Notices
350Z Roadster General discussion for the 350Z Roadster

Nissan Releases Photo of All-New 2004 Z Roadster

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 6, 2003 | 08:38 AM
  #21  
importriders's Avatar
importriders
New Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Default

Good photoshop of the top up. I bet that is exaclty how it will look.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2003 | 08:42 AM
  #22  
socos's Avatar
socos
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere
Default

Yep... ever driven a Corvette convertible? That's a blind spot nightmare.

Might be even worse with the 350Z since you sit so low in the car.. especially if you're under 6 ft tall.

Maybe the real version will have little port holes like the Z32 convertible did.

Originally posted by ares
I hope that isnt how it is with top up... the blind spot is gonna be HUGE. no port hole window? the custom one didnt have one. you couldnt look next to you for a car.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2003 | 08:46 AM
  #23  
TEDT350Z's Avatar
TEDT350Z
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Lodi
Default just a thought

How hard could it have been for Nissan to design a hard top convertible? Imagine how sweet it would be to not worry about someone taking a knife and carving there initials into a soft top...let alone the more durability in a hard top versus a soft top. It would be great competition against the slk and any others that have managed to achieve a hardtop retractible design.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2003 | 08:51 AM
  #24  
jesperanza's Avatar
jesperanza
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Default

Thanks for the post. I am really impressed with the look, but I am still happy with the hardtop.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2003 | 08:53 AM
  #25  
flynnibus's Avatar
flynnibus
Z Flier
Premier Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 650
Likes: 0
From: VA - USA
Default

Originally posted by ares
I hope that isnt how it is with top up... the blind spot is gonna be HUGE. no port hole window? the custom one didnt have one. you couldnt look next to you for a car.
We have a window there now??? I can't even see the window.. let alone out of it. I use mirrors, doors, and rear. The C pillar window is non-existant for me.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2003 | 09:39 AM
  #26  
qirex's Avatar
qirex
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default Re: just a thought

Originally posted by TEDT350Z
How hard could it have been for Nissan to design a hard top convertible? Imagine how sweet it would be to not worry about someone taking a knife and carving there initials into a soft top...let alone the more durability in a hard top versus a soft top. It would be great competition against the slk and any others that have managed to achieve a hardtop retractible design.
ahemmm

hard top conv = $$$$$

as it is ...this model will be ~$40K.

an S2000 is $32K and a boxster is ~$45K....a hardtop 350z would be ~$55K and weigh ~3800lbs.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2003 | 09:49 AM
  #27  
ares's Avatar
ares
Veteran
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,816
Likes: 2
From: ATL
Default

I think thats all a bit high, the conv as is will be under 35 AT MOST, of course you can maybe run it up to 40 with everything. but you can get it for less.

hard top wouldnt have to weigh too much more, conv will weigh more too. the bulkier engines would weigh a bit. I think the biggest problem is that hardtop=NO TRUNK. you gotta put it somewhere... so when the tops down it can be like the SC430 which is like envolope space.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2003 | 09:59 AM
  #28  
fanatic6711's Avatar
fanatic6711
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
From: East Rutherford, Jersey
Default

Just talked to a sales person at my local Nissan Dealership. They said the convertible will be available in July. He had no other info what so ever on it. He didn't even see the picture yet!
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2003 | 10:04 AM
  #29  
DrCold's Avatar
DrCold
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
From: Coeur d'Alene, ID
Default

I think I would be more excited about the roadster, if it had a removable hard top. Like the s2000. I am not a big fan of softops, so if they offered a removable hard top I’d be all over this. But as it sits, the coupe seems more appealing to me. Maybe I’m just asking for too much… What do you all think?

-DrCold
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2003 | 11:04 AM
  #30  
AndyB's Avatar
AndyB
New Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 5
From: Connecticut
Default new roadster

pretty pretty pretty pretty pretty pretty pretty pretty pretty pretty pretty pretty pretty pretty pretty pretty pretty pretty pretty pretty

gotta have it! gotta have it! gotta have it! gotta have it! gotta have it! gotta have it! gotta have it! gotta have it! gotta have it! gotta have it! gotta have it! gotta have it!

Waiting until July sucks...Waiting until July sucks...Waiting until July sucks...Waiting until July sucks...Waiting until July sucks...Waiting until July sucks...Waiting until July sucks...Waiting until July sucks...

Man, these pictures just made waiting even harder!
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2003 | 11:11 AM
  #31  
jleighZ's Avatar
jleighZ
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
From: Cape Girardeau, MO
Default

Down boy!!!

It looks ok, better than I thought it would.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2003 | 12:00 PM
  #32  
Chris S's Avatar
Chris S
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Default

Originally posted by Jewelz350
I thought somewhere along the lines someone posted that it wouldn't be offered in the track version. Without a roll bar you can't take it on a track so that kinda makes since.
It has roll hoops behind the seats. Don’t think those will pass tech for the track? Legions of S2000 owners could prove you wrong! They’ve been extensively tested (involuntarily) on the S2000, and have been found to work quite well!
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2003 | 02:44 PM
  #33  
qirex's Avatar
qirex
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default

Originally posted by ares
I think thats all a bit high, the conv as is will be under 35 AT MOST, of course you can maybe run it up to 40 with everything. but you can get it for less.

hard top wouldnt have to weigh too much more, conv will weigh more too. the bulkier engines would weigh a bit. I think the biggest problem is that hardtop=NO TRUNK. you gotta put it somewhere... so when the tops down it can be like the SC430 which is like envolope space.
usually convertibles add AT LEAST $5K to price.

This one looks like it has leather and the 18" touring 6-spokes - which means its a touring based vert. auto touring is $31.3K, while the 6MT is $33.5....so do the math!
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2003 | 05:33 PM
  #34  
BRONXWARRIOR's Avatar
BRONXWARRIOR
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,614
Likes: 0
From: BRONX NY
Default

think it looks kida gay with the soft top i hope they offer a removable hardtop for say 3000 a power hardtop would make the price out of hand.
and a glass window is a must with a soft top.

interesting question will it affect head clearence most convetables with the top on for anyone 6' and over there head is at the very least scrapping the celling

i however am not a convertable person i prefer the open road with a harley.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2003 | 07:27 PM
  #35  
MannishBoy's Avatar
MannishBoy
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,282
Likes: 0
From: Nashville
Default

Hah, that top down parked shot even makes the show car look like the color doesn't match on the cover

Gotta love the paint matching on DB.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2003 | 07:39 PM
  #36  
BRONXWARRIOR's Avatar
BRONXWARRIOR
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,614
Likes: 0
From: BRONX NY
Default

as a DB owner i must say only under certain lighting does it apear to miss match and not a single person has noticed it asides from people on this forum
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2003 | 07:44 PM
  #37  
MannishBoy's Avatar
MannishBoy
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,282
Likes: 0
From: Nashville
Default

My gas cap appears to not match most of the times. Bumpers only depending on lighting. Rear is more obvious than the front.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2003 | 05:16 AM
  #38  
bluefish's Avatar
bluefish
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
From: Patchogue Long Island, NY
Default Bravo Nissan

Glad i waited..

Roadster babe...
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2003 | 06:59 AM
  #39  
#15Blade's Avatar
#15Blade
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
From: USA
Default

Beautiful! Now I only have 3 questions

1) What's it look like with the top up? (Nice photoshop, but I want some actual pics!)

2) How much is it going to cost?

3) When will it get here?
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2003 | 08:06 AM
  #40  
DUKE's Avatar
DUKE
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
From: NC
Default

What happened to the Photochop picture with the top up?

It's not showing up anymore.

OK, Now it's showing up again.

Last edited by DUKE; Feb 7, 2003 at 08:55 AM.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:53 PM.