Notices
2009+ Nissan GT-R Nissan R35 GT-R Discussion

GTR SpecV unveiled

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 10, 2009 | 11:53 AM
  #21  
da mayor's Avatar
da mayor
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
From: Massapequa, Long Island, NY
Default

one expensive puppy
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2009 | 12:29 PM
  #22  
gr8grz's Avatar
gr8grz
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 620
Likes: 0
From: OC
Default

These are gonna all be picked up by Japanese tuners and race teams...
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2009 | 12:44 PM
  #23  
fallenromeo's Avatar
fallenromeo
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,954
Likes: 31
From: The Cubicle of Hate
Default

wow. 170K and for what? Ridiculously unnecessary brakes, 132 lbs weight loss, 15 tq for 80 seconds and no HP increase....anyone who would actually buy this is....special.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2009 | 01:09 PM
  #24  
350Zrida's Avatar
350Zrida
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 867
Likes: 1
From: Fort Irwin
Default

All of the numbers released are from Nissan correct? There havent been any independent tests just yet. I do think that 170K is a lot for what is listed, but this car could quite possibly outperform other cars listed at the same price just like the GT-R does.
At the end of the day though, if I had the money, it would go to a non spec-v GT-R
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2009 | 01:17 PM
  #25  
black06z's Avatar
black06z
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,166
Likes: 0
From: West Coast/Pacific Rim
Default

Absolutely atrocious. What were they thinking???
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2009 | 02:58 PM
  #26  
Divergent13's Avatar
Divergent13
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 0
From: Northwest
Default

Originally Posted by black06z
Absolutely atrocious. What were they thinking???
+1
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2009 | 03:20 PM
  #27  
Gunit35's Avatar
Gunit35
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: MA
Default

I wonder if Nissan has any official performance numbers for the specV. If I remember correctly, there were unofficial 'Ring times for the specV around 7:24 but nothing after that.

If Nissan wants to sell this car for $170K, they should provide some performance numbers to justify the price. Because as of right now, the listed specs do not justify the price. And if they think people are going to spend double the price of a base GTR for exclusivity, they are crazy. Somebody that has $170k to spend on a car is not going to buy a Nissan for it's exclusivity. To them, it's still going to be a Nissan.

Oh, and the exhaust tips are ugly. What the hell is "titanium-coated?" For $170k, they should be putting on a real titanium exhaust.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2009 | 03:45 PM
  #28  
KingBaby's Avatar
KingBaby
Hardest Setting
Premier Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 13,406
Likes: 130
From: MexiCali dodging potholes
Default

Yea my soul hurts too...
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2009 | 05:18 PM
  #29  
trebien's Avatar
trebien
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
From: ATX
Default

Anticlimactic, for sure. That 15 ft-lbs? What's that, 3%? Geez...
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2009 | 07:12 PM
  #30  
aznmojo's Avatar
aznmojo
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 2
From: Hong Kong
Default

this is the most disappointing car to come out of Nissan in a very long time. Overpriced for absolutely no good reasons. The jump from a base corvette to a Z06 to a ZR1 makes sense... but wow this car doesn't even add more power and costs almost 2 ZR1s???
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2009 | 10:53 PM
  #31  
hiz-n-herz's Avatar
hiz-n-herz
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 0
From: SF South Bay area
Default

They are not about to release specs for it because they have eliminated Launch Control. So the 0-60 and 1/4 mile times will go down. They are not about to announce that....

I think FAIL...
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2009 | 01:06 AM
  #32  
GHOST1207's Avatar
GHOST1207
Registered User
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,397
Likes: 0
From: SoCal/High Desert Area
Default

It only costs so much because of the NISMO exhaust, and probably all the other overpriced NISMO parts that may be on it, LOL.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2009 | 09:06 AM
  #33  
jumisu's Avatar
jumisu
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: st. louis
Default

they should drop the overkill brakes and offer the car for 125k
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2009 | 09:57 AM
  #34  
JDMFairladyZ33's Avatar
JDMFairladyZ33
New Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 6,481
Likes: 1
From: Dallas, TX
Default

Dang at that price I would rather look into a Porsche 997 Turbo
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2009 | 12:53 PM
  #35  
Mid117's Avatar
Mid117
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,020
Likes: 0
From: NYC/LI
Default

oh man, this is such a ZR-1 killerrrr!11!!!!!


You might as well buy a base one and mod it, this is a waste.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2009 | 01:31 PM
  #36  
hiz-n-herz's Avatar
hiz-n-herz
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 0
From: SF South Bay area
Default

One of the locals here started modding his GTR with CF race seats, Dry CF parts, much lighter wheels, etc and I think he has dropped 200 lbs from his car. He is also doing different downpipes and different mid-pipes and A Cobb tuning access port.

He has built a Spec-v and still has his back seats. Most of the stuff donated or at a good price from sponsors.

If this is the spec-v, I am really disappointed. And are these only available in Japan? No US-Spec? I was hoping some one here would pick up a Spec-V and sell their GTR to me :-)
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2009 | 09:20 AM
  #37  
Steven622's Avatar
Steven622
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
From: Denver
Default

Peak output remains the same, at 478 horsepower, but a switch on the right of the steering wheel (shared with the cruise control) activates an electronic circuit to boost mid-range torque by 15 lb-ft (up to 449 lb-ft). A green light illuminates on the dash when the overboost function is enabled, giving drivers 80 seconds to perform any overtaking maneuvers, and then defaulting back to the standard setting.
Wow a whole 15lb ft. So all their shitty exhaust did the same numbers as the old setup? You can gain more power by getting rid of cats.

I'd much much rather take a ZR1.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2009 | 09:24 AM
  #38  
michaeljr6's Avatar
michaeljr6
New Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 10,459
Likes: 0
From: small home.
Default

nissan sucks..........................told you guys.

porsche wins
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2009 | 09:50 AM
  #39  
plumpzz's Avatar
plumpzz
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,146
Likes: 0
From: Jersey, New
Default

For all you know the car is highly underrated, and will outperform the standard GTR by quite a few. Nissan is improving things that will help the specV perform well on a tight track, such as weight and brakes.

Although, if I could, I would just buy a standard GTR, get dry carbon bucket seats, Light 18/19'' wheels, straight pipes and a single outlet exhaust and call it a day. 500whp and minus 150lbs..
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2009 | 10:27 AM
  #40  
Divergent13's Avatar
Divergent13
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 0
From: Northwest
Default

Originally Posted by michaeljr6
nissan sucks..........................told you guys.

porsche wins
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:00 AM.