Notices
Autocross/Road SCCA Solo II, SCCA Club Racing, Redline Track Events, Speed Trial, Speed Ventures, Grand-Am Cup, JGTC, Procar Australia

Rumor: 350Z Classed in Solo2 STR

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-24-2009, 07:44 AM
  #21  
betamotorsports
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
betamotorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: La Habra, CA, USA
Posts: 1,393
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

When's the next Fastrack coming out?
Came out yesterday. No mention of an update to STR although the 350Z is now classed in FP for Solo2 competition. How light can a 350Z get?
Old 06-24-2009, 07:36 PM
  #22  
akomsr1
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
akomsr1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: chicago
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by betamotorsports
Came out yesterday. No mention of an update to STR although the 350Z is now classed in FP for Solo2 competition. How light can a 350Z get?
I vaguely remember one of the drift car builds on this forum getting theirs down to 2300lbs with a sr20?
Old 07-20-2009, 01:54 PM
  #23  
DavesZ#3
350Z-holic
iTrader: (26)
 
DavesZ#3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 15,887
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

It's official as of the August 2009 Fastrack:


STREET TOURING
- Per the STAC, the following revised version of the STR proposal is published for member comment (significant changes are shown in italics):
“Street Touring Class R (STR)
Class requirements and restrictions:
- Only those cars listed below are eligible
Eligible vehicles are:
- Honda S2000
- Mazda Miata (except Mazdaspeed)
- Mazda MX5 Miata (’06-‘09)
- Toyota MR2 (non S/C, non-turbo)
- Toyota MR2 Spyder
- BMW Z3 (non-M)
- BMW Z4 (non-M, non-turbo)
- BMW M Coupe & M Roadster (1998 to 2000)
- Mazda RX7 (non-turbo)
- Porsche 924 & 944 (non-turbo)
- Porsche 911 (1984 to 1989 Carrera 3.2)
- Porsche 968
- Pontiac Solstice (non-turbo)
- Saturn Sky (non-turbo)
- Datsun 240Z & 260Z & 280Z & 280ZX (non-turbo)
- Nissan 350Z
Additional class notes include:
- Tire Allowances (add to 14.3):
AWD – 225mm
2WD – 255mm
- Wheel Allowances (add to 14.4):
AWD – 7.5”
2WD – 9”
- Catalytic Converters (add to 14.10.E):
Same as ST, STS allowance.
- Limited Slip Differentials (add to 14.10.K):
Aftermarkets units allowed per STX/STU rules.”
NOTE, per the STAC: Classing for STR will not be formula based, but will utilize a list of eligible vehicles. Cars *not* on this list are not eligible. However, as in all subjective classing, cars may be petitioned by the membership for inclusion and will be reviewed on a case by case basis.
Old 07-20-2009, 01:57 PM
  #24  
betamotorsports
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
betamotorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: La Habra, CA, USA
Posts: 1,393
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Would I lie... :-)

Start building boys. This the best chance the 350Z has for a national championship in Solo2.
Old 07-20-2009, 02:05 PM
  #25  
DavesZ#3
350Z-holic
iTrader: (26)
 
DavesZ#3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 15,887
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Looks like I'll have to burn up some 265 tires between now and December.
Old 07-20-2009, 05:46 PM
  #26  
Z1NONLY
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Z1NONLY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SW Fl
Posts: 6,503
Received 95 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

255?

STU already has a 245/275 limit, what was wrong with that?

Why such skinny @$$ tires, and what's with the wheel-width BS?

Some Z's come with bigger tires stock.

This is insane.

Last edited by Z1NONLY; 07-20-2009 at 05:57 PM.
Old 07-20-2009, 05:48 PM
  #27  
Peak350
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Peak350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: DeLand, Florida
Posts: 1,844
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Z1NONLY
255?

STU already has a 245/275 limit, what was wrong with that?

Why such skinny @$$ tires, and what's with the wheel-width BS?

This is insane.
We have a local STU2 class that allowed 285, I'm worried this will cause that class to be dissolved.
Old 07-20-2009, 06:02 PM
  #28  
Z1NONLY
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Z1NONLY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SW Fl
Posts: 6,503
Received 95 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Peak350
We have a local STU2 class that allowed 285, I'm worried this will cause that class to be dissolved.
All the STU-2 classes I have ran in had the STU 275 limit, but I wouldn't have protested 285's at an event.

255's are a joke. I don't know what they were thinking.
Old 07-21-2009, 06:06 AM
  #29  
betamotorsports
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
betamotorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: La Habra, CA, USA
Posts: 1,393
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

This is insane.

All the STU-2 classes I have ran in had the STU 275 limit, but I wouldn't have protested 285's at an event.

255's are a joke. I don't know what they were thinking.
STR has nothing to do with STU and its very common to limit cars via tire sizes. Look at World Challenge as a perfect example. This is a starting point and you can expect adjustments down the line as the class matures. Besides, competing on narrower tires will make you a better driver.
Old 07-21-2009, 09:17 AM
  #30  
ULLLOSE
Registered User
 
ULLLOSE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Orange County
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Z1NONLY
All the STU-2 classes I have ran in had the STU 275 limit, but I wouldn't have protested 285's at an event.

255's are a joke. I don't know what they were thinking.
The entire ST category is a little screwed up right now, no continuity from one class to the next. Some get brakes, some don't, different cat rules, wheel and tire sizes that don't flow from one class to the next.

But in reality ST as a whole is still an infant and has a lot of room to grow and mature.

I would say considering that one month ago the Z was not even going to have the option to play you have already made progress. Also remember as a provisional class the rule change process can happen much more quickly. I would expect by the time STR becomes a national class it could have a slightly different set of rules than what you see now.

Are you guys flooding John with calls for his offset bushings yet?

Last edited by ULLLOSE; 07-21-2009 at 09:38 AM.
Old 07-21-2009, 12:37 PM
  #31  
Chiketkd
Registered User
 
Chiketkd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If you are a SCCA member and would like to see this class happen, write your letters to seb@scca.com (you must include your scca member # for your letter to be forwarded on to the SEB).

I sent my letter in support of this proposed class earlier this morning and got my log book # back from Harmer in ~90 minutes!
Old 07-21-2009, 01:34 PM
  #32  
Z1NONLY
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Z1NONLY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SW Fl
Posts: 6,503
Received 95 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chiketkd
If you are a SCCA member and would like to see this class happen, write your letters to seb@scca.com (you must include your scca member # for your letter to be forwarded on to the SEB).

I sent my letter in support of this proposed class earlier this morning and got my log book # back from Harmer in ~90 minutes!
Just sent my letter...
Old 07-22-2009, 06:03 AM
  #33  
M1r4cL3
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
M1r4cL3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sac, CA
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I'm glad to see the 350Z added to the STR group. I was wanting a class that sits between BS and BSP. Now I don't have to reset my car to Stock before each season.

I found that I didn't have the firepower to compete in BSP in my region. BSP is the fastest class 'round here. Most days even faster than A Mod.

I've consistently spanked all S2ks and Miatas this season that are running in the Street Tire Class so I think STR will be ripe for the picking in my region.
Old 07-22-2009, 04:51 PM
  #34  
Z1NONLY
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Z1NONLY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SW Fl
Posts: 6,503
Received 95 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by betamotorsports
STR has nothing to do with STU and its very common to limit cars via tire sizes. Look at World Challenge as a perfect example. This is a starting point and you can expect adjustments down the line as the class matures. Besides, competing on narrower tires will make you a better driver.
I referenced STU because many of the cars listed for STR come from the same "stock" classes that feed STU. I understand the idea of limiting cars via tire sizes. STU already does it in an attempt to give the RWD cars a fighting chance against the AWD beasts.

The fact that this is a starting point gives me hope, but I would feel a lot better if there were some semblance of logic to the tiny-tire-limit imposed on this infant class. It really makes no sense.

I get plenty of seat-time in cars with small/crappy tires. If autocrossing on skinny tires makes me a better driver, I should be Michael Schumacher by now.

Don't get me wrong, I can appreciate trying to be "positive" about this. But there is something very wrong when "track prep" = less effective handling than daily-driver "street prep".
Old 07-24-2009, 11:16 AM
  #35  
Chiketkd
Registered User
 
Chiketkd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Z1NONLY
The fact that this is a starting point gives me hope, but I would feel a lot better if there were some semblance of logic to the tiny-tire-limit imposed on this infant class. It really makes no sense.
This is a starting point, and my personal hope is that STR develops to match a similar rule set as STX (with 265 width tires).

I personally feel the 350Z has a shot in this class with the right set-up. I'd definitely be careful with rear spring rate selection - choose rates that are not super stiff and would allow you to put the power down with 255 tires.

I hope to own a Z again someday, and this would definitely be the class I'd target with my purchase. Used '03 350Z base's are getting dirt cheap. Add a Quaife or OS Giken LSD along with some good coilovers, then add some competitive tires and she'll be ready to tango!!!!
Old 07-24-2009, 11:33 AM
  #36  
M1r4cL3
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
M1r4cL3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sac, CA
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

It is my hope also that the tire size limitation grows to 265 ... that would be Ideal for the 350Z IMO. I've been running 265s up to this point in a Street Tire class and hope to continue to do so in STR.
Old 07-24-2009, 11:34 AM
  #37  
M1r4cL3
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
M1r4cL3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sac, CA
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Does anyone w/ inside information have a feel for how likely or how close STR and these rules are to becoming official?
Old 07-24-2009, 11:37 AM
  #38  
ldstang50
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
ldstang50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: ct
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just heard about this the other day.....personally I'll stick with Bstock, I like the fact all I have to do is buy tires, but NOT changing tires at an event is really nice
Old 07-24-2009, 12:06 PM
  #39  
Chiketkd
Registered User
 
Chiketkd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by M1r4cL3
Does anyone w/ inside information have a feel for how likely or how close STR and these rules are to becoming official?
Hard to say, but from the discussion on sccaforums, there seems to be a lot of positive comments about the class. The fact that the STAC revised the proposal to include the 350Z in the August Fastrack is a good indication that this proposal is moving along nicely. I personally feel there's a good chance STR will be a supplemental class for the 2010 season. It'll be interesting to see what PAX factor Rick Ruth uses for the class.
Originally Posted by ldstang50
Just heard about this the other day.....personally I'll stick with Bstock, I like the fact all I have to do is buy tires, but NOT changing tires at an event is really nice
Agreed. I'd also rather run a Nismo in stock class than STR.

Last edited by Chiketkd; 07-24-2009 at 12:07 PM.
Old 07-24-2009, 12:50 PM
  #40  
Z1NONLY
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Z1NONLY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SW Fl
Posts: 6,503
Received 95 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by M1r4cL3
It is my hope also that the tire size limitation grows to 265 ... that would be Ideal for the 350Z IMO. I've been running 265s up to this point in a Street Tire class and hope to continue to do so in STR.
When our B-Stock nemesis, the RX-8, leaves the stock class to compete on street tires they get 275's.

The STU-2 class here in florida uses the 275 limit and it works well. I hope STR picks it up as well.

Right now the only 255's that will perform all come as a 255/40 (17, in my case) These are almost 5% shorter than stock for the rear of the Z and will look hideous.

Right now I have two sets of lightweight wheels, but they both have 9.5" widths on the back. I will probably experiment with this clown-car 255/40-17 setup using the 9.5" wheels on the back. (I doubt any of our local guys will complain about the extra .5")

If I can get the car to dance on the skinny tires, I will then consider a new set of wheels. I would also try to move toward a 245/45-17 setup that is closer to stock diameter.

-Man these are skinny.

Last edited by Z1NONLY; 07-25-2009 at 04:55 AM.


Quick Reply: Rumor: 350Z Classed in Solo2 STR



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:09 AM.