Notices
Autocross/Road SCCA Solo II, SCCA Club Racing, Redline Track Events, Speed Trial, Speed Ventures, Grand-Am Cup, JGTC, Procar Australia

2009 370Z for Autocross

Old Nov 26, 2008 | 09:02 AM
  #21  
Ataru074's Avatar
Ataru074
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 0
From: Houston,TX
Default

Originally Posted by ULLLOSE
Not scientific at all, but I had a co-worker push down on the front to see what kind of camber gain it picked up. A 1/2" of compression resulted in -.2 increase in camber. No idea how this compares to the previous car, but I doubt there would be much difference.

John form Beta is coming over now to check out the cooler... Maybe he will be able to copy it and offer a kit, or parts list.
pretty much the same about the camber gain.... my nismo is dropped about 1.5 inches and and went from 1.4 to 2 deg of camber..

about the cooler.. well a kit would be really nice with a reasonable price :-)
so far I can't find anybody doing the job for less than 2K.. than honestly is a little too much for a pump, a cooler, some hose and some fittings.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2008 | 05:54 PM
  #22  
deblooz's Avatar
deblooz
New Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Odenton, Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by ULLLOSE
No doubt it has AS power, but autox is not all about power - so I am trying to not let that cloud my judgment.

Positives: HP and Tq, wide wheels and big tires.
Negatives: Width, camber, LSD, weight.

I am still leaning towards BS, but luckily I don't have to make that decision.
I tend to agree. As long as an updated car model doesn't come up with drastic performance stats, it seems that the council generally grandfathers the new model in, like the 240Z-280Z series. As to reclassing, it took the council two years to decide that the S2000 was outclassing every other car in BS.
I guess as long as noone in a 370Z constantly beats the pants of the RX-8s, it will remain BS - even with coolers and LSD.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2009 | 01:27 PM
  #23  
DriveI65's Avatar
DriveI65
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
From: Falkville, AL
Default

Fastrack

B Stock it is.
2) Stock: Effective immediately upon publication, the following new listing is added:
Nissan 370Z BS
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2009 | 06:15 AM
  #24  
Mr.Jadkowski's Avatar
Mr.Jadkowski
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: Savannah, GA
Default

Originally Posted by ULLLOSE
2009 base weight:

Weight with spare/tools/jack 3289.
I just weighed my '04 with no spare/tools/jack and a 1/4 tank, it was 3140. Apparently nissan couldn't cut the weight quite as much as they claimed!
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2009 | 07:53 AM
  #25  
Chiketkd's Avatar
Chiketkd
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: Charlottesville, VA
Default

Originally Posted by DriveI65
Fastrack

B Stock it is.
Here's hoping the 350Z/370Z numbers at Nats increase. I'd love to see a BS class this year that's similar in size to AS & SS.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2009 | 01:24 PM
  #26  
guitarist's Avatar
guitarist
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 180
Likes: 1
From: Little Rock
Default

Originally Posted by Chiketkd
Here's hoping the 350Z/370Z numbers at Nats increase. I'd love to see a BS class this year that's similar in size to AS & SS.
Me too...unfortunately I don't know how good a performer the 370Z is going to be.

I have one right now that I'm reviewing for work, and I'm really very disappointed with it so far - I was looking forward to being totally jealous of the 370. Admittedly, the car I have is a non-sport with an automatic transmission (why, Nissan, why?), but it's not impressing me in any way beyond the fact that it's about 3x as nice a daily driver as the 350Z.

Without an LSD and a manual transmission, I'm not bothering to do serious performance testing, but even in a straight line it doesn't outrun an automatic 350Z below 80mph by much - a half a car, maybe a car length tops. And once you get the Sport package with the LSD and mandatory 19" wheels on there, the grip will likely overcome the LSD and mean what little power advantage it has is nullified.

The steering is slower and has even less feel, at least compared to my 03. And it's a good 150-200lb heavier than my 03, even in optimal race trim. So really, aside from the ability to run more tire, I don't see where the advantage is.

Camber is still limited in the front, plus the Nismo 350Z gets very similar-sized wheels and hasn't shown a major advantage, so I think the 370Z will be another very close competitor, but no overdog.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2009 | 06:25 PM
  #27  
Chiketkd's Avatar
Chiketkd
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: Charlottesville, VA
Default

Originally Posted by guitarist
so I think the 370Z will be another very close competitor, but no overdog.
I couldn't agree more. Hopefully BS won't be such a spec class.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2009 | 07:41 PM
  #28  
PDX_Racer's Avatar
PDX_Racer
New Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,170
Likes: 76
From: Nashville, TN
Default

Originally Posted by Chiketkd
Here's hoping the 350Z/370Z numbers at Nats increase. I'd love to see a BS class this year that's similar in size to AS & SS.
I'd like to see that, but as long as BS is perceived as "Spec RX-8" it's going to be tough to get anyone else out. BS went through the same thing when the S2000 was winning everything (before its move to AS).

I'm glad that Brian Heitkotter has brought out a turbo MR-2 and has shown that it is competitive.

I'm planning to be back again this year -- and I've now got more experience with the 285s (2007 Nationals was only the third time I'd had 285s on the car -- ever!).
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2009 | 09:14 AM
  #29  
ke0ki2k's Avatar
ke0ki2k
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,471
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, Tennessee
Default

doesnt really apply much to autox, but the 370 did outrun the Cayman S around a road course (maybe Willow?) on Road & Track by over a second I iirc. You really can't judge a car based on the limited stats you read on Edmunds or something.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2009 | 09:50 AM
  #30  
guitarist's Avatar
guitarist
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 180
Likes: 1
From: Little Rock
Default

Originally Posted by ke0ki2k
doesnt really apply much to autox, but the 370 did outrun the Cayman S around a road course (maybe Willow?) on Road & Track by over a second I iirc. You really can't judge a car based on the limited stats you read on Edmunds or something.
And both cars come setup from the factory for so much understeer they're almost crippled. Thank the lawyers for that one.

Set them up right, and get them handling in a neutral manner, and things might change a bit. Mid-engine RWD is a fundamentally better solution than front-engine RWD, and Porsche knows a thing or two about chassis tuning. With the new LSD option on the Cayman S, I don't think the Z really has a chance at 250-300lb heavier and only 10-12hp more than the Porsche.

Also, comparing what I know about driving and what I know about the 370Z to what the hacks at the "major publications" have written, I have to wonder if they are 1) bought and paid for, 2) completely incompetent both behind the wheel and the keyboard, or 3) all of the above.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2009 | 10:13 PM
  #31  
Ruff Z's Avatar
Ruff Z
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, WA
Default

Originally Posted by PDX_Racer
I'd like to see that, but as long as BS is perceived as "Spec RX-8" it's going to be tough to get anyone else out. BS went through the same thing when the S2000 was winning everything (before its move to AS).

I'm glad that Brian Heitkotter has brought out a turbo MR-2 and has shown that it is competitive.

I'm planning to be back again this year -- and I've now got more experience with the 285s (2007 Nationals was only the third time I'd had 285s on the car -- ever!).
I might be right there with ya...
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 09:58 AM
  #32  
DriveI65's Avatar
DriveI65
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
From: Falkville, AL
Default

FYI 370Z owners...

From April 09 Fastrack
Regarding the classification of the Nissan 370Z, competitors are reminded that new listings are subject to the provisions of 3.2 and will be watched closely.
From 09 SCCA Solo Rulebook
3.2 VEHICLE CLASSIFICATION
New car makes, types and models will be classified by the SEB as soon as sufficient information is available to do so. The SEB may reclassify a car within the 12-month period following its initial classification, without the approval of the Board of Directors. “Initial classification” includes the addition of a new listing on an exclusion list.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 10:06 AM
  #33  
TractionCircle's Avatar
TractionCircle
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: Margate, FL
Default

Originally Posted by PDX_Racer
I'm glad that Brian Heitkotter has brought out a turbo MR-2 and has shown that it is competitive.
Glenn, I think he's picked up an RX-8 ride and has started to get the hang of it (see SD tour results!!). I spoke to him at Nationals and he said that he was about 2 seconds faster in his RX-8 than he was in his MR2. Doesn't bode well for the the anti-spec class idea

Hell, I drove an RX8 at the Dixie tour and really found it to be very easy to drive fast. That being said, I still prefer the Z to drive everyday and would continue to campaign it if I didn't have an alternate ride.

P.S: Do you have a codriver for Packwood? Was considering flying out.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 07:09 PM
  #34  
PDX_Racer's Avatar
PDX_Racer
New Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,170
Likes: 76
From: Nashville, TN
Default

Originally Posted by TractionCircle
Glenn, I think he's picked up an RX-8 ride and has started to get the hang of it (see SD tour results!!). I spoke to him at Nationals and he said that he was about 2 seconds faster in his RX-8 than he was in his MR2. Doesn't bode well for the the anti-spec class idea

Hell, I drove an RX8 at the Dixie tour and really found it to be very easy to drive fast. That being said, I still prefer the Z to drive everyday and would continue to campaign it if I didn't have an alternate ride.

P.S: Do you have a codriver for Packwood? Was considering flying out.
I think that Brian would be fast in almost anything. Certainly, if you know how to keep the momentum up, and are running on a speed-maintenance course, it then comes down to minimum distance -- which helps when the car is narrower (and you leave less space between the car and the cone).

Cars that are easy to drive fast will do well until someone figures out the faster car (example: AP1 S2000 in the "original" B Stock, or even the AP2 S2000 over the AP1 S2000 in A Stock).

I haven't even really started thinking about Packwood, other than remembering that it's almost a month earlier. Our season hasn't even really started yet (a local event two weekends ago was snowed out!).
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2009 | 12:16 PM
  #35  
Chiketkd's Avatar
Chiketkd
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: Charlottesville, VA
Default

Originally Posted by TractionCircle
I spoke to him at Nationals and he said that he was about 2 seconds faster in his RX-8 than he was in his MR2.
Jason,

I remember speaking to Brian on the same subject at Nats, but he mentioned he was 1 second faster in the RX-8 than his MR2-T. However, the MR2-T would clearly be the better pro solo car, and I see he's registered in that for El Toro.

He could definitely raise the bar in the class. He took down the 4 time national champ by a solid time margin.
Originally Posted by PDX_Racer
I think that Brian would be fast in almost anything.
I was at the banquet @ Nats with Brian, and while he seemed "pleased" overall with his 3rd place finish, he did mention that he wasn't happy with his driving on Day 1.

Brian will definitely be one of the top dog @ Nats this Fall if he keeps driving like that!
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2009 | 12:24 PM
  #36  
ULLLOSE's Avatar
ULLLOSE
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
From: Orange County
Default

Originally Posted by Chiketkd
Jason,

I remember speaking to Brian on the same subject at Nats, but he mentioned he was 1 second faster in the RX-8 than his MR2-T. However, the MR2-T would clearly be the better pro solo car, and I see he's registered in that for El Toro.

He could definitely raise the bar in the class. He took down the 4 time national champ by a solid time margin.

I was at the banquet @ Nats with Brian, and while he seemed "pleased" overall with his 3rd place finish, he did mention that he wasn't happy with his driving on Day 1.

Brian will definitely be one of the top dog @ Nats this Fall if he keeps driving like that!
I told him he should run the RX-8 at the pro, but he said he had unfinished business at El Toro with the MR2 - I am sure he is refereeing to coning away the win at the last two pros there.

Hopefully with a new set of tires on for the pro the results will look different than last week.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2009 | 03:58 PM
  #37  
davids's Avatar
davids
F U StuLax18
Premier Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,419
Likes: 0
From: H-Town
Default

A 350 or 370 can outrun an RX-8, they are so similar in many way. I think the 06's are actually best setup for auto-x because of the extra RPM's.

I think a lot of people get it into their head that "Its the car its the car" when 99% of it is the driver.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 12:52 PM
  #38  
TractionCircle's Avatar
TractionCircle
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: Margate, FL
Default

Man, so what you are saying is that folks like Cavanaugh, Austin, and Myself just need to learn how to drive?

I just drove an RX8 at the last national tour and I can tell you that they do certain things better than my Z. At some point, it's not the car, it's not the driver, it's physics.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2009 | 09:14 AM
  #39  
tomsn16's Avatar
tomsn16
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland,tn
Default

DAVIDS does not appear to be well informed about the fine art of autocross.He will be really disappointed to know that neither the BS Z's nor the RX8's can beat the CS Miata or Solstice cars.....more physics...autocross is more about small/light cars with just enough motor to get the job done.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2009 | 09:17 AM
  #40  
TractionCircle's Avatar
TractionCircle
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: Margate, FL
Default

And now with Beutzer getting a Solstice, it may really tip the scales in CS's favor. For the record Jim, I sent my letter in opposing the BS/CS merger also

On a lighter note, I'll see you guys in Lincoln it seems. I will be codriving an RX8 there as well, proving to Davids that it may well be the car :P
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:36 PM.