line, compared to the G37. Everything else is already tested.
You absolutely right. Even though the new Z is not THAT much more powerful or lighter, I'm sure Nissan Engineered this thing to be quick as hell with what it has, just like the GT-R. So seeing that the G's are running low to flat 5's, the Z will easily be 5 flat but most likely below that.

And yes, I made this thread simply to clarify that the AutoWeek data was simply an estimate, and now it seems Car and Driver also has estimated times too. The REAL TESTED figures are what I can't wait for.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 01:49 PM
  #12  
ttbbsolid's Avatar
ttbbsolid
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: california
Default

5.1 sec edmunds tested.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 03:12 PM
  #13  
TreeFiddyZee's Avatar
TreeFiddyZee
Do WHAAAAT!?
Premier Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,476
Likes: 3
From: Hoosier-ville
Default

Call me a party-pooper, but rather than "guesstimating" why don't we just wait for some actual numbers. This is another version of bench-racing and it's just worthless.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2008 | 06:38 PM
  #14  
Ilike350Z's Avatar
Ilike350Z
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
From: VA
Default

i have a feeling nissan is going to offer the 4.5L V8 in 2-3yrs. thats probably why they didnt bump the Hp from the 3.7L V6.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2008 | 09:26 PM
  #15  
Endgame's Avatar
Endgame
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix
Default

Originally Posted by ttbbsolid
5.1 sec edmunds tested.
MotorTrend = 0-60 in 4.7....
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2008 | 01:15 AM
  #16  
bigdog1250's Avatar
bigdog1250
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
From: Sonoma, CA
Default

Those Motortrend stats made me poop myself, i'm so excite!!!!

Went back to the SF Auto Show for the second time today..... just as sexy
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2008 | 04:59 AM
  #17  
trey100's Avatar
trey100
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Default

Originally Posted by ttbbsolid
5.1 sec edmunds tested.
They mention 4.9 sec with 1' rollout. I'm not sure if typical magazine times inlcude this 1' rollout as well.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2008 | 09:15 AM
  #18  
ZZtopp's Avatar
ZZtopp
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Default

Originally Posted by bigdog1250
Just to let everyone know, if you haven't read for yourself the claim made by Autoweek that the 370z ran a 5.4 0-60, please relize that they did NOT test the car, and that time (as well as the 3,220lb weight) were ESTIMATED.

Besides that being off, the article is fairly accurate and offers good looking pics of the car in white or light silver, its hard to tell. But definitely check it out, the profile shot of the car is gorgeous, can't wait to drive one!

P.S. Take that ZZTOPP!!!
I did post that it was an estimate...maybe you should read a bit more carefully next time....that way you won't make such a fool of yourself, acting you've uncovered some secret plot to discredit the 370Z.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2008 | 12:37 PM
  #19  
JCSVT's Avatar
JCSVT
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
From: USA
Default

The guy in the auto-X forum weighed a base 370Z.

2009 base weight:

Per the B Stock 350Z drivers instructions, 3/4 tank of fuel, no spare, jack or tools.

3246lbs
56% front

LF 886 RF 939
LR 737 RR 685

I did not level the scales, since it was not a Sport I was not going to waste a lot of time on it, but the total is still good.

Weight with spare/tools/jack 3289.
It's heavier than I though it would be.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2008 | 06:21 PM
  #20  
Faboo's Avatar
Faboo
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 630
Likes: 0
From: Buena Park
Unhappy

Originally Posted by JCSVT
The guy in the auto-X forum weighed a base 370Z.



It's heavier than I though it would be.

not good
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:32 PM.